i do think since CCL will be pulling from a different panel that we
should have enough amps from 4x20 amp breaker positions. the balcony
is set to get its own 2 runs (with one 20A plug on each run) for the
server farm and any amplifiers set to run there, the 3d printing area
and museum have a breaker run, and the tool area will have its own
breaker. the only complication in my mind is the back set of outlets
sharing a breaker with the tools and someone bearing down with a chop
saw just before someone hits save on the new greatest cryptographic
algorithm on their laptop. that's what pushes it to 5 positions in my
mind if it were easy to get that 5th run energized.
we do intend to run a separate 230V service later for the heavy stuff
over 2 outlets, so maybe we could identify a spot for a breaker to be
installed under stage 2.
cheers
On 2014-09-07 07:04, Dave Pedroli wrote:
Fine by me. Just my opinion that loads add up.
Indeed we use more things with small loads than ever before... I have worked on houses
that get by on two fifteen amp circuits in San Francisco and I have had problems with two
hundred amps 220 volts not being enough...
Dave
Sent from the surveillance van
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org
> <mailto:jake@spaz.org>> wrote: I disagree. We have very few things
> that use more than 100 watts, and the number is diminishing
> constantly. a laptop takes no more than 100 watts max, typically
> around 50. 60 watt lightbulbs are occasionally used, but more often
> we use 24 watt CFLs, when we're not simply using the overhead
> lights. Desktop computers with their monitors take a total of less
> than 200. 3d printers take between 50 and 100 watts depending on how
> much heating is needed. A heat gun can take 1500 watts, but a 20-amp
> breaker can supply over 2400 watts. Without a more detailed list of
> what people expect to plug in, we can't be sure one way or another
> whether there will be conflicts requiring something to be plugged
> into a different outlet. But my experience tells me that what we
> have sketched out so far is more than enough. and we know for a fact
> that increasing service will correspondingly increase costs and time
> to completion, and complexity if we run out of circuit breakers
> overestimating our needs. Worst case is that you have to plug the
> second autoclave into a different outlet than the first one. -jake
>> On Sat, 6 Sep 2014, Dave Pedroli wrote: Hi all, Going over your
>> emails and PDFs it looks good however putting more than a couple
>> outlets on a breaker will end up being problematic. Yes
>> refrigerators are smaller loads but there will be a time when
>> someone opens all one after the other and they try to start all at
>> once blowing a breaker and defrosting... Autoclaves typically need
>> their own circuit etc ... 13 outlets with 4 breakers is pushing it.
>> If the majority of use was to be laptops and soldering irons ok but
>> the minute a heat gun is plugged in poof, you blow a breaker. With
>> electricity and parachutes it's best to start out right rather than
>> build up to it. I'll go over the PDFs on my iPad later and let you
>> know what I think. The layout looks fine, the number of outlets
>> looks good it's just the the number of circuits (breakets) that
>> needs improving. Dave Somewhere on the bonneville salt flats Sent
>> from the surveillance van
>>> On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org
>>> <mailto:jake@spaz.org>> wrote: I believe the electrical panel in
>>> the balcony only supplies one or two things (not including the
>>> robot, which is a temporary connection) I think we should look
>>> into simply moving that breaker box down ten feet so it faces the
>>> server room, and be done with it.
>>>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Whitney Lawrence wrote: Howdy,Let me begin
>>>> with thanking you for looking at the proposal. Your
>>>> interpretation of the plans is correct.{ Main -> above stage
>>>> panel -> balcony panel } is how the proposed plan is drawn. There
>>>> is enough room in the balcony panel (which is the one located in
>>>> the small room that shares a wall with the server loft of
>>>> sudoroom) to accomplish phase 1 of the proposal. The proposal is
>>>> based on instruction received to minimize cost. Ideally, there
>>>> would be a main panel breaker that supplies a sub panel for all
>>>> of sudo's needs (phase 1 and phase 2). I can't accurately guess
>>>> at a cost number for this type of installation. Figure a 100amp
>>>> sub with hundreds of feet of 2awg plus breaker box plus breakers
>>>> plus conduit plus hardware. All depending on if the main service
>>>> can even handle the additional power demands (hiring an
>>>> electrician to run the calcs). Ballpark $3-5k maybe- but its
>>>> really a shot in the dark? My experience with this type of thing
>>>> is there is always a better way to do it, if you go the money. A
>>>> middle road is to plan on having the future sudo-sub panel placed
>>>> near the balcony panel. Build in an extra 5ft or so of wire for
>>>> the future transition into the new sudo-sub panel. All that would
>>>> be needed is to remove the breakers from the old box re-run wire
>>>> from J-box 1 to the new sudo-sub, as well as re-routing the 240V
>>>> lines from the above stage panel to the sudo-sub (and of course
>>>> preform all the main -> suod-sub work). as far as existing vs
>>>> proposed. only the sub panels mentioned above exist currently-
>>>> I'll make a note to call out the existing stuff in the drawings.
>>>> Thanks, Whit On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Cere Mona Davis
>>>> <ceremona(a)gmail.com <mailto:ceremona@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi
>>>> everyone. It's the first time I have looked at these plans and I
>>>> have some questions and thoughts. Dave said he won't be able to
>>>> respond to this email until a couple of days as he is out in the
>>>> boonies somewhere. So I am writing in to expedite some issues
>>>> that I think he will likely bring up in the days ahead. Whit,
>>>> thanks for drawing up these plans! For someone who is not
>>>> intimately familiar with our electrical layout the plans might
>>>> need a more clear description of existing electrical vs. proposed
>>>> new electrical, however. In multiple conversations with Dave (and
>>>> one on-site visit) he has mentioned repeatedly that we will want
>>>> to shoot for putting in another sub panel for the sudoroom off of
>>>> the main panel as the end-game; rather than daisy-chaining off of
>>>> an existing panel (the balcony) as what seems to be proposed
>>>> here. If we can't immediately put in a sub panel into the room,
>>>> due to cost, we should at-least be planning for conduit and
>>>> wiring paths, etc that allows for a sudoroom sub-panel in the
>>>> future. Thoughts? -Cere On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:23 AM,
>>>> <hol(a)gaskill.com <mailto:hol@gaskill.com>> wrote: Thanks
Yar!
>>>> Whit can you liaise w/ Dave RE how much of the work is going to
>>>> be done under the first permit? Cheers, Hol On 2014-09-04 23:16,
>>>> yar wrote: Hi all, Dave Pedroli is a certified electrician who's
>>>> offered to review our plans to give them an okay. I'm copying him
>>>> and the people who've been most involved with electrical work.
>>>> Dave, the latest plans are attached, and also available online[1
>>>>
<https://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/2014-August/007369.html>].
>>>> Could you please look them over and write us a few
>>>> formal-sounding sentences that boil down to "hello I am a real
>>>> electrician and I say these plans are solid"? This will help us
>>>> make the landlord happy so he will let us do them. Thank you!!
>>>> [1]
>>>>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/pipermail/sudo-discuss/2014-August/007369.html
>>>> -- Best Regards, Cere Davis ceremona(a)gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:ceremona@gmail.com> ------------------- GPG Key:
>>>>
http://taffy.findpage.com/~cere/pubkey.asc
>>>> <http://taffy.findpage.com/%7Ecere/pubkey.asc> GPG fingerprint
>>>> (ID# 73FCA9E6) : F5C7 627B ECBE C735 117B 2278 9A95 4C88 73FC A9E6
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org