I agree the allocated layout with plugs is adequate both per code (max 13
outlets - industry practice 10/breaker) and for our loads. I'm just waiting
for the nod to start the work. There is plenty of volume in the 3/4"
conduit for future alterations. Naturally, I would like to get the
reimbursement check ASAP. The hurtle I have heard include signing off by
L.Lord to begin. I have some time this week and would like to begin
installation.
-Whit
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:15 AM, J Clark <hello(a)sl-co.com> wrote:
On 9/7/14 10:12 AM, hol(a)gaskill.com wrote:
we've been thinking the desk/laptop load would be split between two big
power strips with one attached to the back wall and one running from 3d
printing area, so on 2x20A runs. so far we haven't tripped a breaker that
i know of (have we?) and that's with the existing tentacle-suspension
bridge infrastructure. from what i understand, there were already $400
dollars allocated for 'phase i' which has been circulating for a few weeks
now, and whit already paid out of pocket for the materials to match the
budget, and as far as i know has not been reimbursed :(. with the servers
getting their own dedicated runs, the risks associated with a breaker
popping in the event of an extreme load are pretty low. my inclination
would be that unless someone shows quantitative analysis of planned loads
exceeding planned capacity (thank you judy for crunching some loads!) then
we can move forward with the plan that's been refined over the last month.
I do not know about any limitations like de-rating breaker positions below
their rated capacity so there could be something we're missing.
cheers
On 2014-09-07 08:54, J Clark wrote to hol:
Hol,
Just curious. If you have, say, 25 Sudoers each with a laptop/3d
printer/other power thing plugged in at the same time to, say, a several
extension cord plugs -- guessing average 75 watts each? (between Apple's
60W and 80W, guessing more would be the older), that's 1875 Watts at once,
at 110 V that's 17 amps. (I think that's right.) This is reasonable for a
20A circuit? (Seems so, just curious to know if there are other bits to
consider.)
Thanks
judi
On Sep 7, 2014, at 8:27 AM, hol(a)gaskill.com wrote:
i do think since CCL will be pulling from a different panel that we should
have enough amps from 4x20 amp breaker positions. the balcony is set to
get its own 2 runs (with one 20A plug on each run) for the server farm and
any amplifiers set to run there, the 3d printing area and museum have a
breaker run, and the tool area will have its own breaker. the only
complication in my mind is the back set of outlets sharing a breaker with
the tools and someone bearing down with a chop saw just before someone hits
save on the new greatest cryptographic algorithm on their laptop. that's
what pushes it to 5 positions in my mind if it were easy to get that 5th
run energized.
we do intend to run a separate 230V service later for the heavy stuff over
2 outlets, so maybe we could identify a spot for a breaker to be installed
under stage 2.
cheers
On 2014-09-07 07:04, Dave Pedroli wrote:
Fine by me. Just my opinion that loads add up. Indeed we use more things with small
loads than ever before... I have worked on houses that get by on two fifteen amp circuits
in San Francisco and I have had problems with two hundred amps 220 volts not being
enough...
Dave
Sent from the surveillance van
On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org> wrote: I disagree. We
have very few things that use more than 100 watts, and the number is
diminishing constantly. a laptop takes no more than 100 watts max,
typically around 50. 60 watt lightbulbs are occasionally used, but more
often we use 24 watt CFLs, when we're not simply using the overhead lights.
Desktop computers with their monitors take a total of less than 200. 3d
printers take between 50 and 100 watts depending on how much heating is
needed. A heat gun can take 1500 watts, but a 20-amp breaker can supply
over 2400 watts. Without a more detailed list of what people expect to plug
in, we can't be sure one way or another whether there will be conflicts
requiring something to be plugged into a different outlet. But my
experience tells me that what we have sketched out so far is more than
enough. and we know for a fact that increasing service will correspondingly
increase costs and time to completion, and complexity if we run out of
circuit breakers overestimating our needs. Worst case is that you have to
plug the second autoclave into a different outlet than the first one. -jake
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014, Dave Pedroli wrote: Hi all, Going over your emails and
PDFs it looks good however putting more than a couple outlets on a breaker
will end up being problematic. Yes refrigerators are smaller loads but
there will be a time when someone opens all one after the other and they
try to start all at once blowing a breaker and defrosting... Autoclaves
typically need their own circuit etc ... 13 outlets with 4 breakers is
pushing it. If the majority of use was to be laptops and soldering irons ok
but the minute a heat gun is plugged in poof, you blow a breaker. With
electricity and parachutes it's best to start out right rather than build
up to it. I'll go over the PDFs on my iPad later and let you know what I
think. The layout looks fine, the number of outlets looks good it's just
the the number of circuits (breakets) that needs improving. Dave Somewhere
on the bonneville salt flats Sent from the surveillance van
On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org> wrote: I believe the
electrical panel in the balcony only supplies one or two things (not
including the robot, which is a temporary connection) I think we should
look into simply moving that breaker box down ten feet so it faces the
server room, and be done with it.
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Whitney Lawrence wrote: Howdy,Let me begin with
thanking you for looking at the proposal. Your interpretation of the plans
is correct.{ Main -> above stage panel -> balcony panel } is how the
proposed plan is drawn. There is enough room in the balcony panel (which is
the one located in the small room that shares a wall with the server loft
of sudoroom) to accomplish phase 1 of the proposal. The proposal is based
on instruction received to minimize cost. Ideally, there would be a main
panel breaker that supplies a sub panel for all of sudo's needs (phase 1
and phase 2). I can't accurately guess at a cost number for this type of
installation. Figure a 100amp sub with hundreds of feet of 2awg plus
breaker box plus breakers plus conduit plus hardware. All depending on if
the main service can even handle the additional power demands (hiring an
electrician to run the calcs). Ballpark $3-5k maybe- but its really a shot
in the dark? My experience with this type of thing is there is always a
better way to do it, if you go the money. A middle road is to plan on
having the future sudo-sub panel placed near the balcony panel. Build in an
extra 5ft or so of wire for the future transition into the new sudo-sub
panel. All that would be needed is to remove the breakers from the old box
re-run wire from J-box 1 to the new sudo-sub, as well as re-routing the
240V lines from the above stage panel to the sudo-sub (and of course
preform all the main -> suod-sub work). as far as existing vs proposed.
only the sub panels mentioned above exist currently- I'll make a note to
call out the existing stuff in the drawings. Thanks, Whit On Fri, Sep 5,
2014 at 11:42 AM, Cere Mona Davis <ceremona(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi
everyone. It's the first time I have looked at these plans and I have some
questions and thoughts. Dave said he won't be able to respond to this email
until a couple of days as he is out in the boonies somewhere. So I am
writing in to expedite some issues that I think he will likely bring up in
the days ahead. Whit, thanks for drawing up these plans! For someone who is
not intimately familiar with our electrical layout the plans might need a
more clear description of existing electrical vs. proposed new electrical,
however. In multiple conversations with Dave (and one on-site visit) he has
mentioned repeatedly that we will want to shoot for putting in another sub
panel for the sudoroom off of the main panel as the end-game; rather than
daisy-chaining off of an existing panel (the balcony) as what seems to be
proposed here. If we can't immediately put in a sub panel into the room,
due to cost, we should at-least be planning for conduit and wiring paths,
etc that allows for a sudoroom sub-panel in the future. Thoughts? -Cere On
Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:23 AM, <hol(a)gaskill.com> wrote: Thanks Yar! Whit
can you liaise w/ Dave RE how much of the work is going to be done under
the first permit? Cheers, Hol On 2014-09-04 23:16, yar wrote: Hi all, Dave
Pedroli is a certified electrician who's offered to review our plans to
give them an okay. I'm copying him and the people who've been most involved
with electrical work. Dave, the latest plans are attached, and also
available online[1
<https://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/2014-August/007369.html>].
Could you please look them over and write us a few formal-sounding
sentences that boil down to "hello I am a real electrician and I say these
plans are solid"? This will help us make the landlord happy so he will let
us do them. Thank you!! [1]
https://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/2014-August/007369.html
-- Best Regards, Cere Davis ceremona(a)gmail.com ------------------- GPG
Key:
http://taffy.findpage.com/~cere/pubkey.asc GPG fingerprint (ID#
73FCA9E6) : F5C7 627B ECBE C735 117B 2278 9A95 4C88 73FC A9E6
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing
listsudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.orghttps://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
--
*San Leandro Coworking*
400 Estudillo Ave., #204
San Leandro, CA 94577
+1-510-398-4000
http://sl-co.com