Hey all,
I appreciate everyone's time and energy, all of the BAPS publians including
David Keenan, sudoers especially and namely Jordan, among many others, and
all other Omni-nomers.
However, I will state my resistance flat-out.
I am unconvinced the current group of The Omni Collective will be able to
pay the necessary rent each month, including that there is enough and
sufficient types of space for each member of the collective. I have not
seen any concrete information presented to sudo room to build my confidence
in this regard.
Also, I do not see any type of formal proposal from The Omni Collective
(passed through our representative) to the general sudo room membership
meeting. I don't feel like we are engaged in consensus-building across the
member collectives, but rather, a pressure campaign to move forward without
(what are to me) the baseline, dead-simple, plain-stated elements of any
new agreement. I don't know why we are discussing prospective, aggressive
move-in dates when we don't have bearing on the actual agreement we may be
engaging in.
I need answers to the following questions and do not think we should move
forward with The Omni without them:
- What are the terms of the lease (i.e. the full contract)?
- Includes lease length (2 years, 3 years?) and terms of dissolution.
- Landlord in or out?
- Rent-to-own option or not?
- What are the terms of space usage?
- Who moves where?
- Which areas are exclusive (private) or inclusive (common)?
- What is the protocol for conflicts and concerns between (or across
members of) Omni Oakland sub-collectives?
- Additionally, what rights and responsibilities do members of the
public (or as I usually say for sudo, which I think applies here,
"prospective members" of any of our collectives) have?
- Can one be affiliated and pursue membership rights and
responsibilities in the space without being a member of an existing
collective or pursuing a new collective to add to the Omni Oakland body?
- Note: this is of immediate importance, not hypothetical, regarding
existing individuals interested in The Omni without any collective
affiliation.
- Do the member collectives' pledges of payment hold water?
- For existing member collectives can we start collecting rent
contributions immediately (to be paid forward to rent after any
agreed-upon
contract is signed)?
- Note: this also focuses on building capital for the existence of an
Omni Collective regardless of location. It's also a typical hackerspace
pattern, though one sudo room did not quite manage for a slurry of
interesting reasons.
Note: Any responses are encouraged to be creative. Perhaps you could argue
that some of these questions can be answered by an after-move-in process,
and if you outline and suggest such a process, I would love to hear and
ponder it.
Ultimately, we need to engage with the very wide sudo room community to
build consensus on our future, not just The Omni's future. Without the
information above, I don't believe we will be able to sustain collectivism
and the process of building shared vision, the precursors and
real-time-generators to a thriving community.
Finally, I am making such strong statements because the suggestion of this
aggressive timeframe also affects sudo room's ability to move out of our
current space in the mean time. If June move-in for The Omni becomes a pipe
dream, we could have gone elsewhere in the meantime before eventually
moving into The Omni, say, September (for instance).
// Matt
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Maximilian Klein <isalix(a)gmail.com> wrote:
*vibey fingers* for Omni. Yar, you have been an
amazing delegate and let
this serve as a renewal of my confidence and consent.
El 13/04/2014 08:23, "Hol Gaskill" <hol(a)gaskill.com> escribió:
nice - we are basically there! phil i think having a more longterm spot
with better access and a critical mass of humans
would increase membership.
we started with a cubby at techliminal, then moved to a closet and
fishbowl at 2135 broadway with intermittent use of a conference table. now
we are in a ~25x40' room with a large common area. there has been some
synergy with BAPS which i think is undeniable and has boosted membership
and activity for both organizations. combining more groups would bring us
up on the radar of even more people who would want to support our various
causes. assuming other groups keep up their end of the arrangement, we
should be able to sustain our end of the responsibilities. the more we
offer, the more people become interested. if you build it, they will come.
that's alot said in the declarative but i believe it all to be true.
on Apr 12, 2014, Yar <yardenack(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Hol Gaskill
<hol(a)gaskill.com> wrote:
> can you break down the costs for us? i followed the link to the wiki
but
didn't
> see it. I remember $2k/month as one number
being thrown around for sudo
> room's share. Right now we are right around $1.5k/mo on gittip which
does
not cover
our current operating expenses. that said i'm sure membership
would skyrocket at the omni. can you summarize the numbers for us here?
Sudo has pledged $2k/month. Keep in mind that unlike our current
lease, this amount covers all expenses from rent to utilities to
general maintenance, etc, which the Omni Collective will be
responsible for. Our total monthly expenses are already close to that:
$1,704.25 December
$1,721.58 January
$1,756.53 February
$1,710.50 March
$1,888.90 April
I think the extra expense will be a no-brainer, will pay for itself,
and will actually be a far better deal than what we're getting now for
our money. :)
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss