28 May
2015
28 May
'15
6:21 p.m.
>Research shows that limitat...
I don't believe this. As a diagnosed aspie who had 1 friend in high school,
I've been able to overcome almost all such "ingrained disability" and have
left stellar impressions on hundreds of people. It's very, very possible
not only to moderately change your personality, but to become an entirely
different person altogether over the course of a year.
> As a small child I received a severe concussion
and was unconscious for
some time after the accident... facial expressions...
As a small child who recovered from getting tossed 6 feet in the air by a
car, completely KO'd, and had to relearn similar things, I can say, the
brain is *really, really freakin' adaptable*. But not if you don't put in
the hard effort to rewire those neurons.
---
Aperture Systems: Redefining Radiography - http://aperture.systems/
http://adammunich.com/ - Cell: +1-650-452-0554
Be • knowledgeable • social • patient • fearless • compassionate • fun •
humble • forgiving.
Be a leader
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Autonomous <autonomous666(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Consider the case where cognitive problems arise from
traumatic brain
injury. There's plenty of scientific evidence proving that due to a brain
injury, individuals may lack self-control and awareness, and as a result
may behave inappropriately or impulsively (without thinking it through) in
social situations.
http://www.brainline.org/content/2010/03/cognitive-problems-after-traumatic…
As a small child I received a severe concussion and was unconscious for
some time after the accident. When I look at photos of myself before and
after this accident I can clearly see something had changed with my facial
expressions. So be skeptical if you want but it does not diminish the fact
that many people suffer from "hardware problems."
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Cere Misc <cere.misc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Word Edward. I don't know what's
"true" about why we are the way we are
but there is a lot science cannot reducibly test and conclude.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
-- I have very little confidence in this kind of
research. Modern
science denies the existence of spirit, or @ least considers it not a
subject for science, & so ignores it, which usually amounts to denying it.
OTOH, emotional/spiritual experiences do have physical effects, so science,
in its prejudice, concludes that these physical signs are "the cause."
Rupert Sheldrake is the only guy I know of who has figgered this out, w/
the possible exception of Deepak Chopra. The result is a dead end that does
a *lot* of damage. One recent example of progress: British researchers (I
think) found that rat pups inherited conditioned fear: specifically: they
did a "Pavlov's dog" number w/ rose water & electric shocks so that
rats
got scared of the smell of rose water. Then they bred then, and found that
the children were scared of it before they had any training. This torpedoes
a sacred tenet of centuries' standing: acquired characteristics cannot be
inherited. But recent advances in instrumentation have shown that
experiences can generate molecules in the cell that turn off genes, & @
least some of these molecules can stay attached when the sperm or egg cells
split their DNA (instrument technology is just beginning to reveal this).
It's called "epigenetic inheritance."
The article came out in "Lancet" a few months ago, as I recall.
Nil Carborundum Illegitemi,
Ed Rippy
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss