sudo-discuss

sudo-discuss@sudoroom.org

5 participants
7410 discussions

THIS SAT 3/9: Today I Learned: Jewelry-Making and Jewelry Repair

by Marina Kukso

Please share widely!: *Jewelry-making and Jewelry Repair* Join us at Sudo Room this Saturday Mar. 9th at 2PM for a workshop on making and repairing jewelry. Bring broken and second hand jewelry plus any beads or other bits you have on hand and we will learn how to take apart old jewelry to make new creations. We will also have people on hand to help you repair any broken jewelry. Bring yourself and a friend, we’ll have snacks! Sudo Room is at 2141 Broadway (entrance on 22nd St., take the elevator upstairs). *This workshop is part of the series “Today I Learned,” a series of free workshops that take place every Saturday at 2PM at Sudo Room, a creative community and hackerspace in downtown Oakland. Check out the full schedule at sudoroom.org <http://sudoroom.org/wiki/Today_I_Learned>.*

12 years, 6 months

Invite and Notice Mon, Mar 11, 6:30-9:00pm at Sudo Room

by Matthew Senate

Hey all, The Community Democracy Project http://communitydemocracyproject.org/ is hosting a special meeting on Monday March 11th, with at least one (maybe a few) guest speakers. Please be advised that we will be using more of the room and producing more sound (as well as requiring a bit more quiet during presentation(s). We have coordinated with the JavaScript meetup and plan to follow up with the Public School as a heads-up. More info: *What*: Community building + demystifying the budget + CDP campaign 101 *Meet other CDP supporters and volunteers *"Oakland Budget 101" training from local budget experts and activists *Hear from other groups working toward local economic justice *Training on talking about the campaign, mobilizing others *When*: Monday, March 11. Starts promptly at 6:30, ends by 9. // Matt

12 years, 6 months

Re: [sudo-discuss] Dystopia Watch: Surveillance drones coming to a cafe near you.

