18 Oct
2016
18 Oct
'16
3:47 p.m.
I don't think Sudo buying half of the building is good idea. Some Sudo
members already feel they have higher power now in this building and their
are not welcoming to other people. If they own half of the Omni they will
have more power to reject or kick out another collective.
The mission statement of the Omni Commons will change. Please look for a
different options.
Thank you,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Lesley Bell <zvezdalune(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Alice, in theory it's a good solution, but for the
amount of money being
contributed, it has to be a well-established, existing nonprofit.
Not sure about the land trust, though.
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016, 9:32 AM beehappysolutions <
beehappysolutions(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Almaz Yihdego, MPA
www.globalcommunicationservices.org
I’ve seen a sign on telegraph ave southbound of
the 24 frwy over pass
that says something like “east bay community sharing” and I had the idea -
If they are a registered 501c3 why not buy a nonprofit for the purchase
of the Omni building - I think all you would have to do is change the names
of the officers.
I apologize if this is a stupid idea
and I apologized for not getting to Wednesdays sudo meeting - but family
happens
with love
Alice
_______________________________________________
consensus mailing list
consensus(a)lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/consensus
On Oct 13, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Yardena Cohen
<yardenack(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What if Omni shares ownership with Bay Area Community Land Trust? Last
year the fundraising wg was leaning towards schemes like where BACLT
owns the land and Omni owns the building. BACLT is a 501c3 and the
kind of property stewardship we're assigning to "Omni2" is already
their core mission.
I'm sorry to say, I don't think power balance issues can ever be
eradicated while Sudo owns half the building. One of the most
important powers at Omni is the power to reject or kick out another
collective. Not that I foresee anybody actually kicking out Sudo, but
over the past few years, Sudoroom has exercised its blocking power to
prevent several new groups from joining or remaining in Omni (Creative
Empowerment Project, Oakland Nights Live), and to prevent other Omni
groups from making important operating decisions which affected their
status - such as Buried Seeds decreasing their rent, Homes Not Jails
being a member collective without paying rent, Black Hole using the
basement, Backspace's various plans, etc. Who would be able to hold
Sudoroom to similar standards it's held for other groups? It's not
about whether we trust each other. If you have to say "trust me" then
you don't just have a "perceived power imbalance", you have a real
one.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss