Thomas,
I dislike gyms and basically exercising indoors (i generally like to feel
the wind in my face and hopefully see some trees, or perhaps an empty
swimming pool, when im out excercisin'). But: I think your proposal re: the
math group & it's social/mental space is completely fantastic!
To me Romance & Method sounds funner than just 'Math Lab'; maybe it could
be called Method & Romance Math Lab?
Thank you and I will try to come to some of these -
Also you should check out Loïc Wacquant's very cool ethnography / on boxing
gyms in Chicago, 'Body & Soul', he also had some great sociology on boxing
I believe it's called 'The Pugilistic Point if View..'
Best!
David
On Wednesday, October 2, 2013, Anthony Di Franco wrote:
Marina, sorry to hear about your bad experiences at
gyms.
I'd like to recommend the Orinda crossfit gym if you are still looking. I
only went for a month when a friend bought me a trial membership, but I
remember that it was owned and operated by a woman and attendance and
leadership was gender-balanced and this seemed to flow directly out of the
collegial spirit that Tom is inspired by. I never observed and cannot
imagine there men disrespecting women on a gender basis or anyone
disrespecting anyone on any basis for that matter — it was to the core a
gathering of peers. I favored the power lifting classes and they were not
exceptions to any of this.
I hope that if morning math continues to be inspired by athletic
collegiality it will be in the tradition of gyms like this one that don't
view physical exertion in terms of gender stereotypes as being a distinctly
male thing. I also hope that we don't perpetuate such stereotypes in sudo
room.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Marina Kukso <marina.kukso(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
hey tom,
***wall of text incoming***
this is so cool and i really appreciate how well-thought-out and
well-written your proposal is for creating a safe math learning
environment. have you heard of the berkeley compass
project<http://www.berkeleycompassproject.org/>?
they work with physics freshmen at berkeley to help create a learning
support network in a program that's famous for serving a weeding out
function. also, if you are interested in readings about inclusive math
pedagogy, just let me know and i'll be happy to shower you with pdf's.
while i love some of the principles that you've outlined as being
productive social norms for learning based on the boxing gym metaphor, my
suggestion would be to consider not using the boxing gym metaphor in the
name of the group. my own perspective (and the perspective of many women i
know), is that boxing gyms are pretty heavily coded "MALE - do not enter
unless you want to be looked up and down, humiliated, and judged.". they're
up there with free weight rooms, mechanic shops, lumberyards, and hardware
stores. (to give a free weight example, when i was in college, it was so
bad that a friend and i would only go to the free weight room at the gym
together because the judging, humiliating looks and patronizing smiles were
just too much. we actually couldn't even focus on figuring out how to use
the machines because we were so preoccupied with the eyes on our backs.
women's bodies are subject to so much scrutiny by strangers all the fucking
time (i was harassed twice in the first 15 seconds of a run yesterday!)
that it was just not worth it to have to experience this degradation in
order to use this part of the gym, so after a couple times we never went
back).
i had no idea though that these were the social norms in boxing gyms -
everything that you shared is really instructive and definitely broke down
a lot of my misconceptions. it's entirely possible that boxing gyms aren't
at all like my image of them, that many of us women have unfair
misconceptions about what they're like, but if you use this metaphor,
you'll have to battle against that expectation. additionally, it's also
possible that your experience of the boxing gym space is shaped by your
experience as a man and that a woman might experience a boxing space
differently. i honestly have no idea whether that's the case and would love
to learn more about your experience with boxing gyms.
i wonder if others have similar thoughts about the boxing gym metaphor and
also ideas for other metaphors that might let people know that "this will
be a study group that supports you in your learning" (although you could
just call it "math study group" and list the "ground rules." or just
go
full hippie: "inclusive math study group.")
- marina
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Thomas Fitzpatrick <fitzsnaggle(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
If there are no objections, I'm reenstating Morning Math. I think a new
name is in order and would like to field a couple - Math Gym, Visceral
Mathematics, Romancing Methods...
Sessions will start at 7:30 AM. I will be staying and holding up the torch
until 11:30. Participants are free to come and go as the please between
those times on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursday (no pressure to show up on
all days, but I will be there) with the possibility of more days.
All levels are welcome - there will always be something to do. The vision
is that despite skill levels and relative experiences, we can all benefit
from contact with each other as Mathematicians.
My favorite learning environment is a boxing gym and I think that is where
our social norms should be derived from.
* Many different styles of boxing and training - trainers are free to take
on students, students can go to new trainers, or you can have no trainer
and get bits of advice from many people
* People arriving and leaving at dispar