~~consensus decision making~~
I'd give one to Yar
On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 12:53 -0800, Adam wrote:
To whom should keys be given? How does one define a
I mean I trust Jake, Robb, et al but whom else?
At RIT's hackerspace we gave key cards to the people who were
for fixing the broken ship.
On 23 Jan 2016 10:51 am, "Torrie Fischer" <tdfischer(a)hackerbots.net>
> Notes are cool and all but they don't work too well if people just
> ignore them.
> Folks seem to already be ignoring this mailing list and other
> forces that request the door be kept close.
> I'm in favor of rekeying the lock and making sure that whoever
> out the new keys has a stern conversation with keyholders about
> sort of thing.
> On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 09:53 -0800, danarauz(a)gmail.com wrote:
> > Oh Door:
> > Many times I have seen the door ajar, mostly at night, and when I
> > have
> > tried to closed it some folks standing outside, usually smoking,
> > had
> > ask me
> > to leave it like that.
> > On the other hand, when events are taking place I have noticed
> > that
> > the
> > door its intentionally kept open to guide the newcomers that it
> > is
> > the
> > entrance and they don't have to bother by ringing the bell, etc.
> > I don't have the solution to the whole door issue, but at least,
> > I
> > suggest,
> > we should have a note in the inside stating to keep it closed at
> > all
> > times,
> > of course, with exceptions when events are taking place.
> > --
> > Daniel
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Torrie Fischer <
> > tdfischer(a)hackerbots.net>
> > wrote:
> > > Thats a solution, though I've seen that sort of thing defeated
> > > with
> > > people just wedging the door open or something.
> > >
> > > Not to say that doing that is a fruitless endeavor but it can't
> > > be
> > > the
> > > only thing done.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 03:24 -0800, Charley Sheets wrote:
> > > > While I agree that re-keying may be necessary, and
> > > > restricting
> > > > key
> > > > distribution is prudent, I wonder if it might also be useful
> > > > to
> > > > investigate different door hardware. It seems unintuitive to
> > > > me
> > > > that
> > > > it
> > > > would always be necessary to re-lock the door after unlocking
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > I would imagine there must be door hardware that allows for
> > > > only
> > > > a
> > > > momentary unlocking action, eliminating the need to re-lock
> > > > the
> > > > door.
> > > > Has anything like that been investigated? Is there some
> > > > nuance of
> > > > doors
> > > > that I'm just not understanding?
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > sudo-discuss mailing list
> > > > sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
> > > > https://sudoroom.org/lists/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discuss mailing list
> > > discuss(a)lists.omnicommons.org
> > > https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> > >
> sudo-discuss mailing list