Yea we should measure SUDO's upstream bandwidth..for running
server VMs off of desktops (or laptops would best), maybe we could cobble
together an ad-hoc cluster.. and somehow keep it safely
force-fielded within the chiral chaos of hack that is our main SUDO space?
I don't think we'd want actual rackable servers form-factor-wise though (1U
etc) due to room temp/noise issues :)
-d
On Friday, September 20, 2013, Gregg Horton wrote:
I would be into having a sudo server rack if we could
host things
On Sep 19, 2013 11:55 PM, "David Keenan"
<dkeenan44@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'dkeenan44(a)gmail.com');>>
wrote:
> Perfect. Thanks Mark!!
>
> On Thursday, September 19, 2013, mark burdett wrote:
>
>> Hi, I could recommend
https://iocoop.org (though I wouldn't say it
>> directly aligns w/
Riseup.net, it's a bit more generic in its mission)
>>
>> Disclaimer, I'm on the board, but we're a volunteer-run cooperative
>> so... :)
>>
>> --mark B.
>> On Sep 19, 2013 11:15 PM, "David Keenan" <dkeenan44(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> Recommendations for a reputable host / colo for the forthcoming Bay
>>> Area Public School site reboot?
>>>
>>> Ideally a host with ethics that align with a place like Riseup, but is
>>> on the west coast, preferably the Bay Area.. unless that is some kind of
>>> crazy dream?
>>>
>>> Do we / sudo have the upstream bandwidth to host simple sites (basic
>>> WP) from 2141? I can set it all up.. Where does SUDO host our main site,
>>> wiki etc?
>>>
>>> Sorry if these are noob-y questions - any guidance appreciated - thx!
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org');>
>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
>