11 Jan
2015
11 Jan
'15
6:09 p.m.
This is not relevant to this particular conversation, IMHO. Not to mention
that to even jokingly suggest "point-man" as a potential candidate exhibits
a real insensitivity / obtuseness to some of the very issues that were
raised in requesting an alternative to "bottom-liner" and exhibits behavior
associated with systems that we, as a community, are working to confront
and dismantle.
I realize that for some people, language "doesn't matter" but, regardless
of whether it's important to you or not to care about such things, I'd like
to ask you to please be mindful of the fact that for some people, certain
words choices represent oppressive systems.
So perhaps, if I could make a gentle suggestion, take a moment to consider
those that may be on this mailing list and in this community and who might
not enjoy the same level of privilege that you do. Using certain language
or dismissing the importance of caring about language can be construed as
oppressive, insensitive and can be incredibly hurtful and alienating.
Niki
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Tony Barreca <tony.barreca(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Actually, if the opposing forces are reasonably
well-trained, the point
man is usually not the first guy to get shot.
A well-trained opponent will typically let him (or her, perhaps, nowadays)
get safely past so they have a much higher probability of killing all who
follow.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Jan 11, 2015 1:49 PM, "Ryan" <yandoryn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
--
Tony Barreca
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/tonybarreca
Skype: tonybarreca
Twitter: tbarreca
Mobile: (510) 710-5864
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
A point person, on the other hand, is the person
you have to go to in
order to get involved at all. How do I get involved? *points
at person*
Actually, I think "point man" presumably comes from military
terminology: it's the soldier who is "on point" in a patrol, and who gets
to scout out the best route, but who also gets shot at first if things go
wrong. Perhaps not the best imagery we want to adopt...
Patrik
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Patrik D'haeseleer <patrikd(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Stephen Novotny <
novotny.stephen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> To add to discussion: I believe one of the reason some of us began to
discuss changing "bottom-liner" is because it promotes arresting a single
person with all of the responsibility, rather than collectivizing
responsibility toward building community.
>
> Meh - I think "point person" conveys exactly the same meaning to me. I
had never heard of the term "bottom-liner" before, so to my ear this
just
seems like a pointless exercise in semantics.
>
> In the end, the mechanism is still that we appoint an individual to
carry
somewhat more responsibility for an event, because otherwise things
will inevitably fall through the cracks. You can call them a bottom-liner,
a facilitator, a coordinator, a point person or whatever you want. Does it
suggest an unequal division of labor? Sure it does, but that just reflects
reality. We can strive for a more equal distribution, but in my opinion
just changing the name is not going to change the fact that some people put
in more effort than others, or that in some cases it is actually more
efficient for one person to take charge of certain details.
>
> What's in a name? that which we call a rose by any other name would
smell
as sweet...
>
> Patrik
>
>
>
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2015 10:38 AM, "lee worden" <wonder(a)riseup.net>
wrote:
>>>
>>> "point person"?
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2015 10:27 AM, joseph liesner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> overseer; host; ITGT (if Then go To)
>>>> joe
>>>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 10:13 AM, niki wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to honor the request from some Omni community members that
we replace the word bottom-liner.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we collect a list of alternatives and mutually agree to
attempt to replace this phrase / to lovingly and compassionately correct
one another if and when we slip up?
>>>>>
>>>>> As little as it may seem, this will require a cultural shift for a
lot of us that I'm sure we're all willing to make, but it'll likely
take a
bit of time before it collectively takes root.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be great if those who take particular issue with this
phrase could put forth their suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will collect suggestions and make a poll both online and in the
real world.
>>>>
>>>> Here are some suggestions of mine:
>>>>
>>>> * steward
>>>> * curator
>>>> * representative
>>>>
>>>> Love,
>>>>
>>>> N
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> discuss mailing list
>>>> discuss(a)lists.omnicommons.org
>>>> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss(a)lists.omnicommons.org
>> https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
> https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss