There's noticing to say - everyone that lives there is on a lease in a
house. We already live here. The plan knows more people are coming, so we
better have somewhere for them to live when they get here.
The current w o houses are old. They rent for about $500/ bedroom. The new
people coming can afford to pay more than that, and they want something
newer than what is currently there. SO BUILD IT FOR THEM.
If we don't build new buildings for new people the new people will move
into our buildings and then we will have DISPLACEMENT.
On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Romy Snowyla <romy(a)snowyla.com> wrote:
I like how the Indymedia article discusses the humans
currently living on
west Oakland. What will happen to them?
Why are these people not discussed in the plan? How come the elderly black
people aren't being drawn in the architectural mock ups?
I'm not interested in discussing how useful or not useful calendaring
apps are.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 17, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Romy, I'm pretty sure that all official municipal development plans have
always been public.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Romy Snowyla <romy(a)snowyla.com> wrote:
It's interesting how you're all so quick to attack the article especially
when it makes a couple of good points.
Not all of it is valid but it provides a needed transparency ..
Sent from my iPhone
On May 17, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Suburban living is the solution to population increase? Explain?
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Romy Snowyla <romy(a)snowyla.com> wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with Indy media although I don't agree with
everything they say. They aren't driving rent up though so don't place all
the blame on rent control. Any new real estate development will provide
relatively few affordable units for shrine class people
My main motivation for passing the email along was just so everything is
clear and not obfuscated . The master plans in sf that have transformed the
mission like Godzilla were never very clear to the public
I don't understand the need to disparage calendar apps or apps in general.
Many innovations are through things like process or paper checklists
instead of 3D printers and drones. Being dismissive of those innovations is
illogical
Sent from my iPhone
On May 17, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Sonja Trauss <sonja.trauss(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is an Orwellian notion of anti-displacement.
In the face of increased population these people seek to build nothing
new. I really can't understand what they think is going to happen when the
population goes up but the housing stock doesn't.
Sf tried that! Look what's happening there! It sucks!
This is the saddest thing to me because all efforts like this do, is make
building more expensive and difficult. That means the only things that get
built are at higher price points. Or, if they're slightly successful,
whole projects are blocked, and they miss the opportunity to get capital to
build something useful, instead of something stupid like a new calendaring
app.
On Friday, May 16, 2014, Romy Snowyla <romy(a)snowyla.com> wrote:
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/04/18/18754399.php
WOSP – City of Oakland’s Plan for Gentrification: A Target For
Anti-Displacement Activity : Indybay
[image:
1888463_10151853655272163_918216235_n]<http://advancethestruggle.files.w…
Advertisement for Public Release of WOSP in Feb. 2014
March 29, 2014
*Snapshot of the State and Capital in the Bay Area*
If the Bay Area’s economy was compared to every other national economy in
the world, it would be the 19th largest. The Bay has the highest GDP per
capita in the entire United States, and even outpaces Lo