25 May
2015
25 May
'15
11 p.m.
Hello!
On 26. 05. 2015 01:02, max b wrote:
However, if I ping over the tunnel and through the
exit server I get the
slower times:
Did you also try pinging just the other tunnel endpoint, without routing
through the exit server?
Thoughts? I'll keep taking a look at it, and
it's possible it has something
to do with our up hook on the exit server which adds the new l2tp interface
to babel, but wanted to put it out there in case anyone had any ideas.
This looks really strange. So you are adding each l2tp interface to
Babel? I see that you made some patches to enable dynamic interface
modifications? Was there any suspicious tunneldigger CPU usage? Are you
using any kind of traffic shaping?
Because as data forwarding goes exclusively over the kernel's L2TP
implementation, I don't see why removing and re-creating a tunnel would
improve latency.
Jernej