by Anon195714

(Matthew: I see your comment was posted to me but not posted to list, so I've redacted it from this posting to the list, which is in reply to you. If you want to post your comment to the list, feel free. Everyone else: it wasn't a scathing criticism or something scandalous, in fact I think Matthew may have wanted to post it to list but didn't hit Reply All. That said, it's up to him.) The surveillance ecosystem is already enormous, and the vast majority is in the private sector. General rule: "Dissipative structures form ecosystems around entropy-gradients." Organisms are dissipative structures; work is energy-conversion. This explains much of human social behavior as well as physical ecosystem behavior. For example people want music and they're willing to work hard (convert energy) to get it. Energy conversion produces an entropy gradient. The music industry middlemen (RIAA) insert themselves into the path between sources & sinks (artists & audiences, and that relationship is two-way) to tap as much energy out of this process as possible, in the form of money. Illegal file downloaders as well as self-produced bands who use Creative Commons or Copyleft, are seen by the music industry as short-circuits in the system. Consumer behavior in general is an enormous energy source (money source), and the goal of capitalism is ultimately to surround every consumer with the equivalent of a Dyson sphere to capture as much of their work output as possible. The modern surveillance ecosystem is all about "predicting and controlling" individual behavior, toward that end. So, per Matthew, one way to counter this is to set up a countervailing ecosystem, with entropy gradients tilted in such a manner as to produce incentives to fight back against the surveillance. As for defending privacy: privacy is equivalent to free speech. As a lawyer told us when I was working on "crypto for the masses" in the early 1980s, the right to freedom of speech necessarily includes the right to choose your audience. Today we commonly use the term "chilling effect" to refer to what happens when you can't choose your audience, e.g. when your boss and the credit bureaux etc. are likely to be watching you on "social" networks. It's been said more than once, that you can tell when someone's boss is watching them on Facebook: all of a sudden their comments go totally bland (not that any of us should be using Facebook unless we're deliberately using it as a publicity tool for political or other campaigns). That's the chilling effect in action. And if DARPA and Google have their way, where everyone's every conversation, private and in-person included, is recorded and archived and made searchable, the chill will be so total that it will make life in East Germany under the Stasi look like a picnic by comparison. Knowledge is power: when THEY know all about YOU, but you know nothing about them, who has the power? As the old song said, "Getting to know you / getting to know all about you..." Not to mention, "He sees you when you're sleeping / he knows when you're awake. / He knows if you've been bad or good / so be good for (getting lots of presents) sake!" Going back thousands of years, societies envisioned deities as concerned with individual "moral behavior" (i.e. sex) as a way of strengthening tribal cohesion. Western cultures in particular evolved with the very strong sense that their deities were keeping a close watch over them. This gave people a sense of comfort and protection. Today as agnosticism, atheism, and various forms of transpersonal beliefs (in effect religion without personalized deities) are on the rise in the geek sector, the sense of comfort from "being watched over" has transplanted itself from the deity to the surveillance superstructure. Many people are secretly fond of the idea that Big Google is reading every word they write, listening to every phone call they make, and following them around. This is nothing more than a new deity taking the place of the old one: "someone big who watches over us." It seems to me that a necessary part of the evolution of rational people away from the need for personalized deities, is to get away from the need for the "comfort" of being watched over. Individuals who are rational self-aware autonomous moral actors have no need of being watched over by anything other than our own consciences. -G. ===== On 13-03-05-Tue 2:43 PM, Matthew D. Howell wrote: (Comment was sent to me in private email, not to the list, so if Matthew wishes he can repost it to the list.) ===== On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Anon195714 <anon195714(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> Re. Anthony, Rachel, Matthew, re "masking audio." >> >> That was the first thing I tried when I found out about NSA's voice >> recognition back in 1980 (if I recall correctly it was the October 1980 >> issue of _The Progressive_ that referred to the HARVEST program, keyword >> rec and voice rec, and some stuff in a British paper or magazine also, I >> may still have copies around). >> >> The idea was that instead of using a voice scrambler or crypto (which >> required a device at each end of a conversation), voice rec could be >> defeated from one end of a phone call by saturating the channel with >> just enough noise. What killed that idea was the fact that long >> distance telephony used T-carrier that split up the conversation into >> two different speech paths between telco central offices (e.g. me to >> you, you to me). So a device would still be needed at both ends, and >> one may as well just use a scrambler. That led me down the trail to >> details about scramblers (bottom line, analog scramblers aren't any >> good) and ultimately to cryptography by 1982 - 1983. >> >> Re. "every person's voice has a distinct signature that can be >> recognized...", yes, thus voiceprint recognition, which was 99.6% >> accurate in 1960 according to an article in _Telephony_ magazine at the >> time (I may still have that around also). Fast-forward to today at the >> speed of Moore's law, and you can be quite sure that voiceprint >> recognition is used for tracking. >> >> This is one of the things I find most pernicious about the decline in >> the use of landlines and the rise in the number of people with "mobile >> only": A landline enables you to design, build, connect, and use any >> hardware you choose, including digital voice crypto devices, and >> including computers running digital voice crypto. And with a landline >> phone, when the receiver is on the hook, the microphone is physically >> disconnected by the hookswitch, a visible set of switch contacts inside >> the phone. >> >> Mobile devices are sealed black boxes, the ultimate revenge against >> phone phreaks & phone hackers, where you have no final control over >> what's in the black box. Just like the bad old days of Ma Bell when it >> was quasi-illegal to connect "foreign attachments" to your home phone >> line. Even a voice crypto app on a mobile device is questionable at >> best, because you have no way of knowing if at some level it's being >> undermined by something else in the device that you can't detect. By >> analogy, crypto on your laptop, but a keystroke logger hiding between >> you and the crypto app. >> >> The mere possibility of being able to hack the hardware provides more >> security than any sealed box, and best of all is when you can design & >> build your own hardware, such as when people build their own desktop >> machines from components. >> >> Anyway, I agree with Rachel & Matthew that audio masking isn't >> sufficient because it can be undone by the watchers. It may have to do >> in some situations, but it would be better to design more "aggressive" >> personal defense tech such as wearable "resonant audio cannons" or >> something else. >> >> -G. >> >> >> ===== >> >> >> On 13-03-05-Tue 11:21 AM, Matthew D. Howell wrote: >>> @Rachel The state of the technology for recognizing and separating >>> patterns in audio is advanced enough to overcome that sort of thing. >>> Every person's voice has a distinct signature that can be recognized. >>> I would venture a guess that some kind of encrypted digital signal >>> transmission would be the best way to keep any sonic communication >>> private in the most extreme of situations. (most interested party with >>> the best technology at their disposal) >>> – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – >8 >>> /V\ /-\ + + |–| ø \/\/ ∂ £ £ >>> ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– >>> Matthew D. Howell >>> misterinterrupt, tHe M4d swiTcH, the RuinMechanic >>> cell: (617) 755-1481 >>> ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, rachel lyra hospodar >>> <rachelyra(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Wouldn't it need to be non-commercially available music, so they couldn't >>>> just find the audio data of the track, invert its wave, and cancel it out of >>>> the recording? >>>> >>>> CACOPHONY FOR THE REVOLUTION! >>>> >>>> mediumreality.com >>>> >>>> On Mar 5, 2013 10:23 AM, "Steve Berl" <steveberl(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> You could carry a boombox around playing loud music where ever you go. >>>>> Perhaps this would be the end of earbuds. :-) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco(a)gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> People have rendered surveillance cameras useless with very bright IR >>>>>> LEDs in their fields of view. >>>>>> Could something similar be done for sound recording devices? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 5, 2013 6:17 AM, "Anon195714" <anon195714(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>>> Yo's- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Something I forgot to add re. DARPA's desire for universal recording of >>>>>>> face-to-face conversations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's the ideal device for doing all that recording? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How'bout something you wear? How'bout something that "everyone" wears?, >>>>>>> or even a significant fraction of "everyone"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Like maybe Google Glasses. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Always on, camera and mic always "connected" to "the cloud." Orwell's >>>>>>> telescreen gone mobile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Everyone who wears them will become, in effect, _unpaid surveillance >>>>>>> drones_ watching their family and friends, not from up in the sky, but >>>>>>> from up close where every word can be heard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some will say "oh, there's no stopping technology." People said that >>>>>>> about the atomic bomb and the hydrogen bomb. But public outcry led >>>>>>> first to treaties and then to progressive degrees of nuclear >>>>>>> disarmament. We haven't used that technology since it was first used in >>>>>>> WW2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We can stop pernicious tech if we choose. We can refuse, we can >>>>>>> withdraw consent, we do not have to press the Buy button. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Technology should liberate and empower people. "Conveniences with a few >>>>>>> strings attached" are not liberation, they're puppet-strings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's all about control: technology that you can control, vs. technology >>>>>>> that can control you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -G. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ===== >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13-03-05-Tue 1:50 AM, Anon195714 wrote: >>>>>>>> Yo's- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This just in: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "DARPA wants to make [voice recognition/transcription] systems so >>>>>>>> accurate, you’ll be able to easily record, transcribe and recall all >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> conversations you ever have. ... Imagine living in a world where every >>>>>>>> errant utterance you make is preserved forever. ... DARPA [awarded >>>>>>>> U.Texas comp sci researcher Matt Lease]... $300,000... over two years >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> study the new project, called “Blending Crowdsourcing with Automation >>>>>>>> for Fast, Cheap, and Accurate Analysis of Spontaneous Speech.”" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "The idea is that business meetings or even conversations with your >>>>>>>> friends and family could be stored in archives and easily searched. >>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>> stored recordings could be held in servers, owned either by >>>>>>>> individuals >>>>>>>> or their employers. ... The answer, Lease says, is in widespread use >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> recording technologies like smartphones, cameras and audio >>>>>>>> recorders... >>>>>>>> [A] memorandum from the Congressional Research Service described [an >>>>>>>> earlier DARPA project of this type known as] EARS, as focusing on >>>>>>>> speech >>>>>>>> picked up from broadcasts and telephone conversations, “as well as >>>>>>>> extract clues about the identity of speakers” for “the military, >>>>>>>> intelligence and law enforcement communities.”" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/03/darpa-speech/ (Yes, "real >>>>>>>> geeks >>>>>>>> don't read Wired," but nonetheless its news pages are useful for >>>>>>>> keeping >>>>>>>> a finger on the pulse of Big Brother and his corporate Brethren.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In short: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> DARPA is researching the means by which every conversation you have, >>>>>>>> in-person, whether at work or with family or friends, gets picked up >>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>> the mic in your smartphone or other portable device, and stored on a >>>>>>>> server, where DARPA's algorithms and human editors turn all of it into >>>>>>>> fast-searchable text, that could be used by your employer, the >>>>>>>> military, >>>>>>>> law enforcement, and intel agencies. Presumably the credit bureaus, >>>>>>>> insurance companies, and financial institutions will want "in" on the >>>>>>>> data as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now connect that with this, about cell-site tracking and call detail >>>>>>>> records: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "The government maintained [that] Americans have no expectation of >>>>>>>> privacy of such cell-site records [call detail records or CDR] because >>>>>>>> they are in the possession of a third party — the mobile phone >>>>>>>> companies." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/gps-drug-dealer-retrial/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The key point is that the gov's current position is that data stored >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> a third party's servers have "no expectation of privacy." What begins >>>>>>>> with CDR will eventually include voicemail messages stored on the >>>>>>>> mobile >>>>>>>> phone companies' servers, and then eventually all of your live >>>>>>>> in-person >>>>>>>> conversations that are stored "in the cloud." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Anything you say can and will be used against you..." Mark my words. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile people keep using gmail and Google Voice, and smartphones >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> which they can't remove the batteries. Because nothing is more >>>>>>>> important >>>>>>>> than "convenience," right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As a character in a sci-fi piece I wrote in the mid-1980s said, "Why >>>>>>>> put >>>>>>>> a person in prison, when you can put prison in the person instead?" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -G. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>>>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>>>>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>>>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -steve >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss

12 years, 6 months

Bay Lights - World's Largest LED sculpture debuts tonight 9pm

by Raymond Lai

Hey Sudoers, Just wanted to let everyone know that artist Leo Villareal<http://www.villareal.net/>'s new project The Bay Lights <http://thebaylights.org/> will debut tonight at 9pm with a live webcast starting at 8:30. 'The Bay Lights' is turning the Bay Bridge into massive art. 25,000 LEDs, 1.8 miles wide and 500' high. Villareal's is also the artist behind 'Multiverse<http://www.nga.gov/exhibitions/villarealinfo.shtm>' which utilizes 41,000 LEDs and is shown at the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. Cheers, Ray - the Emperor of Ice Cream

12 years, 6 months

Skymall Workshop / Skillshare: Basic Concrete Slab *Sat March 16*, 10am onward

by Vicky Knox

Hey all! My friend Bobby will be putting on the below workshop. He is an amazing builder and metalworker who I've been sneakily trying to suck into the vortex that is Sudo Room. If anyone is interested in going to this workshop that he is putting on, will you envangelize him please? This event is sure to be fun--he has a fascinating mind and brews awesome beer. If you're into beer, make sure to ask him to show you the huge vats he welded, as well as the taps he has set up. V From: Robert Tomkiewicz <tomkiewicz.b(a)gmail.com> Subject: Skymall Workshop / Skillshare: Basic Concrete Slab *Sat March 16*, 10am onward Hi all, I am in the process of modernizing the laundry facilites at the old homestead and the first step is pouring a little slab outdoors to hold the washer and dryer off the ground and function as a foundation for the shed which will hold them. Together, we'll (re)discover the basics of pouring a concrete slab. We'll be mixing by hand in wheelbarrows, which is just fine for a slab of this scale, unless I get a line on a mixer before the end of the week. I will have the forms built and (probably) the rebar laid before Saturday, but they'll be there for you to take a look at so you can see how they're constructed before we begin. Beer and snackage provided. Space is limited to the amount of people that will actually be useful, which in fact is quite a few. Still, if you could RSVP with any specific dietary preferences that would be super sweet. If we're super fast we might even get to do some plumbing. Got to get that natural gas hookup to the dryer, and hot water pipe in place for the washing machine. Bobby

12 years, 6 months

Re: [sudo-discuss] Dystopia Watch: Surveillance drones coming to a cafe near you.

by rachel lyra hospodar

(Private response from dan included below) I am not suggesting here that the goal is to neutralize the voice, but to obfuscate its meaning, to nearby microphones. If there are many sounds fitting the pattern of the user's voice, then perhaps the technology mr. Howell mentions would have a harder time 'hearing' the conversation's actual content in a useful way? Our brains are excellent at pattern recognition & targeted focus, and I guess I am positing here that the gap between their ability to do this, and the software's, is big enough to use. I'm less concerned about establishing completely secure encrypted special-use channels (eg redphone), but more am idly thinking about ways to increase security for day-to-day interactions (redCafe???) ...like doing harm reduction. My experience with activism in our modern surveillance state is that, while a small group can be trained to be truly information secure, this is only really possible for specific highly covert projects, and it generates behavior anomalous enough to be its own red flag. Generally speaking you have to interact with people in their terms, in public or 'normal' ways, to reach them. The conversations I expect people will be crucified for are not the truly secret ones. Running a device like this in cafes would be a hilarious way to do outreach about Big Brother. Many people have no idea of the extent of what is already possible. R. On Mar 5, 2013 11:47 AM, "Daniel Finlay" <namelessdan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > To truly neutralize a sound the inverted copy of the sound needs to be perfectly lined up with the original sound in relation to the target microphone. (It's impractical for general use. Besides, if it worked the way you're imagining, we wouldn't be able to hear each other) > > > On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:34 AM, rachel lyra hospodar <rachelyra(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> What if everyone carried a device that captured what they were saying and replayed it, layered along with other recordings of their own voice? >> >> Or we could hold all of our meetings without devices, in the fields and mountains, with birdsong our walls and the sky as our roof. >> >> On Mar 5, 2013 11:22 AM, "Matthew D. Howell" <matthewdhowell(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> @Rachel The state of the technology for recognizing and separating >>> patterns in audio is advanced enough to overcome that sort of thing. >>> Every person's voice has a distinct signature that can be recognized. >>> I would venture a guess that some kind of encrypted digital signal >>> transmission would be the best way to keep any sonic communication >>> private in the most extreme of situations. (most interested party with >>> the best technology at their disposal) >>> – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – >8 >>> /V\ /-\ + + |–| ø \/\/ ∂ £ £ >>> ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– >>> Matthew D. Howell >>> misterinterrupt, tHe M4d swiTcH, the RuinMechanic >>> cell: (617) 755-1481 >>> ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, rachel lyra hospodar >>> <rachelyra(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Wouldn't it need to be non-commercially available music, so they couldn't >>> > just find the audio data of the track, invert its wave, and cancel it out of >>> > the recording? >>> > >>> > CACOPHONY FOR THE REVOLUTION! >>> > >>> > mediumreality.com >>> > >>> > On Mar 5, 2013 10:23 AM, "Steve Berl" <steveberl(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> You could carry a boombox around playing loud music where ever you go. >>> >> Perhaps this would be the end of earbuds. :-) >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Di Franco < di.franco(a)gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> People have rendered surveillance cameras useless with very bright IR >>> >>> LEDs in their fields of view. >>> >>> Could something similar be done for sound recording devices? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2013 6:17 AM, "Anon195714" <anon195714(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Yo's- >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Something I forgot to add re. DARPA's desire for universal recording of >>> >>>> face-to-face conversations. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> What's the ideal device for doing all that recording? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> How'bout something you wear? How'bout something that "everyone" wears?, >>> >>>> or even a significant fraction of "everyone"? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Like maybe Google Glasses. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Always on, camera and mic always "connected" to "the cloud." Orwell's >>> >>>> telescreen gone mobile. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Everyone who wears them will become, in effect, _unpaid surveillance >>> >>>> drones_ watching their family and friends, not from up in the sky, but >>> >>>> from up close where every word can be heard. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Some will say "oh, there's no stopping technology." People said that >>> >>>> about the atomic bomb and the hydrogen bomb. But public outcry led >>> >>>> first to treaties and then to progressive degrees of nuclear >>> >>>> disarmament. We haven't used that technology since it was first used in >>> >>>> WW2. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> We can stop pernicious tech if we choose. We can refuse, we can >>> >>>> withdraw consent, we do not have to press the Buy button. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Technology should liberate and empower people. "Conveniences with a few >>> >>>> strings attached" are not liberation, they're puppet-strings. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> It's all about control: technology that you can control, vs. technology >>> >>>> that can control you. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -G. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> ===== >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On 13-03-05-Tue 1:50 AM, Anon195714 wrote: >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > Yo's- >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > This just in: >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > "DARPA wants to make [voice recognition/transcription] systems so >>> >>>> > accurate, you’ll be able to easily record, transcribe and recall all >>> >>>> > the >>> >>>> > conversations you ever have. ... Imagine living in a world where every >>> >>>> > errant utterance you make is preserved forever. ... DARPA [awarded >>> >>>> > U.Texas comp sci researcher Matt Lease]... $300,000... over two years >>> >>>> > to >>> >>>> > study the new project, called “Blending Crowdsourcing with Automation >>> >>>> > for Fast, Cheap, and Accurate Analysis of Spontaneous Speech.”" >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > "The idea is that business meetings or even conversations with your >>> >>>> > friends and family could be stored in archives and easily searched. >>> >>>> > The >>> >>>> > stored recordings could be held in servers, owned either by >>> >>>> > individuals >>> >>>> > or their employers. ... The answer, Lease says, is in widespread use >>> >>>> > of >>> >>>> > recording technologies like smartphones, cameras and audio >>> >>>> > recorders... >>> >>>> > [A] memorandum from the Congressional Research Service described [an >>> >>>> > earlier DARPA project of this type known as] EARS, as focusing on >>> >>>> > speech >>> >>>> > picked up from broadcasts and telephone conversations, “as well as >>> >>>> > extract clues about the identity of speakers” for “the military, >>> >>>> > intelligence and law enforcement communities.”" >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/03/darpa-speech/ (Yes, "real >>> >>>> > geeks >>> >>>> > don't read Wired," but nonetheless its news pages are useful for >>> >>>> > keeping >>> >>>> > a finger on the pulse of Big Brother and his corporate Brethren.) >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > In short: >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > DARPA is researching the means by which every conversation you have, >>> >>>> > in-person, whether at work or with family or friends, gets picked up >>> >>>> > by >>> >>>> > the mic in your smartphone or other portable device, and stored on a >>> >>>> > server, where DARPA's algorithms and human editors turn all of it into >>> >>>> > fast-searchable text, that could be used by your employer, the >>> >>>> > military, >>> >>>> > law enforcement, and intel agencies. Presumably the credit bureaus, >>> >>>> > insurance companies, and financial institutions will want "in" on the >>> >>>> > data as well. >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > Now connect that with this, about cell-site tracking and call detail >>> >>>> > records: >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > "The government maintained [that] Americans have no expectation of >>> >>>> > privacy of such cell-site records [call detail records or CDR] because >>> >>>> > they are in the possession of a third party — the mobile phone >>> >>>> > companies." >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/gps-drug-dealer-retrial/ >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > The key point is that the gov's current position is that data stored >>> >>>> > on >>> >>>> > a third party's servers have "no expectation of privacy." What begins >>> >>>> > with CDR will eventually include voicemail messages stored on the >>> >>>> > mobile >>> >>>> > phone companies' servers, and then eventually all of your live >>> >>>> > in-person >>> >>>> > conversations that are stored "in the cloud." >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > "Anything you say can and will be used against you..." Mark my words. >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > Meanwhile people keep using gmail and Google Voice, and smartphones >>> >>>> > from >>> >>>> > which they can't remove the batteries. Because nothing is more >>> >>>> > important >>> >>>> > than "convenience," right? >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > As a character in a sci-fi piece I wrote in the mid-1980s said, "Why >>> >>>> > put >>> >>>> > a person in prison, when you can put prison in the person instead?" >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > -G. >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> > sudo-discuss mailing list >>> >>>> > sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>> >>>> > http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>> >>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>> >>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>> >>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>> >>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> -steve >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> sudo-discuss mailing list >>> >> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>> >> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>> >> >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > sudo-discuss mailing list >>> > sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>> > http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sudo-discuss mailing list >> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss > >

12 years, 6 months

sudoroom door! help!

by hol＠gaskill.com

Can someone please PM me the link to open the sudoroom door? i'm inside the building, just need to get inside the room. Thanks! Hol (resending under correct subject line) _______________________________________________ sudo-discuss mailing list sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss

12 years, 6 months

Microcontroller hacking tomorrow night?

by hol＠gaskill.com

Anybody want to do some microcontroller tinkering tomorrow night? Would like to figure out how to interface arduinoRPi. Also going to continue work on using Processing http://processing.org/exhibition/ to communicate with microcontrollers. Lots of power when you combine a few of these basic tools... Cheers, Hol

12 years, 6 months

there's a membership page on sudoroom.org

by Tommy York

We just collaboratively designed it in Sudoroom (w00t kopimism), much thanks to Matt for designing the Google doc form. Comments appreciated. ----------------- Thomas Riley York (杨德民) 510.926.0510 http://www.linkedin.com/in/tommyyork

12 years, 6 months

Re: [sudo-discuss] sudo-discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 4

by Cyrus Farivar

FWIW, here's the LA Times: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lockpick-20130302,0,454000.story -C -- Cyrus Farivar "suh-ROOS FAR-ih-var" Journalist and radio producer | cyrusfarivar.com (http://cyrusfarivar.com) Author, "The Internet of Elsewhere" | internetofelsewhere.com (http://internetofelsewhere.com) US: +1 510 394 5485 (m) | Twitter/Skype: cfarivar "Being a good writer is 3% talent, 97% not being distracted by the Internet." cfarivar(a)cfarivar.org (mailto:cfarivar@cfarivar.org) On Saturday, March 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, sudo-discuss-request(a)lists.sudoroom.org wrote: > Send sudo-discuss mailing list submissions to > sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org (mailto:sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org) > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sudo-discuss-request(a)lists.sudoroom.org (mailto:sudo-discuss-request@lists.sudoroom.org) > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sudo-discuss-owner(a)lists.sudoroom.org (mailto:sudo-discuss-owner@lists.sudoroom.org) > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sudo-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: It's Unconscionable (Anca Mosoiu) > 2. Re: It's Unconscionable (rusty lindgren) > 3. thunderbolt video cards (rusty lindgren) > 4. Re: Friday Filosophy: Software as Speech (Steve Berl) > 5. Re: Friday Filosophy: Software as Speech (Eddan) > 6. Yelp Locksmiths Greatest Hits Vol. 1 (rusty lindgren) > 7. Re: It's Unconscionable (Daniel Finlay) > 8. Re: Yelp Locksmiths Greatest Hits Vol. 1 (Andrew) > 9. Re: It's Unconscionable (Eddan) > 10. Re: It's Unconscionable (rusty lindgren) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 23:27:54 -0800 > From: Anca Mosoiu <anca(a)techliminal.com (mailto:anca@techliminal.com)> > To: Michael Scroggins <michaeljscroggins(a)gmail.com (mailto:michaeljscroggins@gmail.com)> > Cc: sudo-discuss <sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org (mailto:sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org)>, eddan(a)eddan.com (mailto:eddan@eddan.com) > Subject: Re: [sudo-discuss] It's Unconscionable > Message-ID: > <CALDsrHjzKjQAwAs-X5QMP8e+e0_w+ejxFaZJec_P1tS9a_invQ(a)mail.gmail.com (mailto:CALDsrHjzKjQAwAs-X5QMP8e+e0_w+ejxFaZJec_P1tS9a_invQ@mail.gmail.com)> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Michael Scroggins < > michaeljscroggins(a)gmail.com (mailto:michaeljscroggins@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > The sentence implicitly draws a difference of kind between the lock > > picking class and the other Workshop Weekend classes. Doing so invites the > > question: What is the difference that makes broadcasting this workshop (in > > the way it was) regrettable? In an environment where the mayor, the chief > > of police and the media have all given the same answer - the class breeds > > criminals - allowing that question is regrettable. > > > > > It's regrettable because it gave some easy pickings for the people who want > to portray Oakland, and the current administration, in a certain way. Many > of the people who are upset about the workshop aren't upset about > lockpicking, they're upset that Jean Quan appears to encourage crime in her > newsletter. > > It's regrettable because it sucked up airwaves and mental effort that might > have been better spent. > > Drafting a reasoned and reasonable response lowers the blood pressure of > the people who are up in arms just because they aren't informed. Some of > them will come around, especially if they understand the actual intent of > the class. > > Eddan, I'd like to participate in writing a statement. I was really taken > aback when I read some of the emails and talked to some of the people who > were actually upset. > > The media storm will blow over with the next foot-in-mouth opportunity from > a local politician, but we have a great opportunity to reach out while the > world is looking. > > Anca. > > > -- > -=-=-=- > Anca Mosoiu | Tech Liminal > anca(a)techliminal.com (mailto:anca@techliminal.com) > M: (510) 220-6660 > http://techliminal.com | T: @techliminal | F: facebook.com/techliminal (http://facebook.com/techliminal) >

12 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

sudo-discuss