Sonja you haven't read the article at all. It's pro development it just questions
what kind of development .
I'm not sure what interests you represent but the article is a fair and balanced point
of view that needs to be heard . You don't even discuss anything in the article but
bash app makers - we need to talk about social impact and the human lives of people who
live in osklsnd right now
Sent from my iPhone
On May 17, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Sonja Trauss
<sonja.trauss(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Andrew Lowe
<andrew(a)lostways.com> wrote:
Sonja, no one is saying we shouldn't build new housing. But, this has nothing to do
with population increases. Its about attracting more people from the outside to Oakland
and attracting not just more people, but more rich people.
The causation is backwards here. The rich people are coming/ here no matter what.
THATS WHY developers and cities want to build. They see an opportunity and they want to
take advantage of it. Cities are playing the long game: all cities go through periods of
investment and growth then years of disinvestment and abandonment.
We live in the result of yesterday's, yesterday's growth. The building I live in
is 150 years old.
Capital wants to build. Money is here trying to turn into infrastructure and housing.
There is no other way this stuff gets built other than through private capital. Even when
cities build things, what do they do? They float bonds - private capital has to decide a
city is worth investing in.
Let them build. The crash will come. The money, the bullshit app, will disappear. The new
housing will still exist.
There is no need to build expensive condos on San
Pablo . no one in the neighborhood wants that but the landlords. A long time resident
(more than 30 years I believe) on my block ( which is in this plan) was just evicted and
the landlord for another place on the street is trying to raise the rent 50% in order to
kick out my friends so he can build lofts.
Suburban living is the solution to population increase,
What
> not urban development. But again population increase isn't the problem the city
is trying to solve. Their problem is that SF is rolling in tax income and they want a
piece of the pie.
>
>> On May 17, 2014 9:30 AM, "Sonja Trauss" <sonja.trauss(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> This is an Orwellian notion of anti-displacement.
>>
>> In the face of increased population these people seek to build nothing new. I
really can't understand what they think is going to happen when the population goes up
but the housing stock doesn't.
>>
>> Sf tried that! Look what's happening there! It sucks!
>>
>> This is the saddest thing to me because all efforts like this do, is make
building more expensive and difficult. That means the only things that get built are at
higher price points. Or, if they're slightly successful, whole projects are blocked,
and they miss the opportunity to get capital to build something useful, instead of
something stupid like a new calendaring app.
>>
>> On Friday, May 16, 2014, Romy Snowyla <romy(a)snowyla.com> wrote:
>>
>>
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/04/18/18754399.php
>>
>> WOSP – City of Oakland’s Plan for Gentrification: A Target For Anti-Displacement
Activity : Indybay
>>
>>
>> Advertisement for Public Release of WOSP in Feb. 2014
>>
>> March 29, 2014
>>
>> Snapshot of the State and Capital in the Bay Area
>>
>> If the Bay Area’s economy was compared to every other national economy in the
world, it would be the 19th largest. The Bay has the highest GDP per capita in the entire
United States, and even outpaces London and Singapore. It captures 40% of the entire flow
of venture capital in the US (p11), which constitutes a higher amount of capital than that
captured during the
dot.com boom. While the Bay accounts for only 2.4% of the total jobs
in the US, it has 12% of the computer & electronics manufacturing, 10.3% of software
development, and 8.3% of internet related jobs (p13.) Seven of the top 10 social media
companies are here – Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Twitter, Linkedin, Zynga, and Yelp. In
short, the Bay is home to one of the highest concentrations of capital in the world and
mapping out the composition of capital is key for us to situate ourselves as we continue
to engage in class combat. (Footnote #1)
>>
>> The regional state is well aware of its place within the world economy. Over the
past years, city politicians from the greater Bay Area have come together to generate a 30
year strategy about how to restructure the region’s housing, employment, and
transportation structures. Plan Bay Area (PBA) was developed by the Association of Bay
Area Governments (ABAG) to carry out the tasks of determining how the state can support
and facilitate the accumulation of capital throughout the region. In order to grease the
wheels of the local capitalist economy, the PBA aims to redevelop housing and transit
throughout the Bay; New units are set to be built, new transportation “hubs” developed,
and both of these projects are to be coordinated across single cities and the bay area as
a whole.
>>
>> PBA aims to align the various metropolitan areas of the Bay in their development
of housing to match projected increases in employment. Internet, computer and electronics
manufacturing, along with professional, scientific and technical services are accounting
for some of the largest contributors to job creation here. PBA states that between early
2011 and late 2013 the Bay Area added more than 200,000 jobs, an increase of 7.5 percent
that is well above the state’s average of 4.5%. PBA is projecting that this area will
continue to outpace the rest of California and the US in its share of job growth due to
the heavy concentration of tech related industries which forms part of the economic base
of Bay Area political economy. (Footnote#2)
>>
>> West Oakland Specific Plan – One Part of Capital/State’s Total Plan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss