Good points Sam and I agree that any improvements in
neighborhoods should
be inclusive to ensure that a broad range of residents (not just middle to
high income) can continue to be part of the community, it's after all the
diversity that enriches our community both racially, artistically and
creatively. A big part of that is ensuring that a broad range of housing is
available for all budgets (which cities like SF have failed to deliver on,
which appears to be due to strong anti-growth mentalities which prices
those who can least afford it out).
Saying that, I'm just not a fan of how the term gentrification is being
used, it seems divisive to me, them and us, if we're a community space,
surely we should embrace all of those who wish to add to the community and
share their skill sets (regardless of race, income, creed or gender
preferences and hold to non-discrimination). Google engineers are being
vilified and yet I think it's a failure of governmental institutions to
develop adequate policies to ensure a full range of housing and services
are available for those who need it most and not engineers who are just
looking for a decent place to live at a reasonable price.
I'd definitely embrace a balanced dialog and on the pros and cons and how
we can insure a more inclusive Oakland for everyone :)
All the best,
Ryan
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Sam Tepper <sam.tepper(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the link, Ryan. I don't think
people doubt that
gentrification has its upsides - that's why it's so sought after for so
many people - but there are two main downsides, I'd say, that are against
the values we generally try to hold at Sudo Room.
1. Gentrification and its benefits target white middle-class families.
Even if many or most original residents who stay are financially better
off, those who are left are far less diverse, and racism plays a
fundamental role in the gentrification process.
2. Gentrified neighborhoods are generally home to fewer artists,
immigrants, and even aspiring hackers because these people can frequently
be poor to the point of destitution, even when their skill level is high.
We do need to address the positives in order to have a dialog, to educate
and address the problems behind most gentrification efforts, and try to
increase financial health and stability in more positive, socially
responsible ways.
-Sam
On 05/11/2014 02:38 PM, Ryan Bethencourt wrote:
I'm intrigued by this discussion, what's seemed odd to me for a while is
that the conversation seems to be very one sided, i.e. all gentrification
is bad, yet what about if it isn't? What if a rising tide lifts all boats?
I came across an article a while back that was published on NPR (not
known for being biased one way or the other) which discussed the data which
actually tended to support the positive aspects of gentrification for
residents of poorer neighborhoods. It's worth a read:
"We're finding that the financial health of original residents in
gentrifying neighborhoods seems to be increasing, as compared to original
residents in nongentrifying, low-priced neighborhoods," says Daniel
Hartley, a research economist with the bank."
http://www.npr.org/2014/01/22/264528139/long-a-dirty-word-gentrification-ma…
I would also make the argument that spaces like Sudo Room, Public
Schools, LOL space, Counter Culture labs and etc actually make a net
positive impact for the entire community and yet do have a gentrifying
effect. We have much work yet to do but communal spaces, open education
and the maker movement have the potential to empower many communities and I
say that as someone that hopes to do more to help lift others up, I think
most of us are of the same mindset?
Upwards and Onwards!
Ryan
Sonja Trauss <sonja.trauss(a)gmail.com>
May 11, 2014 at 10:43 AM
Quick point - you guys know that it was the housing market crash
(sudden DECREASE in home values) that set off waves of foreclosures, right?
In other words, suppose you're in one of these loans. You realized what
is about to happen to you ("FUCK! I can't afford the mortgage after reset!)
let's look at two scenereos:
Scenereo one: the value of your house has increased since you purchased
it two years ago. The house is worth more than you owe on it, and there are
many buyers interested in buying homes like yours in your area.
Scenereo two: the value of your home has decreased since you purchased
it two years ago. The house is worth less than you owe on it, and there are
very few people interested in buying homes like yours in your area.
Which scenero is better for you? What do you do in each scenereo?
On Sunday, May 11, 2014, Autonomous <autonomous666(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
Autonomous <autonomous666(a)gmail.com>
May 11, 2014 at 9:56 AM
Oakland gentrification is very well planned &
executed
Indeed. It is particularly reprehensible that specific neighborhoods in
Oakland were targeted for predatory loans and fraudulent foreclosures. The
attached image shows foreclosures in Oakland represented by small dots
which is overlaid onto demographic data showing non-white neighborhoods in
red and white neighborhoods in blue. See a pattern here? This is a form of
economic warfare targeted against people of color who have lost a massive
amount of wealth while investors have moved in to profit from the resulting
increase in real estate values.
The scam involves a loan with very low interest for a period of two
years followed by a dramatic increase in interest. When people ask for a
loan modification, they are told they need to miss a payment in order to
qualify - it's in the servicing contract. Then, upon missing one payment,
the bank refuses to accept any more payments by giving the run-around and
the home is subsequently foreclosed upon. If that wasn't enough, people are
forcibly removed from their homes by illegal eviction proceedings.
Typically the unfortunate former homeowner only learns about the eviction
when the police show up to kick them out on the street along with all their
possessions. This is because they aren't served properly and have no idea a
court action even existed. This pattern was repeated over and over in
Oakland, as you can see in the attached image.
[image: Inline image 2]
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd(a)gmail.com>
May 10, 2014 at 7:33 PM
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:29 PM, <batkid(a)gmx.com> wrote:
Oh good - I was getting worried about having too many museum shows and
cat video festivals in the neighborhood...
Patrik
-----Original message-----
Sent: Saturday, 10 May 2014 at 21:30:39
From: "Romy Snowyla" <romy(a)snowyla.com>
To: "Sudo Room Discussion List" <sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org>
Subject: [sudo-discuss] Oakland gentrification is very well planned &
executed
The museum shows, the cat festival.. I guess we are all part of the
master plan : P
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing
listsudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.orghttps://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
batkid(a)gmx.com
May 10, 2014 at 7:29 PM
Don't worry, Oakland won't become the East Hamptons anytime soon
http://www.insidebayarea.com/news/ci_25737160/oakland-man-shot-driving-truc…
http://www.insidebayarea.com/news/ci_25732368/jurors-convict-man-murdering-…
http://www.insidebayarea.com/news/ci_25731273/oakland-man-dies-from-injurie…
-----Original message-----
Sent: Saturday, 10 May 2014 at 21:30:39
From: "Romy Snowyla" <romy(a)snowyla.com> <romy(a)snowyla.com>
To: "Sudo Room Discussion List"
<sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org><sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org>
Subject: [sudo-discuss] Oakland gentrification is very well planned &
executed
The museum shows, the cat festival.. I guess we are all part of the
master plan : P
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
--
--
Ryan Bethencourt
Tel: (415) 825 2705
ryan.bethencourt(a)gmail.com
@ryanbethencourt
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing
listsudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.orghttps://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
--
Ryan Bethencourt
Tel: (415) 825 2705
Conf Call: (650) 741 5013
ryan.bethencourt(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org