You could carry a boombox around playing loud
music where ever you go.
Perhaps this would be the end of earbuds. :-)
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
People have rendered surveillance cameras useless
with very bright IR
LEDs in their fields of view.
Could something similar be done for sound recording devices?
On Mar 5, 2013 6:17 AM, "Anon195714" <anon195714(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Yo's-
>
> Something I forgot to add re. DARPA's desire for universal recording of
> face-to-face conversations.
>
> What's the ideal device for doing all that recording?
>
> How'bout something you wear? How'bout something that "everyone"
wears?,
> or even a significant fraction of "everyone"?
>
> Like maybe Google Glasses.
>
> Always on, camera and mic always "connected" to "the cloud."
Orwell's
> telescreen gone mobile.
>
> Everyone who wears them will become, in effect, _unpaid surveillance
> drones_ watching their family and friends, not from up in the sky, but
> from up close where every word can be heard.
>
> Some will say "oh, there's no stopping technology." People said that
> about the atomic bomb and the hydrogen bomb. But public outcry led
> first to treaties and then to progressive degrees of nuclear
> disarmament. We haven't used that technology since it was first used in
> WW2.
>
> We can stop pernicious tech if we choose. We can refuse, we can
> withdraw consent, we do not have to press the Buy button.
>
> Technology should liberate and empower people. "Conveniences with a few
> strings attached" are not liberation, they're puppet-strings.
>
> It's all about control: technology that you can control, vs. technology
> that can control you.
>
> -G.
>
>
> =====
>
>
> On 13-03-05-Tue 1:50 AM, Anon195714 wrote:
>> Yo's-
>>
>> This just in:
>>
>> "DARPA wants to make [voice recognition/transcription] systems so
>> accurate, you’ll be able to easily record, transcribe and recall all
>> the
>> conversations you ever have. ... Imagine living in a world where every
>> errant utterance you make is preserved forever. ... DARPA [awarded
>> U.Texas comp sci researcher Matt Lease]... $300,000... over two years
>> to
>> study the new project, called “Blending Crowdsourcing with Automation
>> for Fast, Cheap, and Accurate Analysis of Spontaneous Speech.”"
>>
>> "The idea is that business meetings or even conversations with your
>> friends and family could be stored in archives and easily searched.
>> The
>> stored recordings could be held in servers, owned either by
>> individuals
>> or their employers. ... The answer, Lease says, is in widespread use
>> of
>> recording technologies like smartphones, cameras and audio
>> recorders...
>> [A] memorandum from the Congressional Research Service described [an
>> earlier DARPA project of this type known as] EARS, as focusing on
>> speech
>> picked up from broadcasts and telephone conversations, “as well as
>> extract clues about the identity of speakers” for “the military,
>> intelligence and law enforcement communities.”"
>>
>>
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/03/darpa-speech/ (Yes, "real
>> geeks
>> don't read Wired," but nonetheless its news pages are useful for
>> keeping
>> a finger on the pulse of Big Brother and his corporate Brethren.)
>>
>> In short:
>>
>> DARPA is researching the means by which every conversation you have,
>> in-person, whether at work or with family or friends, gets picked up
>> by
>> the mic in your smartphone or other portable device, and stored on a
>> server, where DARPA's algorithms and human editors turn all of it into
>> fast-searchable text, that could be used by your employer, the
>> military,
>> law enforcement, and intel agencies. Presumably the credit bureaus,
>> insurance companies, and financial institutions will want "in" on the
>> data as well.
>>
>> Now connect that with this, about cell-site tracking and call detail
>> records:
>>
>> "The government maintained [that] Americans have no expectation of
>> privacy of such cell-site records [call detail records or CDR] because
>> they are in the possession of a third party — the mobile phone
>> companies."
>>
>>
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/gps-drug-dealer-retrial/
>>
>> The key point is that the gov's current position is that data stored
>> on
>> a third party's servers have "no expectation of privacy." What
begins
>> with CDR will eventually include voicemail messages stored on the
>> mobile
>> phone companies' servers, and then eventually all of your live
>> in-person
>> conversations that are stored "in the cloud."
>>
>> "Anything you say can and will be used against you..." Mark my words.
>>
>> Meanwhile people keep using gmail and Google Voice, and smartphones
>> from
>> which they can't remove the batteries. Because nothing is more
>> important
>> than "convenience," right?
>>
>> As a character in a sci-fi piece I wrote in the mid-1980s said, "Why
>> put
>> a person in prison, when you can put prison in the person instead?"
>>
>> -G.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
--
-steve
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org