http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/14/technology/privacy-fears-as-surveillance-…
October 13, 2013
Privacy Fears as Surveillance Grows in Cities
By SOMINI SENGUPTA
OAKLAND, Calif. — Federal grants of $7 million awarded to this city
were meant largely to help thwart terror attacks at its bustling port.
But instead, the money is going to a police initiative that will
collect and analyze reams of surveillance data from around town — from
gunshot-detection sensors in the barrios of East Oakland to license
plate readers mounted on police cars patrolling the city’s upscale
hills.
The new system, scheduled to begin next summer, is the latest example
of how cities are compiling and processing large amounts of
information, known as big data, for routine law enforcement. And the
system underscores how technology has enabled the tracking of people
in many aspects of life.
The police can monitor a fire hose of social media posts to look for
evidence of criminal activities; transportation agencies can track
commuters’ toll payments when drivers use an electronic pass; and the
National Security Agency, as news reports this summer revealed,
scooped up telephone records of millions of cellphone customers in the
United States.
Like the Oakland effort, other pushes to use new surveillance tools in
law enforcement are supported with federal dollars. The New York
Police Department, aided by federal financing, has a big data system
that links 3,000 surveillance cameras with license plate readers,
radiation sensors, criminal databases and terror suspect lists. Police
in Massachusetts have used federal money to buy automated license
plate scanners. And police in Texas have bought a drone with homeland
security money, something that Alameda County, which Oakland is part
of, also tried but shelved after public protest.
Proponents of the Oakland initiative, formally known as the Domain
Awareness Center, say it will help the police reduce the city’s
notoriously high crime rates. But critics say the program, which will
create a central repository of surveillance information, will also
gather data about the everyday movements and habits of law-abiding
residents, raising legal and ethical questions about tracking people
so closely.
Libby Schaaf, an Oakland City Council member, said that because of the
city’s high crime rate, “it’s our responsibility to take advantage of
new tools that become available.” She added, though, that the center
would be able to “paint a pretty detailed picture of someone’s
personal life, someone who may be innocent.”
For example, if two men were caught on camera at the port stealing
goods and driving off in a black Honda sedan, Oakland authorities
could look up where in the city the car had been in the last several
weeks. That could include stoplights it drove past each morning and
whether it regularly went to see Oakland A’s baseball games.
For law enforcement, data mining is a big step toward more complete
intelligence gathering. The police have traditionally made arrests
based on small bits of data — witness testimony, logs of license plate
readers, footage from a surveillance camera perched above a bank
machine. The new capacity to collect and sift through all that
information gives the authorities a much broader view of the people
they are investigating.
For the companies that make big data tools, projects like Oakland’s
are a big business opportunity. Microsoft built the technology for the
New York City program. I.B.M. has sold data-mining tools for Las Vegas
and Memphis.
Oakland has a contract with the Science Applications International
Corporation, or SAIC, to build its system. That company has earned the
bulk of its $12 billion in annual revenue from military contracts. As
the federal military budget has fallen, though, SAIC has diversified
to other government agency projects, though not without problems.
The company’s contract to help modernize the New York City payroll
system, using new technology like biometric readers, resulted in
reports of kickbacks. Last year, the company paid the city $500
million to avoid a federal prosecution. The amount was believed to be
the largest ever paid to settle accusations of government contract
fraud. SAIC declined to comment.
Even before the initiative, Oakland spent millions of dollars on
traffic cameras, license plate readers and a network of sound sensors
to pick up gunshots. Still, the city has one of the highest violent
crime rates in the country. And an internal audit in August 2012 found
that the police had spent $1.87 million on technology tools that did
not work properly or remained unused because their vendors had gone
out of business.
The new center will be far more ambitious. From a central location, it
will electronically gather data around the clock from a variety of
sensors and databases, analyze that data and display some of the
information on a bank of giant monitors.
The city plans to staff the center around the clock. If there is an
incident, workers can analyze the many sources of data to give leads
to the police, fire department or Coast Guard. In the absence of an
incident, how the data would be used and how long it would be kept
remain largely unclear.
The center will collect feeds from cameras at the port, traffic
cameras, license plate readers and gunshot sensors. The center will
also be integrated next summer with a database that allows police to
tap into reports of 911 calls. Renee Domingo, the city’s emergency
services coordinator, said school surveillance cameras, as well as
video data from the regional commuter rail system and state highways,
may be added later.
Far less advanced surveillance programs have elicited resistance at
the local and state level. Iowa City, for example, recently imposed a
moratorium on some surveillance devices, including license plate
readers. The Seattle City Council forced its police department to
return a federally financed drone to the manufacturer.
In Virginia, the state police purged a database of millions of license
plates collected by cameras, including some at political rallies,
after the state’s attorney general said the method of collecting and
saving the data violated state law. But for a cash-starved city like
Oakland, the expectation of more federal financing makes the project
particularly attractive. The City Council approved the program in late
July, but public outcry later compelled the council to add
restrictions. The council instructed public officials to write a
policy detailing what kind of data could be collected and protected,
and how it could be used. The council expects the privacy policy to be
ready before the center can start operations.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California described
the program as “warrantless surveillance” and said “the city would be
able to collect and stockpile comprehensive information about Oakland
residents who have engaged in no wrongdoing.”
The port’s chief security officer, Michael O’Brien, sought to allay
fears, saying the center was meant to hasten law-enforcement response
time to crimes and emergencies. “It’s not to spy on people,” he said.
Steve Spiker, research and technology director at the Urban Strategies
Council, an Oakland nonprofit organization that has examined the
effectiveness of police technology tools, said he was uncomfortable
with city officials knowing so much about his movements. But, he said,
there is already so much public data that it makes sense to enable
government officials to collect and analyze it for the public good.
Still, he would like to know how all that data would be kept and
shared. “What happens,” he wondered, “when someone doesn’t like me and
has access to all that information?”
This is really rad!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lindsey Boldt <lindsbo(a)gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM
Subject: {BayAreaPublicSchool} After School Tutoring @ The Holdout
To: bayareapublicschool(a)googlegroups.com
Hey BAPSters,
Do folks already know that The Holdout Social Center (http://theholdout.org/)
is now providing after school tutoring for youth? Very exciting! I know
some folks involved with BAPS have expressed an interest in working with
Oakland youth, especially in a non-school setting, so this would be a great
opportunity to do that. Tutors are needed and welcome.
They're currently offering homework help and youth programming "such as
Youth Power and Healthy Hoods" on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 3-6pm. Here's
a link to their fundraising page.
http://www.razoo.com/story/Holdout-Tutoring?referral_code=share
They're currently trying to raise money for books, supplies and healthy
snacks.
They're also looking for donations of: Nourishing Snacks, Pencils/ Pens/
Paper, Books, Crayons/ Colored Pencils, Scissors/ Glue, AND tutors!
I personally have not been over to check it out yet, but am excited by the
prospect of a radical space like The Holdout offering something as
necessary as homework help to the immediate community surrounding its
space. So cool!
All best and happy weekend all,
Lindsey
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to the Bay Area Public School email list
To post to this group, send email to bayareapublicschool(a)googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bayareapublicschool+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. For more options, visit
this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/bayareapublicschool?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"BayAreaPublicSchool" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to bayareapublicschool+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
currently noisebridge is used by 99% non-Members, 1% Members.
currently, 99% of noisebridge Members do not use noisebridge.
currently, Membership at noisebridge requires ongoing cash flow into
noisebridge either by tradition or rules, it is not clear which.
I think this is not working out. Noisebridge's rent gets paid but the
people who come to noisebridge have zero motivation to become a member,
and so they don't bother. We should be adding several new members weekly.
Membership at Noisebridge should be a valuable tool to encourage
cooperation and a sense of belonging, while reinforcing accountability
and support between users of the space (including Members and Guests)
There is no reason for membership to be tied to giving money to
noisebridge. If someone is excellent and wants to be a part of
noisebridge, and no Member blocks them, they should be allowed to join.
Members should remain in good standing regardless of their financial
contributions as long as they are remaining excellent and accountable for
their actions, and those of their guests.
I propose that Noisebridge change the rules of Membership to do away with
the cash flow requirement, and to expressly do away with the informal and
inappropriate "bribe", which defeats the purpose of asking the potential
member to step out while their membership is consensed upon _or_not_.
We agreed last week to close noisebridge to non-Members from 23:00 to
10:00 every day, with the exception of guests of Members and
Members-in-Application who have two signatures. We will be able to take
advantage of this policy by encouraging more SUPPORTERS of noisebridge to
become Members. We can do this by removing the payment requirement.
If people want to support Noisebridge with money, they should feel free to
do so, whether they are Members or not. If people want to support
Noisebridge with their presence, excellence, and accountability to one
another, they should feel free to do so, whether they are in a position to
supply cash or not. I think this should be obvious.
I ask that absentee Members, who have been unable or unmotivated to offer
their support in the form of their presence, excellence, and
accountability, please stand aside from this proposal if they have
objections (or offer friendly amendments in the spirit of problem
solving). People who are not regularly using the space should not stand
in the way of improvements to be made by those who do use and contribute
to the space regularly.
The proposal should be worded as follows:
Membership to Noisebridge should no longer be dependant on a person's
ability or willingness to pay money to noisebridge, or to bring food or
beer to a meeting, but only on their ability to acquire sponsorship
signatures and be consensed upon at a meeting, after leaving the meeting
to give opportunity for any objections to be discussed before they return.
Members will thus enter and remain in good standing without regard to any
financial contributions they do or do not make in that time.
-jake
I got ya'll a table, so just show up with stuff to table with.
i'm not going to be at tonight's meeting but people should talk about
what should go on the table and if you wanted to share it with other
hackerspaces.
http://eastbayanarchist.com/
i have one in storage, it works and i am pretty sure it is available for
the following offer. it is well worth it should vast copies of *some
awesome sudoroomian publication* need duplication. fraction of a penny per
pAge. get in touch; i cannot personally transport it at this time (both
because I haven't the truck and due to physical limitations) but AFAIK it
can be set up *in situ*.
for b&w copies, at least for the first rationally sized run, just add
paper (no i cannot define rationally at the moment; but i can certainly
find out).
--
*Be seeing you.*
CA Senate Bill SB-255 - now §647(j)(4) as of Oct. 1 - is first 'revenge porn' law in the US.
Eric Goldman (awesome Santa Clara Law prof) has an interesting analysis on the legal implications - http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericgoldman/2013/10/08/californias-new-law-show….
If anyone has some technical observations or other feedback, I'd be interested to hear other takes on this. Seems like a very tricky socio-technical problem.
§647
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group=00001-01000…
> 647. Except as provided in subdivision (l), every person who
> commits any of the following acts is guilty of disorderly conduct, a
> misdemeanor:
> (a) Who solicits anyone to engage in or who engages in lewd or
> dissolute conduct in any public place or in any place open to the
> public or exposed to public view.
> (b) Who solicits or who agrees to engage in or who engages in any
> act of prostitution. A person agrees to engage in an act of
> prostitution when, with specific intent to so engage, he or she
> manifests an acceptance of an offer or solicitation to so engage,
> regardless of whether the offer or solicitation was made by a person
> who also possessed the specific intent to engage in prostitution. No
> agreement to engage in an act of prostitution shall constitute a
> violation of this subdivision unless some act, in addition to the
> agreement, is done within this state in furtherance of the commission
> of an act of prostitution by the person agreeing to engage in that
> act. As used in this subdivision, "prostitution" includes any lewd
> act between persons for money or other consideration.
> (c) Who accosts other persons in any public place or in any place
> open to the public for the purpose of begging or soliciting alms.
> (d) Who loiters in or about any toilet open to the public for the
> purpose of engaging in or soliciting any lewd or lascivious or any
> unlawful act.
> (e) Who lodges in any building, structure, vehicle, or place,
> whether public or private, without the permission of the owner or
> person entitled to the possession or in control of it.
> (f) Who is found in any public place under the influence of
> intoxicating liquor, any drug, controlled substance, toluene, or any
> combination of any intoxicating liquor, drug, controlled substance,
> or toluene, in a condition that he or she is unable to exercise care
> for his or her own safety or the safety of others, or by reason of
> his or her being under the influence of intoxicating liquor, any
> drug, controlled substance, toluene, or any combination of any
> intoxicating liquor, drug, or toluene, interferes with or obstructs
> or prevents the free use of any street, sidewalk, or other public
> way.
> (g) When a person has violated subdivision (f), a peace officer,
> if he or she is reasonably able to do so, shall place the person, or
> cause him or her to be placed, in civil protective custody. The
> person shall be taken to a facility, designated pursuant to Section
> 5170 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, for the 72-hour treatment
> and evaluation of inebriates. A peace officer may place a person in
> civil protective custody with that kind and degree of force which
> would be lawful were he or she effecting an arrest for a misdemeanor
> without a warrant. No person who has been placed in civil protective
> custody shall thereafter be subject to any criminal prosecution or
> juvenile court proceeding based on the facts giving rise to this
> placement. This subdivision shall not apply to the following persons:
> (1) Any person who is under the influence of any drug, or under
> the combined influence of intoxicating liquor and any drug.
> (2) Any person who a peace officer has probable cause to believe
> has committed any felony, or who has committed any misdemeanor in
> addition to subdivision (f).
> (3) Any person who a peace officer in good faith believes will
> attempt escape or will be unreasonably difficult for medical
> personnel to control.
> (h) Who loiters, prowls, or wanders upon the private property of
> another, at any time, without visible or lawful business with the
> owner or occupant. As used in this subdivision, "loiter" means to
> delay or linger without a lawful purpose for being on the property
> and for the purpose of committing a crime as opportunity may be
> discovered.
> (i) Who, while loitering, prowling, or wandering upon the private
> property of another, at any time, peeks in the door or window of any
> inhabited building or structure, without visible or lawful business
> with the owner or occupant.
> (j) (1) Any person who looks through a hole or opening, into, or
> otherwise views, by means of any instrumentality, including, but not
> limited to, a periscope, telescope, binoculars, camera, motion
> picture camera, camcorder, or mobile phone, the interior of a
> bedroom, bathroom, changing room, fitting room, dressing room, or
> tanning booth, or the interior of any other area in which the
> occupant has a reasonable expectation of privacy, with the intent to
> invade the privacy of a person or persons inside. This subdivision
> shall not apply to those areas of a private business used to count
> currency or other negotiable instruments.
> (2) Any person who uses a concealed camcorder, motion picture
> camera, or photographic camera of any type, to secretly videotape,
> film, photograph, or record by electronic means, another,
> identifiable person under or through the clothing being worn by that
> other person, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the
> undergarments worn by, that other person, without the consent or
> knowledge of that other person, with the intent to arouse, appeal to,
> or gratify the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person and
> invade the privacy of that other person, under circumstances in which
> the other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
> (3) (A) Any person who uses a concealed camcorder, motion picture
> camera, or photographic camera of any type, to secretly videotape,
> film, photograph, or record by electronic means, another,
> identifiable person who may be in a state of full or partial undress,
> for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn
> by, that other person, without the consent or knowledge of that other
> person, in the interior of a bedroom, bathroom, changing room,
> fitting room, dressing room, or tanning booth, or the interior of any
> other area in which that other person has a reasonable expectation
> of privacy, with the intent to invade the privacy of that other
> person.
> (B) Neither of the following is a defense to the crime specified
> in this paragraph:
> (i) The defendant was a cohabitant, landlord, tenant, cotenant,
> employer, employee, or business partner or associate of the victim,
> or an agent of any of these.
> (ii) The victim was not in a state of full or partial undress.
> (k) In any accusatory pleading charging a violation of subdivision
> (b), if the defendant has been once previously convicted of a
> violation of that subdivision, the previous conviction shall be
> charged in the accusatory pleading. If the previous conviction is
> found to be true by the jury, upon a jury trial, or by the court,
> upon a court trial, or is admitted by the defendant, the defendant
> shall be imprisoned in a county jail for a period of not less than 45
> days and shall not be eligible for release upon completion of
> sentence, on probation, on parole, on work furlough or work release,
> or on any other basis until he or she has served a period of not less
> than 45 days in a county jail. In all cases in which probation is
> granted, the court shall require as a condition thereof that the
> person be confined in a county jail for at least 45 days. In no event
> does the court have the power to absolve a person who violates this
> subdivision from the obligation of spending at least 45 days in
> confinement in a county jail.
> In any accusatory pleading charging a violation of subdivision
> (b), if the defendant has been previously convicted two or more times
> of a violation of that subdivision, each of these previous
> convictions shall be charged in the accusatory pleading. If two or
> more of these previous convictions are found to be true by the jury,
> upon a jury trial, or by the court, upon a court trial, or are
> admitted by the defendant, the defendant shall be imprisoned in a
> county jail for a period of not less than 90 days and shall not be
> eligible for release upon completion of sentence, on probation, on
> parole, on work furlough or work release, or on any other basis until
> he or she has served a period of not less than 90 days in a county
> jail. In all cases in which probation is granted, the court shall
> require as a condition thereof that the person be confined in a
> county jail for at least 90 days. In no event does the court have the
> power to absolve a person who violates this subdivision from the
> obligation of spending at least 90 days in confinement in a county
> jail.
> In addition to any punishment prescribed by this section, a court
> may suspend, for not more than 30 days, the privilege of the person
> to operate a motor vehicle pursuant to Section 13201.5 of the Vehicle
> Code for any violation of subdivision (b) that was committed within
> 1,000 feet of a private residence and with the use of a vehicle. In
> lieu of the suspension, the court may order a person's privilege to
> operate a motor vehicle restricted, for not more than six months, to
> necessary travel to and from the person's place of employment or
> education. If driving a motor vehicle is necessary to perform the
> duties of the person's employment, the court may also allow the
> person to drive in that person's scope of employment.
> (l) (1) A second or subsequent violation of subdivision (j) is
> punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year,
> or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both
> that fine and imprisonment.
> (2) If the victim of a violation of subdivision (j) was a minor at
> the time of the offense, the violation is punishable by imprisonment
> in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding
> two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
>
>
"Today I Learned" has leveled up to "Today We Learned"!
We've had a lot of fun at TILs and other events (open hack nights at LOL
makerspace <http://pocmakerspace.org/>!) learning together informally, so
we're trying out a new format for Saturday afternoons - open co-learning
with time available for people to give workshops, present things they're
working on, etc.
>From the wiki <https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Today_We_Learned>:
Hi everyone! We're trying out a new experiment in co-learning.
*two hours of time*
Every Saturday from 2PM to 4PM (but really till whenever) in the common
area of Sudo Room.
*to learn together*
We get to figure out what that means. What's most useful to us? What do we
want to learn? What do we want to share? How do we want to do this?
*with minimal, optional coordination beforehand*
https://pad.riseup.net/p/twl
This pad has the next TWL's date and a bunch of empty space. Share what
you're planning on working on; what you'd like to learn; if you'd like to
sign up to do a workshop, do it here; if you want to give a lightning talk
about some new thing you're working on/learning, post it here (you can even
post a time...like, "I'll be giving a short talk on some new things I've
been working on at 3PM").
We'll fill up the pad throughout the week and we'll clear it out after that
week's session so that we have a nice, fresh sheet for the following week.
You can share the pad with others to invite them to your workshop or to
work on a topic together (for example, you can post that you'll be learning
python <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Python_%28programming_language%29>and
then send this to everyone you know to say "hey! i'll be learning
python! if you want to work on python together, come join me!").
come tomorrow for the first one & add what you want to learn/plan to work
on on the pad: https://pad.riseup.net/p/twl!
- Marina
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: George <travology(a)mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:46:10 -0700
Subject: Fw: [Long Now Members] Manual for Civilization
To: Matthew Senate <mattsenate(a)gmail.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: Alexander Rose
To: members(a)list.longnow.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 10:57 AM
Subject: [Long Now Members] Manual for Civilization
Long Now Members,
Please help us find the most useful books in the world...
We have begun an effort to populate our upcoming book collection for
the Salon called The Manual for Civilization. This will be the 3500
books you would most want if you had to restart civilization.
So.. If you were stranded on a desert island, what books will YOU
pick? Come on, be honest (and selective).
Behold the ONE TRUE GOOGLE FORM. We have made strides to make it as
easy as possible to make submissions. Our main identifier is an
Amazon URL which will later be parsed by a massive child labor force
in a secret underground bunker into things like ISBN and book size
etc.
But right now we are trying to grow the list as broad as possible with
amazing selections. Dont get too hung up on details or categories,
just make good submissions. There will be a later vetting process
that will be more fun that playing "Hot or Not" in 01998.
Ready, set, go..! (dont forget to bookmark this page so you can come
back to it as you think of more books later)
--
Alexander Rose
Long Now executive director
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Members mailing list
unsubscribe / change email: http://list.longnow.org/mailman/listinfo/members
*** Living the fabulous life, free(ish) of the clutches of the Mon$ter of
Mone¥? *****
Join us as we scoff together over coffee and speak on a wide range of
superfluous topics, including but not limited to:
<<Government benefits we qualify for given our current situations
<<How we make use of our time in a meaningful way
<<“Third Economy”: Bartering/free exchange, gifting, sharing,
bottom-feeding,…
<<…and *whatever else you want to bring to the table*!
This is a time to relax, speak our minds, and enjoy each other’s company!
COFFEE AND TEA WILL BE SERVED!!! Bring a snack if you’d like. :]
♥,
ykciV
Dear friends from other organizations,
We just wanted to give you a brief update on what we've been doing,
hopefully you can pass it along to your respective organizations. The
resolution project is in slow motion, as is the shareholder proposal
project. There is a Rally Against Mass Surveillance in DC on October 26th,
and we are raising money to send Bay Area residents to the rally by train,
https://www.wepay.com/donations/restore-the-fourth-sf-bay-area-1026-rally-f…
Our checking account is with the Internet Archive's credit union, which we
think is really cool!
We're not able to give a location for the local 10/26 activities just yet,
but we know it will be from 9 am to 12 pm.
Two other upcoming privacy events: Sudoroom's monthly cryptoparty is on Oct
20th
https://sudoroom.org/ai1ec_event/cryptoparty-a-digital-security-privacy-wor…
we will be presenting at the Aaron Swartz Hackathon Nov 8-10.
http://aaronswartzhackathon.org/
Best,
Alice
Legal Advisor
Restore the Fourth SF Bay Area
http://www.restorethefourthsf.com/
there are only four of us here, for the weekly meeting.
we had an initial vote on whether or not we should have a minimum of 10 people in order to make an official meeting; and that we call it a sudo-minyan.
the result of the vote was 2 votes yes, 2 abstentions.
sent from eddan.com
Is Sudo Room planning a booth a East Bay Mini Maker Faire, weekend after
next? If so - any idea where you'll be located?
The EBMMF is much smaller, more intimate, and has much more of a community
feel than the giant San Mateo Maker Faire. Typically lots more families as
well. Different atmosphere, but just as much creative fun - strongly
recommended!
We'll have a booth for Counter Culture Labs (I did a booth for BioCurious
the past two years). Use code CCLAB for a 15% discount off you ticket. Last
year, we were in the same room as Ace Monster Toys, Tekla Labs, and Hacker
Moms - great neighbors!
Patrik
November 15 is the date of the main even that we need a space for. There are other events in October.
Yall should come on the tour de ferment if you got bikes.
Patrick
> From: Catherine Bracy <catherinebracy(a)gmail.com>
> Date: October 9, 2013 at 3:06:23 PM PDT
> Subject: [berkmanfriends] Code for America Oakland project: public records requests
>
> Hi Berkfriends,
>
> Our Code for America team in Oakland this year has built a pretty cool tool to streamline and make more transparent public records requests:
>
> http://www.codeforamerica.org/2013/10/01/recordtrac-easy-access-to-public-r…
>
> Some of you may be wondering how this is different from the FOIA Machine that the Center for Investigative Reporting is building after their successful Kickstarter campaign. I love their idea (I'm a backer, in fact) but RecordTrac serves both the citizen AND the government entity. Turns out many times the slowness in responses to FOIA requests isn't nefarious it just happens to be a real pain in the ass for government employees. RecordTrac makes it easier, and allows employees and requestors to have a conversation about the process.
>
> If anyone wants to know more (or even wants to help redeploy it somewhere else!) I'm happy to connect you with the team.
>
> Catherine Bracy
> Organizing and Engagement Director
> Code for America
> ----------
I found myself responding as i did, below, to news of a sudo table at the
east bay anarchist bookfair, and realized how ... happy i am to be alive
.... grateful i am for the same, and for the people i know. like you, if
indeed i know you, o person reading this.
possible trigger of this state of mind:
*i danced on monday like ... like i could just.... dance. *
*
*
*like i used to, a few years ago, when i didn't know that a daily fight
just to walk had an appointment with my internet-surfing, philosophizing,
needing-to-write-more self.*
*
*
*i danced! i danced! i got drunk and forgot i was lame! i ddn't hurt
myself! I danced! *
*
*
*:::::::dances around a little in virtual demonstration:::::::*
*
*
*wooooooohooooooooooooooo!*
*
*
ok. so i thought would say something. perhaps i can make it tonight....
SHORT VERSION:
inspiration; thx.
anticipate updates eagerly.
LONG VERSION, warning, may not make attempt to be brief:
to be regarded as that which serves to remind any but the most negligent in
attantion to spiritual duty of the glory immanent in and attendant upon the
quotidian externality: intersections juxtapose, for me, details such as
audio accompaniment and my awesome cup of coffee with the news that HTML5
browsers are soon to compile draconian DRM in at the source and this.
the fact that i managed an APA for a few years is evidence (to my
allzu-menschliches yet voluble self, that is) that this email is aware, has
intentions, and, of course, specifies, would benefit from, indeed
needs *me* somehow.
sketching beautiful futures branching off.
not that i know what that exactly is... but i felt that the word 'awesome'
furnished far too little detail.
good afternoon! it's good to be alive.
--
*Be seeing you.*
Some major Internet Governance organizations earlier this week put out a statement on future Internet cooperation that I think Sudo folk might be interested in.
http://www.internetsociety.org/news/montevideo-statement-future-internet-co…
(signatories & other info at link above)
> Uruguay, 7 October 2013
> The leaders of organizations responsible for coordination of the Internet technical infrastructure globally have met in Montevideo, Uruguay, to consider current issues affecting the future of the Internet.
>
> The Internet and World Wide Web have brought major benefits in social and economic development worldwide. Both have been built and governed in the public interest through unique mechanisms for global multistakeholder Internet cooperation, which have been intrinsic to their success. The leaders discussed the clear need to continually strengthen and evolve these mechanisms, in truly substantial ways, to be able to address emerging issues faced by stakeholders in the Internet.
>
> In this sense:
>
> They reinforced the importance of globally coherent Internet operations, and warned against Internet fragmentation at a national level. They expressed strong concern over the undermining of the trust and confidence of Internet users globally due to recent revelations of pervasive monitoring and surveillance.
> They identified the need for ongoing effort to address Internet Governance challenges, and agreed to catalyze community-wide efforts towards the evolution of global multistakeholder Internet cooperation.
> They called for accelerating the globalization of ICANN and IANA functions, towards an environment in which all stakeholders, including all governments, participate on an equal footing.
> They also called for the transition to IPv6 to remain a top priority globally. In particular Internet content providers must serve content with both IPv4 and IPv6 services, in order to be fully reachable on the global Internet.
Thanks, Nerds for Nature (nerds, for short?), for your donation. Very much appreciated.
If any other groups are also moved to donate to Sudo Room for their past and future use and enjoyment of the space - it would be of great help.
> 1) online (via wepay): https://sudoroom.org/
> 2) online (via gittip): https://www.gittip.com/sudoroom/
> 3) in person (anytime): please drop cash or checks into the clear plastic
> box by the door that goes to the elevator
> 4) in person (at meetings): bring cash or checks to wed. meetings.
>
>> From: Victoria Bogdan <bogdan.victoria(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: [nerdsfornature] Donation to SudoRoom!
>> Date: September 26, 2013 11:52:05 AM PDT
>> To: "nerdsfornature(a)googlegroups.com" <nerdsfornature(a)googlegroups.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Senate <mattsenate(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just a note to say that as approved by the Organizing Group at our last meeting, Nerds for Nature made a $100 donation to SudoRoom in gratitude for use of their space!
>>
>> The receipt is below. If anyone is curious about our financial standing, there is a doc here. We have $709 left from our fundraiser income.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> V.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: WePay.com <support(a)wepay.com>
>> Date: Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:42 AM
>> Subject: Payment confirmation
>> To: bogdan.victoria(a)gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Victoria,
>> You’ve made a $105.20 payment for sudo room
>>
>> This charge will appear on your statement as “WPY*sudo room”
>>
>> Campaign Name Amount
>> sudo room $100.00
>> Service Fee $5.20
>> Total $105.20
>> Payment Method
>> Visa xxxxxx8550
>> Time
>> 09/26/2013 at 02:40 PM EDT
>> Dispute this payment
>> If you’re unhappy with this payment, dispute it through WePay.
>> Dispute
>> To turn off notifications you can visit your Settings page.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> __
>>
>>
>>
>> victoriabogdan.com
>>
>
The annual Ferment Change event series is happening this month and next. We are looking for a venue for the main event on November 15th. In the past we've had it at the humanist hall. They raised thier rates a good bit. Could Sudo Room and the Public school host our main event the potluck & culture swap? I posted the upcoming events below.
Patrick
October 12, 2013
Indigenous People's Day- Ferment Change!
Start Time: 11:00 am
Ends: 3:00 pm
Description: Fermented food workshops and samples from around the world to
celebrate Indigenous People's Day including a Nepalese Fermentation Workshop, a maya-aztec fermentation workshop, and an Ethiopian bread workshop (Injera)
More info to come...
More details
October 19, 2013
Kombucha! Workshop and Swap
Start Time: 11:00 am
Ends: 1:00 pm
Description: We will have a 1 hour kombucha workshop followed by Kombucha Swap.
Bring your kombucha by for others to taste and come pickup a new mother!
More details
October 26, 2013
Ferment Change! Kim Chi w/Phat Beets Youth
Start Time: 11:00 am
Ends: 1:00 pm
Description: Join Lorena, a Fresh Felllow from the Phat Beets Produce Youth Program in making this traditional Korean Pickle made from napa cabbage, carrots, gingers and more! Lorena will provide samples and bring a jar so you can make and take some home with you!
More details
And more fun activities...
Tour De Fermet- a homebrewers bicycle tour of the East Bay to benefit Phat Beets Produce
$20-$50 (per day)
Oct 26th and Oct 27th All day
more info email info(a)phatbeetsproduce.org
Ferment Change Potluck and Culture Swap n' Workshops Friday Nov 15th
Oakland, Ca.
more info to come!
Hi Sudo folk.
The public comment period just opened for the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) - which will determine the reporting (minimum) guidelines for the Info Tech space. These new sets of industry-specific standards SASB has started publishing will likely become the accounting norms for sustainability.
If anyone is interested in working with me on putting together comments by Jan. 2, 2014 - I could probably use the help.
Thanks.
sent from eddan.com
> From: "Comments @ SASB" <comments(a)sasb.org>
> Subject: Public Comment for Technology & Communications
> Date: October 8, 2013 12:38:15 PM PDT
>
> 90-Day Period of Public Comment Now Open
> Technology & Communications
> SASB Exposure Draft Sustainability Accounting Standards
>
> Comment Deadline: January 2, 2014
>
> The proposed sustainability accounting standards for industries in the Technology & Communications sector are now available for public review. SASB welcomes comments from the public.
>
> Those providing comments should consider that the proposed disclosure standards are intended to be integrated in financial filings of publicly-traded companies, such as the Form 10-K. As such, they must reflect auditable information that is material to investors and can be collected by corporations in a cost-efficient manner.
>
> The industries covered in the Technology and Communications sector are:
> Electronic Manufacturing Services & Original Design Manufacturing
> Software & IT Services
> Hardware
> Semiconductors
> Telecommunications
> Internet Media & Services
>
> To access the exposure drafts, and for instructions on how to submit comments, please click here.
>
> Thank you for your involvement in the development of these important standards.
>