25 Apr
2017
25 Apr
'17
12:16 p.m.
The treasurer of my ISOC chapter said it took a loooong time to get
(Federal) 501c3 status for the chapter.
Overall it seems better to use the one that's already in place.
Of course I don't know what/how bad these headaches are:
"inherited bureaucratic headaches from ooc (old-omni entity)"
I second jorrit on using the old entity, as long as it
our lawyer gives us
the OK. It seems like the easier option. And our bylaws need a rewrite
anyway, maybe this would be a good reason to give them a once over?
-grant
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Jorrit Poelen <jhpoelen(a)xs4all.nl>
wrote:
> I'd be for recycling the old entity if the
paperwork is not too crazy
and
> that the mission is tailored to what sudomesh
does.
> On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 13:34 -0700, Jenny Ryan
wrote:
> Should we:
> 1) take over omni's old 501c3? -or-
> 2) submit our own application for 501c3 status?
>
> *1) - take over omni's old 501c3?*
> (a) It doesn't have a purpose at the moment, and we worked hella hard on
> procuring it. was a long-form application, so has already been
rigorously
> reviewed by the irs.
<snip>
26 Apr
26 Apr
12:54 a.m.
New subject: Future Entity Structure Discussion
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Eve Edelson <eveedelson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The treasurer of my ISOC chapter said it took a
loooong time to get
(Federal) 501c3 status for the chapter.
Overall it seems better to use the one that's already in place.
There is a new type of process for organizations expecting to make less
than $50k a
year which is nearly instant.
Of course I don't know what/how bad these
headaches are:
"inherited bureaucratic headaches from ooc (old-omni entity)"
I second jorrit on using the old entity, as long
as it our lawyer gives
us
the OK. It seems like the easier option. And our
bylaws need a rewrite
anyway, maybe this would be a good reason to give them a once over?
-grant
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Jorrit Poelen <jhpoelen(a)xs4all.nl>
wrote:
> I'd be for recycling the old entity if
the paperwork is not too crazy
and
> that the mission is tailored to what
sudomesh does.
> On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 13:34 -0700, Jenny
Ryan wrote:
> Should we:
> 1) take over omni's old 501c3? -or-
> 2) submit our own application for 501c3 status?
>
> *1) - take over omni's old 501c3?*
> (a) It doesn't have a purpose at the moment, and we worked hella hard
on
> procuring it. was a long-form application,
so has already been
rigorously
> reviewed by the irs.
<snip>
_______________________________________________
mesh mailing list
mesh(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/mesh
3079
days inactive
3080
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Eve Edelson -
Marc Juul