26 Oct
2013
26 Oct
'13
5:36 p.m.
I don't know if I'm obliged to reply to the entire list with this, but I
respectfully decline the nomination. <<;
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Eddan Katz <eddan(a)clear.net> wrote:
I'd like to help out with this research - to
compare and contrast the
different insurance agreements, in regards to terms and conditions.
A sample of groups that include heavy machinery, bio-hacking, kids
programs, and eCommerce (products & services) would be the ideal for the
essential stuff we'd need to worry about.
It would be very useful to do some kind of mash-up overlapping this
comparative chart with the ongoing Oakland zoning conditions research. I
know there have been various efforts - does anyone have a sense of where to
find this information?
sent from eddan.com
On Oct 26, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Marc Juul <juul(a)labitat.dk> wrote:
To those of you wondering how much liability you'd be taking on, here's a
short summary:
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/nonprofit-directors-personal-liabili…
This assumes that sudo room has liability insurance, which should be top
priority as soon we are incorporated (getting liability was a primary
motivator for becoming incorporated in the first place.
Who wants to take on the task of researching hacker space liability
insurance? I suggested contacting a few other California hackerspaces and
asking about their insurance policy and pricing and bringing that info to
the upcoming weekly meeting.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:24 AM, David Keenan <dkeenan44(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I missed this meeting and most sudo general due
to a public school class
at the same time.. not sure if this disqualifies me from weighing in, or if
some i nominate have perhaps already precluded/disinclined themselves from
being nominated, but i thought I would add my 2c here, (which y'all are
also free to totally disregard if course if needs be) -
Marc (marcjc)
Matt (mattsenate)
Jenny (tunabananas)
Jordan (yardena)
Marina (mk30)
J.C. (r33lmm)
On Thursday, October 24, 2013, Max Klein wrote:
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
Eddan, that is flattering, I accept nomination.
notconfusing
On 24 October 2013 15:18, Eddan Katz <eddan(a)clear.net> wrote:
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
Not sure whether or not it's necessary under
the process Yardena
described, but I second Max's nominations for the Board.
I also hereby nominate Max (notconfusing) for the Board as well.
Is there a particular number we're shooting for in terms of the Board?
For reference on what a non-profit Board does (assuming an active
board, which I understand currently is not what we want) - the Nolo Press
page at
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/building-nonprofits-board-30046.html… useful, I
think.
sent from eddan.com
On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Max Klein <isalix(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I Max (notconfusing), nominate Jordan (yardena), Marina (mk30), Vicky
(ykciv), Liberty (thattechgirl), Kare (kkr), and Jenny (tunabananas) for
board membership.
On 23 October 2013 21:05, Yardena Cohen <yardenack(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> At tonight's meeting there was consensus that we should move forward
> with these articles as they are. So for our purposes right now, they
> are officially ratified:
> https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Incorporation
>
> Unfortunately, this entails a Board of Directors. So far no viable
> legal hacks have appeared to work around this. So the next detail we
> need to tackle is exactly WHO will be on this Board. We decided that
> the most legitimate way to do this is to let the mailing list nominate
> names to a list, confirm they are willing, and then consent on the
> list of names, to address any potential disagreements or conflicts.
>
> Please use this thread to nominate yourselves or others to be on our
> Board of Directors. Remember, this position requires your name on
> official government paperwork, will come with legal liability, and
> will be constructed with as little actual power as possible.
>
> Hopefully this will be settled by next week's meeting (Oct 30), at
> which point we can actually drive to Sacramento and file!
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss