22 Jan
2014
22 Jan
'14
1:48 p.m.
Additionally, in regards to speaking on behalf of these groups - I would recommend looking
into the limitations and reporting requirements for political lobbying for traditional
501(c)(3)s like Sudo Room & BAPS -before proceeding too far, especially with the
status pending.
sent from eddan.com
On Jan 22, 2014, at 11:53 AM, David Keenan
<dkeenan44(a)gmail.com> wrote:
eddan,
thank you for this! i will come to sudo tonight. Is the meeting at 6:30, or what is the
time?
What is needed are white papers against the dac, that set out clearly the actual scope of
the dac and stake out our position against it in point-by-point terms at the level of
moral-political logic. Does anything like that exist?
Showing up at public comment at council meetings is fine, but frankly at the same time
the attitudes of some at public comment also has had a tendency to just piss off the
various people in govt who are also against the dac and mostly ignore the content. These
people, various aides and such, who really are on our side, need be able to articulate
arguments against the dac in a noncombative manner, that can be framed in a language that
isnt polemical or too emotional but simply sensible.
Im going to start a working group / class out of baps on this also -
best,
david
david
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, eddan.com
<eddan(a)sudoroom.tv> wrote:
Hi David & Sudo folk -
Just wanted to remind folks that the Oakland Privacy Working Group (meeting tonight at
Sudo Room) has been trying to coordinate a robust and effective response to the Oakland
DAC funding in this crucial several week window at the City Council.
It is of course important for everyone who's willing to work to try and stop this to
do what they can. It might be helpful though to make sure coordination is taking place so
that one part of our collective effort isn't seen as legitimizing a process we are
trying to shut down by supporting it through fixing it.
Subscription to the listserv is at oaklandprivacyworkinggroup-subscribe(a)lists.riseup.net.
It would also be great if you could support the petition at
http://www.change.org/petitions/the-mayor-and-city-council-of-oakland-ca-do…
and continue spreading the word.
For those interested, there is also a meeting of the League of Women Voters on this topic
tonight (http://www.lwvoakland.org/VOTER-January-2014.html). There will also be an event
of relevant interest in Berkeley tomorrow night
(https://www.eff.org/event/nsa-surveillance-and-our-almost-orwellian-state).
-Eddan
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 at 6:55 PM, David Keenan wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> a friend of mine who works for the city of Oakland and is meeting with the ACLU on
DAC stuff (to fix this nightnare) has asked me for
>
> - a coherent, semi-formal argument against the DAC.
>
> - Language against specific aspects of the DAC like the shot spotters, facial
recognition, etc. What they will be used for vs what they say they will be used for, etc.
>
> What resources do we have on hand that I can forward or write up for them?
>
> Thanks!
> David
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss