Fuck.... seriously?
On 3/2/14, Rudy Arredondo <hola_5(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Planned food safety rules rile organic farmersLocal
growers are discovering
that proposed FDA regulations would
curtail many common techniques, such as using house-made fertilizers and
irrigating from creeks.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-food-safety-20140223,0,6831660.story#ix…
HUSTONTOWN, Pa. -- Jim
Crawford was rushing to load crates of freshly picked organic tomatoes
onto trucks heading for an urban farmers market when he noticed the
federal agent.
A tense conversation followed as
the visitor to his farm -- an inspector from the Food and Drug
Administration -- warned him that some organic-growing techniques he had
honed over four decades could soon be outlawed.
"This is my badge. These are the fines. This is what is hanging over
your head, and we want you to know that," Crawford says the official
told him.
Crawford's popular farm may
seem a curious place for the FDA to move ahead with a long-planned
federal assault on deadly food poisoning. To Crawford's knowledge, none
of the kohlrabi, fennel, sugar snap peas or other crops from his New Morning
Farm have ever sickened anyone. But he is not the only organic grower to
suddenly discover federal inspectors on his land.
In 2010, after a years-long campaign, food-safety activists persuaded
Congress to give the FDA authority to regulate farm practices.
The next year, an outbreak of food poisoning that killed 33 people who
ate tainted cantaloupes put pressure on the FDA to be aggressive.
Now, farmers are discovering that the FDA's proposed rules would
curtail many techniques that are common among organic growers, including
spreading house-made fertilizers, tilling cropland with grazing
animals, and irrigating from open creeks.
Suddenly, from small family operations nestled in the foothills of
Appalachia to the sophisticated organic-grower networks that serve Los
Angeles and San Francisco, the farms that celebrity chefs and
food-conscious consumers jostle to buy from are facing an unexpected
adversary.
They're fighting back. Even though full enforcement of the rules is
still years away, they are warning customers that some farms would have
to close.
"They are going to drive farms out of business," said Dave Runsten, policy
director for Community Alliance with Family Farmers in Davis, Calif.
"The consumer groups behind this don't understand farming," Runsten
says. "They talk out of both sides of their mouth. They demand these
one-size-fits-all regulations, then say, 'I don't want to hurt those
cute little farmers at the farmers market. I shop at the farmers
market.' It is frustrating."
Many farmers who take part in the locally grown food movement argue
that contamination is a problem of industrial-sized farms and that some
of the practices the FDA might ban actually make consumers safer.
Food safety advocates have urged regulators to hang tough. "We don't
believe large facilities are the only place where outbreaks are
happening," said Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director at the Center
for Science in the Public Interest in Washington. Farm-to-fork growers, she
said, need to accept that emerging strains of E. coli
and other bacteria can just as easily seep into the produce sold at a
farmers market as into the batches of salad bagged at giant processing
plants, and they need to tweak their methods to protect against it.
"At the end of the day, consumers will be paying a little bit more
for this. But a few cents here may help avoid a severe illness," Smith
DeWaal says.
Congress passed the landmark Food Safety Modernization Act amid
alarming reports from public health agencies about widespread food
contamination. Tens of millions of consumers are sickened by tainted
food each year, and some 3,000 die annually as a result, according to the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Parents of children who died from drinking contaminated juice or
eating unsafe spinach rallied lawmakers with horrifying stories.
Concerns about bioterrorism also played a role. The new rules are meant,
in part, to make the nation's food supply less susceptible to
tampering.
The century-old FDA has ample experience breaking up unsafe
pharmaceutical factories and food processors but is still finding its
way around family farms. At a recent congressional hearing, Rep. Marsha
Blackburn (R-Tenn.) seized on one draft set of rules in which the FDA
declared kale is "never consumed raw."
"I was going to offer to make a kale salad for you," she said to
Michael Taylor, a deputy commissioner. "It causes you to wonder if those
who are writing these rules have ever set foot on a farm."
Over the summer, the owner of the last working farm in Akron, Ohio,
which had been supplying produce to locals for 117 years, said he was
throwing in the towel and blamed the FDA's new rules. Don Bessemer
told the Akron Beacon Journal that he was up for fighting pests and
even drought, but not bureaucrats. Thirty workers lost jobs.
Federal regulators have been scrambling to find the right balance
ever since the draft rules set off controversy. The FDA has backed away
from some of its positions, and Taylor points out that thousands of the
smallest farms would be exempt from new inspections under an agreement
negotiated in Congress.
"This is the first time that the FDA will have regulated produce safety on
the farm," he said in an interview.
"It is understandable people have concerns and questions," he added. "We
have learned a lot during this last year."
Regulators have been poring over comments from some 20,000 groups and
individuals. On listening tours at farms, they have gotten an earful
from growers such as Judith Redmond, one of the owners of the 350-acre Full
Belly Farm
in the scenic Capay Valley northwest of Sacramento. Redmond says she is
bewildered by proposed restrictions on compost that could make it
impossible to use on some crops.
"We think they should be encouraging people to use compost," she
said. "To consider it dangerous or potentially harboring pathogens is
the wrong message to be sending."
While the FDA is striking a conciliatory tone, protest is sure to
follow when revised rules emerge this summer. That much is clear just
from listening to both sides on issues as esoteric as how long farmers
should be required to leave manure in a compost pile.
Farmers say they simply don't have the facilities to do what food-safety
groups are demanding.
Crawford, for example, fertilizes his farm with manure made from the
waste of his 300 chickens. Composting it for as long a period as the
draft FDA rules require would be impossible, he says.
He worries, too, about rules requiring him to keep animals away from the
crops.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest will be pushing the FDA not to
yield.
"Necessity is the mother of invention," Smith DeWaal said. "Why not
create a cooperative whose sole job it is to truck this stuff to a
composting facility and truck it back? It's an expense, but way better
than the unexpected expense of a major recall and implications to your
farm if an outbreak is traced to your product. There are costs either
way."
That might make sense to Crawford, the farmer, if he saw convincing
evidence the manure he is using is dangerous. But he hasn't. What he
sees is an added expense that will give another reason for farmers
operating on the margins to call it quits.
"The public loves to love and idealize us little family farmers," he
said. "But the vast majority of us are hanging by a thread. Now, the
government is saying, 'We are going to put a lot more weight on that
thread.'"
evan.halper(a)latimes.com
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-food-safety-20140223,0,6831660.story#ix…
The National Latino Farmers & Ranchers Trade Association
717 D Street, NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20004
202-628-8833-General
202-628-1440-Direct
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Food Crisis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to food_crisis+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to food_crisis(a)googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/food_crisis.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.