Re: [sudo-discuss] [OMNI] Proposals up for consensus:

i personally wouldn't block this, but i think if we move toward a 2/3 majority, the larger collectives should get additional delegates. also - has jesse provided an invoice for his work so far? seems like we should see the invoice before agreeing to pay, as a matter of professional services protocol and recordkeeping. On 2014-07-22 05:12, Marc Juul wrote: On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Jenny Ryan <tunabananas(a)gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Jenny! 3. Revision to Consensus Process: Thus far, the Omni Collective has made decisions using a full consensus model. The proposal on the table is for votes to strive for full consensus, but resort to a 2/3 majority vote if consensus cannot be achieved. This model was recommended by Jesse, who has extensive experience representing coops and collectives who've run into problems with full-consensus models for hairy decisions like banning an abusive individual or - as may be the case with us - removing particular groups/collectives from the larger collective. I am blocking this one. We can implement different voting models for specific types of decisions similar to what sudo has. Revoking consensus completely is a lazy solution (and yes, this suggestion is equivalent to revoking consensus as the decision-making process). -- marc/juul _______________________________________________ sudo-discuss mailing list sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss [1]