23 Jan
2016
23 Jan
'16
12:55 p.m.
~~consensus decision making~~
I'd give one to Yar
On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 12:53 -0800, Adam wrote:
To whom should keys be given? How does one define a
trustworthy
member?
I mean I trust Jake, Robb, et al but whom else?
At RIT's hackerspace we gave key cards to the people who were
responsible
for fixing the broken ship.
On 23 Jan 2016 10:51 am, "Torrie Fischer" <tdfischer(a)hackerbots.net>
wrote:
> Notes are cool and all but they don't work too well if people just
> ignore them.
>
> Folks seem to already be ignoring this mailing list and other
> cultural
> forces that request the door be kept close.
>
> I'm in favor of rekeying the lock and making sure that whoever
> gives
> out the new keys has a stern conversation with keyholders about
> this
> sort of thing.
>
> On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 09:53 -0800, danarauz(a)gmail.com wrote:
> > Oh Door:
> >
> > Many times I have seen the door ajar, mostly at night, and when I
> > have
> > tried to closed it some folks standing outside, usually smoking,
> > had
> > ask me
> > to leave it like that.
> >
> > On the other hand, when events are taking place I have noticed
> > that
> > the
> > door its intentionally kept open to guide the newcomers that it
> > is
> > the
> > entrance and they don't have to bother by ringing the bell, etc.
> >
> > I don't have the solution to the whole door issue, but at least,
> > I
> > suggest,
> > we should have a note in the inside stating to keep it closed at
> > all
> > times,
> > of course, with exceptions when events are taking place.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Torrie Fischer <
> > tdfischer(a)hackerbots.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thats a solution, though I've seen that sort of thing defeated
> > > with
> > > people just wedging the door open or something.
> > >
> > > Not to say that doing that is a fruitless endeavor but it can't
> > > be
> > > the
> > > only thing done.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 03:24 -0800, Charley Sheets wrote:
> > > > While I agree that re-keying may be necessary, and
> > > > restricting
> > > > key
> > > > distribution is prudent, I wonder if it might also be useful
> > > > to
> > > > investigate different door hardware. It seems unintuitive to
> > > > me
> > > > that
> > > > it
> > > > would always be necessary to re-lock the door after unlocking
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > I would imagine there must be door hardware that allows for
> > > > only
> > > > a
> > > > momentary unlocking action, eliminating the need to re-lock
> > > > the
> > > > door.
> > > > Has anything like that been investigated? Is there some
> > > > nuance of
> > > > doors
> > > > that I'm just not understanding?
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > > > sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
> > > > https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discuss mailing list
> > > discuss(a)lists.omnicommons.org
> > > https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
> https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>