26 Apr
2013
26 Apr
'13
7:18 p.m.
you're not a court, it doesnt set any precedent. If you do it this
time, and decide you dont like it, you can not do it later.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Andrew <andrew(a)roshambomedia.com> wrote:
Another reason to have a suggested donation is if you
are using a venue that
doesn't allow a cover. I'll swing either way depending on the opinions of
other members, but I would like to point out that this would set a precedent
that non-free events are ok at Sudo Room as long as there is a door split.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Sonja Trauss <sonja.trauss(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Mark that is a great explanation!
Now that I think about it - I encountered that once when people were
selling-but-not-selling alcohol.
My vote does not matter at all, but I vote to just let them charge
admission, let them give you half. Things cost money, I don't think
there is anything wrong with openly acknowledging it and being
practical about it.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:47 PM, mark burdett <mfburdett(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
-------
Andrew Lowe
Cell: 831-332-2507
http://roshambomedia.com
Aside from the
no-one-turned-away-for-lack-of-funds thing so broke
people
can attend, events often have a suggested donation because a film,
recording, piece of music, etc. may be licensed for non-commercial use
only.
That means they would not permit the movie to be screened when an
admission
fee is charged. But you could suggest donations (another alternative
would
be sell food/snacks/etc.)
--mark B.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss