3 Nov
2021
3 Nov
'21
5:20 p.m.
banning someone for trying to set an actual fire in the building seems
pretty cut and dried
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:17 PM Marc Juul <juul(a)labitat.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:01 PM David Keenan <dkeenan44(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am guessing the safe space ban process would
be, he is safe-space
banned by you, which could then be affirmed by Sudo and/or delegates to
take to a consensed or group-level ban of a person. Then he presumably
would be added to Omni's 'banned
<https://omnicommons.org/wiki/Banned>'
page, with a brief description.
We can also just consent to ban someone at either a collective's own
meeting or Omni's meeting. Bringing conflicts directly to the Omni meeting
shouldn't be done except as a last resort but I wouldn't categorize this as
a conflict.
--
marc/juul
_______________________________________________
consensus mailing list
consensus(a)lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus