So, in the spirit of full disclosure, I'm on
record as being very
skeptical about the feasibility of the Omni, so speaking from that
perspective, I think that working on some combination of renters for the
third office is a really excellent idea. It takes steps toward the creation
of a broader radical common and, as Matt points out, it really does lay the
groundwork for the kind of financial and organizing coordination that the
Omni or any other larger collective project would need. I don't want to be
a skeptical downer over here, because I really do hope that the Omni comes
to fruition, but I nonetheless think it's important to focus on creating a
resilient organizational and financial infrastructure that, even if the
Omni falls through, will still allow us to move forward on these kinds of
projects. Drawing other groups into the space we have in the here and now
seems like a good, concrete step towards that sort of work.
MN
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Matthew Senate <mattsenate(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hey all,
Excited to discuss tonight, hope you can make it.
Appreciate the feedback from everyone, wanted to share a few thoughts.
1. On The Dangers of 2141 Broadway - as far as I see it, we're here,
and it's going to take quite a bit of energy to confirm an alternative with
the right critical mass of folks. To rent out an extra room is equivalent
to saying "We haven't signed a lease on an alternative for this January,
let's put our stuff and ourselves some place for now, especially if we
don't have any space at all". With a month-to-month contract, I shared my
reasons in the first email about why I think it's valuable to do this. In
fact, we're lucky to have the option at this time.
2. On Fund-Raising - I do think there will be some way to
intelligently combine the budgets of a small number of groups to share the
third office. Knowing just a few interested parties should get the ball
rolling. If we're building up to make serious financial commitments
together, I see this as pretty close to the minimum in terms of financial
commitments, a first step. By all of this I also mean that I don't think
the cost will be prohibitive to raising more funds, given the
back-of-the-envelope estimations for alternative spaces so far.
3. On The Office - I believe splitting the room about ~18 ways would
be possible. On the other hand, I think there is likely a better set of
chunks than even division. To give more detail, I think we could probably
do something more like:
1. Some significant portion of the space is rented by one or two
groups, up to say a third or a half. ($300 - $400 / mo)
2. Some shared desk space is available for folks that need an
office space (3 x $50 / mo)
3. Some storage space is available for folks that need storage
only, or storage along with room usage. (3 x $50 / mo)
4. A few more desks are rented and managed as a co-working
component, say as "sudo work" or whatever, that I am interested in
coordinating. (6 x $50 / mo)
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Max B <maxb.personal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is 18 separate groups feasible? Personally, I
might be interested in
paying $50 for a co-working(ish) space for myself and for sudomesh. I
guess I'd be interested in that sort of arrangement in any new Omni-like
situation as well.
Max B
On 12/17/2013 03:12 PM, Matthew Senate wrote:
Hey all,
I have a proposal I'd like some feedback on and to discuss at the next
meeting at the public school this Thursday (7pm right?)
*Proposal: *
Out of the attendees of these meetings (including
folks on the list
below),
to find some number of interested collectives,
individuals,
organizations,
small businesses, etc to rent the $900-$950 / mo.
office adjacent to
the
Bay Area Public School (BAPS), sharing the common
space with BAPS and
the
Sudo Room at 2141 Broadway in Oakland. For
instance, at ~18 equal
parties,
this room can be rented for $50 / mo. I am
personally interested in
coordinating several folks to use part of the space as "sudo coworking"
with a few small desks for individual work. The intention of this
rental is
multiple-fold:
* To no longer delay in solidifying collaboration between various
groups--i.e. for other folks to join BAPS and the Sudo Room by sharing
space now.
* To commit to investing (minimally) financially in a venture that
requires
communication, collaboration, and sharing.
* To engage in a learning experience about our ability to co-operate
and
grow.
* To provide an opportunity to groups that currently do not have a
space to
galvanize their community.
* To be able to fruitfully engage in a comparison between various group
rental options including The Omni, 8th and Alice, and even 2141
Broadway.
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#Timeless_infinite_li…
- * sudo mesh<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#sudo_mesh>
- * Prelinger
Library<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#Prelinger_Library
- * Local Flavor<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#Local_Flavor>
- * Planting
Justice<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#Planting_Justice>
- * Spokeland<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#Spokeland>
- * Fix-It Clinic<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#Fix-It_Clinic>
- * CorpWatch<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#CorpWatch>
- * Sudo Co-Working<
http://space.sudoscience.org/index.php/Possible_Groups#Sudo_Co-Working>
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org