Nimby ism is about protecting one's property rights by asserting authority in a
locale. It's the ultimate in propertarianism. And, it's all the same. Valuing
property or profit over life is a failure in my opinion. :-)
Have a great day!
Craig
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Not sure what your angle on property rights is, but I
will add that
NIMBYism is about asserting control over other people's property, using
imbalances and inefficiencies in the municipal zoning system.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Craig Rouskey <craigrouskey(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
> Gentrification. It makes me think of that bench on Adeline that says "Do
> something for Oakland or Leave."
>
> To me, doing something for the community - i.e. using our privilege to
> educate and grow community across class, race and other social lines - acts
> as a counterbalance to the gross non-aware/hyper-consumerist gentrification
> that we see disintegrating communities throughout the bay.
>
> I could continue to ramble on (especially about people who tout "property
> rights" then blame SF residents for their property-protective NIMBY
> policies as a way to validate gentrification), but I won't. Not here.
> Instead, I'll suggest that we all acknowledge that we live in a constantly
> growing and changing place whose face changes simply by the amount of money
> thrown at it...really, it's as bad as Liberace. We have these internal
> conversations and the truth is, it's not us. We are not driving
> gentrification. We are all doing what we have to do to stay in the bay
> area. Some of us try to make the communities we exist in better, some of us
> try to suck the life out of them.
>
>
> That is all.
>
> Craig
>
> To quote Janis Joplin "It's all the same fucking day, man."
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Sonja Trauss <sonja.trauss(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
>
>> Yeah some of the non rent downsides of gentrification are worth
>> enumerating because they are way more in our control. Here is the list I
>> have experienced:
>>
>> Reduced neighborhood tolerance for semi-legitamate venues that have
>> concerts and parties
>> Increased enforcement of BS code violations like, "no working on your car
>> in the street"
>>
>> Now you go, those are the only 2 I can think of.
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 13, 2014, Tony Barreca <tony.barreca(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> With all respect, Oren, limiting a discussion of gentrification to rent
>>> levels strikes me as a bit reductionist. It a gnarly, complex problem,
>>> seems to me, and rather the antithesis of taking the "...thread to a
more
>>> encompassing awareness..." I.e., seems less encompassing, and
considerably
>>> so.
>>>
>>> Whether or not it's appropriate for this list I'll leave for others
to
>>> decide, but I do have $0.02 to contribute on that point: I've seen lots
of
>>> other discussions over the past 2 years on this that were at least as
>>> inappropriate, if not more so.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Marina Kukso
<marina.kukso(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
>>>
>>>> is this discussion appropriate to this list?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> would be a great discussion for
>>>>
http://oaklandwiki.org/What_should_we_do_about_gentrification%3Fand/or
>>>>
http://oaklandwiki.org/gentrification
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Hol Gaskill <hol(a)gaskill.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> i think talking about stemming price inflation altogether inevitably
>>>>> redirects to monetary policy
>>>>>
>>>>> couldn't find consistent info on "anti-fnord". why
don't you fill us
>>>>> in?
>>>>>
>>>>> on May 13, 2014, Sonja Trauss <sonja.trauss(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >Make sure Oakland builds fast enough to absorb new arrivals.
>>On
>>>>> Tuesday, May 13, 2014, Oren Beck <orenbeck(a)gmail.com>
wrote:>>There's
>>>>> a set of presumptions that can inherently defy our best efforts at
>>>>> redirection>even when we can offer concrete factual refutations.
>>
>>>>> I unhesitatingly use the phrase "Breaking Set&Setting"
as a most apt
>>>>> one, Call it>an "Anti-Fnord! so to speak... Do look up the
ancestry of the
>>>>> terms if they're not>old friends:)> >
>>>>> Summary- We've a set and setting that demands inflation of rents
as
>>>>> if it were desirable,>or even mandatory. the end result is
inevitable yet
>>>>> NOT mandatory. Can we discuss>strategies to fix the Rent Problem?
>
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >>Oren Beck>>816.632.3695
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>_______________________________________________>sudo-discuss mailing
>>>>> list>sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org>
>>>>>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>>>>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>>>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tony Barreca
>>> LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/tonybarreca
>>> Skype: tonybarreca
>>> Twitter: tbarreca
>>> Mobile: (510) 710-5864
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Craig Rouskey, MSc
> Medical Microbiologist and Immunologist
> (510) 407-6775
> craigrouskey(a)gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>