17 Nov
2013
17 Nov
'13
9:41 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:30 PM, David Keenan <dkeenan44(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with batkid - and marc, in spirit - but I
think it IS okay to
accept recurring monies, *we* just have to be prepared to not compromise
on any principles - if this hypothetical/non-hypothetical
grant/donation-giving entity or entities defund us, that's their
prerogative. If they try to influence us, then it's up to refuse their
money at that time, or tell them to f off.
Ok. I think I actually made a mistake in bringing this up at all, since it
totally _is_ hypothetical so we shouldn't worry about it until we have to.
Also, I like your point.
In other words, it's on *us* to keep a grip on our
principles, and not
*let* outside forces unduly influence us...we do this through statements
of principle, bylaws, consensus-based decision-making, etc.
Money is fucking scary. I really feel that way. But let's see if we are
strong enough to control it, rather than the other way around, provided we
one day have enough cash to worry about its sauron-like influences
David
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:44 PM, The Batkid <batkid(a)gmx.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
Would
like to return to the idea that we should be generating other
revenue
streams into the picture of whatever standardized
reporting format we
choose.
The simplest, most efficient, and most rewarding revenue stream is
if members sign up for auto pay of their membership dues.
That's really all there is to it.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss