Re: [sudo-discuss] [omni-discuss] someone is stealing things at sudoroom / the omni

i suggest the solution be scrapped like so many sweet sweet copper windings???? On 2015-03-26 19:53, johanna faust wrote: that's a great idea! one problem: there is a chance the thief is reading > this. i suggest the solution be scrapped, and best discussed at the next > meeting, which i really want to be at, so if someone wants to give me a > ride from downtown oakland in the event i am less than adequately mobile, i > would gladly and quickly take them up on it. > once again, thanks @Autonomous for the suggestion, and especially for > the clear and comprehensive description & instructions thereof. > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Autonomous <autonomous666(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Since the thief steals copper I suggest setting up a nicely presented > coil of copper wires discretely connected to an Arduino board on digital > pin 2 and ground, with pinMode() set to INPUT_PULLUP. When the copper has > been removed it will open the switch triggering an interrupt function that > will log the event as well as possibly activate other devices such as a > loud alarm. > Then what would you do after the thief is caught red-handed? > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Cere Mona Davis <ceremona(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I think that's a totally reasonable proposal. > On Mar 26, 2015 4:02 PM, "niki" <niki.shelley(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Why can't the 48th St. doors be the primary access to Sudo / CCL when > the bookstore is closed? > Sudo / CCL & other member collective members still having full access to > the building, of course, but not the general public as is currently the > case. > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, <hol(a)gaskill.com> wrote: > unless la commune maintains primary access to their space by passing > through sudo room I'd say the 2 positions are consistent > On 2015-03-26 14:52, niki wrote: > I just want to mention that there was very, very, very strong objection > from Sudo Room when La Commune wanted to lock up our space and, as a > result, our space has remained open at all hours. > Is this suggestion a reversal of that position? > N > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, johanna faust <female.faust(a)gmail.com> wrote: > i agree. was hoping this wouldn't happen. > sigh > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana(a)gmail.com> wrote: > And I've thought this one through for a while, I'm not just thinking > it's a good idea. It would narrow down suspects effectively, without losing > our ability to share with the public, if done well > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Rachel Wolfsohn <rawjnana(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. Locks on Sudo/CCL, all three doors, so that members can > actually close up the equipment whether commons is open or closed! > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Ryan <yandoryn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Or stealing my only cell phone charger _out of my backpack_. > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org> wrote: > the other day i noticed a bunch of copper wires I had near the robot > were gone. I thought it was strange that they were all taken. > today Rob mentioned that someone has taken all the copper windings off > of his project. He also says that a week ago, his phone was stolen from > where it was with his shirt, and his shirt was found outside. > We all should have seen this coming but I really don't want this to keep > happening. I think we might need to start thinking about locks on the > sudoroom/CCL space, on all three doors connecting the room. > when members close down the space they will be able to lock the doors > and then we don't have to worry as much about people tearing apart our hard > work so they can cash in copper to get a few bucks... > -jake > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss(a)lists.omnicommons.org > https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss [1] > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss(a)lists.omnicommons.org > https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss [1]