Totally right. Sorry if my mail was a bit unclear, but I'm vehemently opposed
to making this the subject of a meeting.
On Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:04:51 AM hol(a)gaskill.com wrote:
It was already blocked by several people due to some
concerns - among
them is that he didn't mention the situation RE Noisebridge at all until
prompted, which didn't convey a sense of openness and honesty. I
believe someone is reaching out to him to get more info on the situation
so probably best not to make it the subject of a meeting until there's
been a chance to hear everyone out offline. I left at 10:30 so may have
missed who that was - if it wasn't delegated to anyone I'll contact him.
cheers
On 2015-01-08 10:02, Torrie Fischer wrote:
> Hei, sudo room.
>
> I want to avoid as much conflict as possible here on discuss@ so I'll
> state up
> front that I would really rather folks talk to me in person or off list
> in
> response to this.
>
> I had every intention of coming to Sudo last night as I infrequently do
> to see
> whats up and hack on things and spend more time in the space. My knee
> disagreed to I went home instead.
>
> Had I made it I would've certainly blocked RAYC's membership.
>
> I plan on showing up at Sudo Room next week to have a legitimate block
> in
> person since phoning it in as I'm doing in this e-mail is bullshit and
> we all
> know that. I would appreciate it a bunch if others were around to hear
> me
> elaborate about my principled objection and give feedback if it has any
> standing. I also don't think its all that excellent of an idea to try
> and
> discuss this on a wednesday night when folks want to just get together
> and be
> positive, so I'll certainly be making more of an effort to be at the
> space
> before then for discussion.
>
> Again, I'm not going to respond to this on the list but feel free to
> poke me
> off-list or AFK :)
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss