Hi,
"This error continues to
this day, in the ideology of Black Block tactics, which are founded on
the idea that expressing rage and provoking police over-reaction will
somehow spark The Revolution."
You don't seem to understand what Black Block tactics are. While I
understand your point that provoking the police is probably not a great
tactic, I fail to see what this has to do with The Black Block and Occupy
Oakland. It didn't take much to provoke police overreaction, unless you
call standing your ground at an "unlawful assembly" a "Black Block
Tactic".
Again here is the wikipedia page (
) .
Perhaps maybe the tactic you are talking about (direct confrontation with
police or closer to
)
has more to do with showing people that the police only have power because
we give it to them.
"The proletariat is where the power is: the power to produce and consume
at the level that drives the engine of oligarchy, is also the power to
refuse consent in a meaningful way."
Lets be clear, the real power is in the hands of the oligarchy and will
remain in the hands of the oligarchy as long as the banks, government, and
wall street are working together to make sure that the
lumpenproletariat starves
so they can feast. Begging for $.50 raises, and a few more days of slick
time, the green economy (ie. simple living ... These are the distractions
There are people making 50 million a year while others scrounge for just
enough to survive. What keeps the oligarchy in power is our refusal
to believe that we can actually do something about that and.......
" by going into business for themselves, and by
developing alternatives to conventional capitalism such as cooperatives
and other forms of production that subordinate capital to labor."
it seems like our (proletariat's) only move is to join the oligarchs,
by imitation. Which is impossible. Alternatives to capitalism that feed off
capitalism are not the answer. Co-operative are great, but they are just as
much on their radar as squirrel strikes.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:30 PM, aestetix <aestetix(a)aestetix.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
You've opened a can of worms here :)
Since elucidated discussion seems to be the modus operandi lately, I
have a few thoughts on this matter that are worth contributing. Feel
free to ignore at your pleasure (free listening is just as important
as free speech).
I think that the two key elements of your essays, food and power, are
rather interchangeable depending on the contexts. It's (hopefully)
obvious why we need food. Power in a more abstract sense is
fascinating to me, though. Other words that come to mind are drive,
charisma, persuasion, but also intellect, and most important, control.
IMHO, one of the most fundamental elements of control is language, as
shared patterns are effectively a way to communicate and attain
various levels of self-mastery. An easy way to experience this is to
try to understand a foreign language: there might be some hints of
familiarity within the chaos, and as we find them, it's a bit like
setting markers around, and using the markers to control the direction
of your ultimate understanding. You can extend that to vocabulary and
concepts as well. One of the hallmarks of a good education is the
ability to curse someone out without using the generic "fuck shit
damn" slurs.
Language is composed of words, symbols which point to meanings, and
one of the most interesting set of words is our names. And you all can
guess where I'm going with this one ;)
Hail Eris,
aestetix
PS: it might be worth doing another cryptoparty soon.
On 5/3/13 7:58 PM, GtwoG PublicOhOne wrote:
2) Where the power is, and where it isn't.
Now we come to the proletariat and the lumpenproletariat.
For this, credit also goes to a good friend of mine who I won't
name here, but who's welcome to name him/herself if s/he so
chooses: s/he got me thinking down this trail a few months ago.
The proletariat is the working class: basically defined as people
who have full-time jobs or at least jobs that provide sufficient
income for the core necessities (shelter, clothing, food,
transportation, sanitation, communication), but who have little or
no ownership stake. This includes people who are in business for
themselves, but earning a working class income: they own their
employment, but their economic wellbeing is at the same level as
that of a wage-worker.
The lumpenproletariat is the level below that: basically defined
as people whose employment is marginal at best, and whose access to
the basic necessities is frequently interrupted in some way. The
unemployed, homeless, couch-surfers (another form of
homelessness), people who live at the margins of the law in order
to survive, and people who earn their livings on criminal activity.
This also includes wage-workers whose wage income is not sufficient
to provide their basic necessities from month to month: they have
jobs, but their economic wellbeing is at the same level as that of
someone who's marginally employed at best.
Decades ago, the Bay Area left/radical community made the deadly
strategic error of embracing the (essentially Maoist) analysis that
the lumpenproletariat is the revolutionary class. This error
continues to this day, in the ideology of Black Block tactics,
which are founded on the idea that expressing rage and provoking
police over-reaction will somehow spark The Revolution.
The very same tactic in more obviously violent form pops up in the
ideology of the extreme right: such as the Hutaree, a group that
was busted by the FBI for planning to shoot a bunch of cops and
then set off bombs at their funerals, in the attempt to provoke
martial law and thereby set off a "revolution" from the extreme
right.
But here's the nexus of the problem:
To the oligarchy, the lumpenproletariat is disposable: their roles
in production and consumption are so minimal that they can be
totally disregarded. They have NO power. N-O power. As
individuals or as any kind of collectivity or class.
When a social movement identifies with the lumpenproletariat
and/or attempts to organize the lumpenproletariat, the movement
effectively short-circuits its efforts into something that is
inherently doomed to failure. They may as well be trying to
organize the squirrels on the Cal Berkeley campus to strike for
better teaching-assistant salaries. How seriously do you think the
UC Regents would take the threat of a squirrel strike?
The proletariat is where the power is: the power to produce and
consume at the level that drives the engine of oligarchy, is also
the power to refuse consent in a meaningful way.
The power of the proletariat takes two forms:
One, the power to remove themselves from the oligarch's engines of
production: by going on strike (which translates to the power of
collective bargaining), by going into business for themselves, and
by developing alternatives to conventional capitalism such as
cooperatives and other forms of production that subordinate capital
to labor.
Two, the power to remove themselves from the oligarch's
consumption matrix: by boycotts (consumer strikes), by
anti-materialist or "simple living" principles that reduce
consumption levels (the equivalent of consumer general strikes), by
shifting their consumption to alternative institutions such as
coops, credit unions, and small local producers (e.g. buying
veggies at the farmers' market rather than Safeway), and very
importantly for _us_ as hackers/makers/etc., the power to build
for our own use.
This is real power. It's the power that makes the oligarchs quake
in their boots and have nightmares. And it's the power that gives
the oligarchs strong incentive to keep us distracted, digressed,
and disempowered by wasting our time trying to organize a squirrel
strike.
-G.
_______________________________________________ sudo-discuss
mailing list sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools -
http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRhKrzAAoJEOrRfDwkjbpTcpYH/3IJBLu1MDMCb8D9V7zLXgOq
rH3KhX+6KUj3RWqDHhzJaOSI4/NS+S3XHEHFxYF8IkVp53D7PWEVHts6Src0lqGl
24LDzebRm07O4A/v4j1d0wqSC7nOubuIrf1Ys20V4N4jNjH8TQo8oasxFUupYp6M
BhuDNr3/b4n4mARK0GOxUgzVKblKtMTxQAlBeKkCoj91IpXxrxj7g1kgh5k2KurU
lSU4BjVs/47vpU5voBpDz5Ket7UTkFNS4WTBVQyGojEQsGrJ8hgu/LjpNpqAv4va
aMA78kmFIOSfFDRZWkM+dbS4F5BRtCytTXOvY0PQqM1eDOWAlYm2/IutTZoe9V4=
=BePK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss