27 Oct
2013
27 Oct
'13
1:55 p.m.
I don't think that coming to evening meetings and weekend events should be the
ultimate metric of commitment to Sudo Room.
Not everyone can make it at those times because of work and family obligations.
On Oct 27, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Jenny Ryan <tunabananas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sudo Room should not sacrifice its foundational values
so as to be taken seriously by traditional power structures. This is part and parcel of
being a vessel of social change. Noisebridge has an ad hoc and ever-changing do-ocracy of
leaders, as does Sudo. The inscription of a Board merely makes static what is in actuality
a dynamic aspect of the community, hence its role (in the vein of honesty and radical
transparency) is as merely an on-paper minimum satisfactory requirement for bureaucratic
processes. Come to any meeting of Noisebridge or Sudo and it will be readily apparent
who's currently taking on leadership roles.