My suggestion goes like this...
INTERNET --> SudoRoom Intranet --> RasPi ---> Door [the ONLY thing the
RasPi does is open the door via an http call to an API]
USB -> Door Function Computer/Computers (RFID, BUZZER, KEYPAD) --> SudoRoom
-> RasPi (Via HTTP) -> Door
So all the RasPi does is open the door. All other functions can be off
loaded to other computers RasPi's or not, they just need to have usb ports
and be connected to a hub that gets them on the SudoRoom Intranet. Then all
they have to do is hit the opendoor API on the DoorPi.
Make sense?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:28 PM, J.C. <r33lmm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Would it make sense to hook up two pi's
redundantly, have one as the
primary for the keypad, and one as the primary for the rfid, and config
them to be interchangeable, so if one goes down or is being hacked on, the
door is still fully functional.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, William Budington <bill(a)inputoutput.io>wrote;wrote:
Another one of the problems is that on Saturday
there was a camera
installed, connected to the RasPi, which brings it up to three things
connected to one RasPi - the keypad, the camera, and the RFID reader.
Our RasPi model has only 2 USB ports, so - we need either a USB Hub
(which may or may not work) or another RasPi right at the door (which
would necessitate an additional network hub), which adds the amount of
stealable equipment at the point of entry.
We may want to put a locked box to protect that equipment instead of the
cardboard box we have currently. Even if it's a really simple locked
box, it still looks less stealable than all the equipment in a cardboard
box like we currently have.
Bill
On 06/09/2013 07:01 PM, Marc Juul wrote:
We could try putting a powered usb hub in between
the pi and the
keypad. That may stop the crashing.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Romy Ilano <romy(a)snowyla.com>
wrote:
Despite all the stress I think it's cool we
are talking more to
hair kandi. They are cool and this collaboration makes me happy
---
Romy Ilano Founder of Snowyla
http://www.snowyla.com
romy(a)snowyla.com
On Jun 9, 2013, at 18:31, rusty lindgren
<rustylindgren(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, if he didn't demand that we fix it, he demanded that we
> lock the
door at all times, which requires us keeping that thing working
or having some other support system. The fact that he did what
he did yesterday, is even more deplorable, because we are not
equipped to support the door at all times.
>
> Basically, I 100% agree that George needs to take care of
> that, and
that we should tell hair kandi the same story. I wouldn't mind
talking to them, but this week is probably the worst time,
because I have a lot of work due and I leave for vacation on
thursday.
>
> Anyone game?
>
> -Rusty
>
>
> _______________________________________________ sudo-discuss
> mailing list sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________ sudo-discuss
mailing list sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________ sudo-discuss
mailing list sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
--
ThanX,
;+)
https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Fort
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss