6 Feb
2014
6 Feb
'14
7:14 a.m.
Lol
On Thursday, February 6, 2014, Matthew Senate <mattsenate(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry Hol, I have to interrupt your email with a Point
of Process:
I don't think this proposal should go back on the table because it fell
off and it has a nasty dust bunny stuck in the frosting.
// Satt Menate
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Hol Gaskill
<hol@gaskill.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hol@gaskill.com');>
wrote:
all of those words make sense to me - should we
attempt to define
bureaucracy somehow? i volunteer to spearhead a committee to report in
every 3 weeks and collect input from members via approved channels, which
will then be reprocessed through cumulative human error then regurgitated
according to whatever schedule is ratified by a separate subcommittee which
I leave to someone else to spearhead and really get the ball rolling.
Feb 5, 2014 09:05:41 PM,
mattsenate@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mattsenate@gmail.com');>wrote:
Hey all,
>"Value fairness and common sense over prolonged process and bureaucracy."
>You can see it here:
https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association/Value_fairness
>// Matt
>_______________________________________________
>sudo-discuss mailing list
>sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org');>
>http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
Thinking about hacking the values a bit based on our continued
experience. What do
folks think about adding this new value to guide us
into the grayer, murkier, brighter, and wonderful future?
And the diff:
https://sudoroom.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Articles_of_Association%2FVa…