I would like to know who said that, Ryan, so that we can have a
conversation with them about their attitude.
Laura
On 4/19/15 8:09 PM, Ryan wrote:
The consistent reaction I've gotten from the
community at large is "We
don't actually care about people with chemical sensitivities and would
actively block any attempts to make the space more accessible to those
with respiratory problems who are 'asking too much.'"
So, it might be best to be honest with her, rather than pretend like
the Omni is actually going to actively work to be accessible.
Sorry if this sounds pessimistic, but eh.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 8:06 PM, niki <niki.shelley(a)gmail.com
<mailto:niki.shelley@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello friends,
Someone came in today who was very concerned with our efforts to
make our space truly accessible - she was particularly concerned
with building improvements and the impact on those with chemical
sensitivities. She was also concerned with the sound system at
today's event as there were some issues w/it that made it
difficult for people to hear.
She asked us to not use any materials that will inhibit those with
chemical sensitivities from accessing the space and to create
communication around our accessibility and needs.
She asked to see our plan for how we will do this. We don't have
this scoped out currently and I'm wondering if someone would be
willing to take on the task of researching this issue and making
recommendations to the building Working Group as well as drawing
up a basic outline for providing greater accessibility.
Can someone volunteer for this?
xo
N
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss(a)lists.omnicommons.org <mailto:discuss@lists.omnicommons.org>
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
building mailing list
building(a)lists.omnicommons.org
https://omnicommons.org/lists/listinfo/building