15 Oct
2014
15 Oct
'14
3:29 p.m.
It's the posting on Facebook, not the list, that recently came to my
attention as potentially risky, so I was seeking advice on the matter.
Jake, you make an excellent point... though I can't speak for Aaron, a hero
rallying against but also a victim of a system that imposes arbitrary and
overly-harsh punishments on copyright violations. Better to be aware of the
risks and protect from costly ramifications, no? Just putting a disclaimer
that Omni is open to members and their guests (on the fb event) would
probably be fine.
Jenny
http://jennyryan.net
http://thepyre.org
http://thevirtualcampfire.org
http://technomadic.tumblr.com
`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
"Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
-Laurie Anderson
"Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
-Hannah Arendt
"To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
-Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org> wrote:
I disagree. Sudoroom is not "open to the
public" it's a membership
organization and members can invite guests. So we can watch whatever we
want together.
jeez you guys, what would Aaron say?
-jake
On Oct. 15th April wrote:
Unfortunately, the best advice is not to hold a public screening of a
film without having a license to screen it. But let's talk about this
off-line. I'll be at Sudo tonight to get knighted as a member-friend.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss