Hey does anyone have a plasma globe toy or any other kind of portable
plasma form factor thingy I could borrow?
--
Best Regards,
Cere Davis
ceremona(a)gmail.com
http://AcoustoCurio.us
-------------------
GPG Key: http://taffy.findpage.com/~cere/pubkey.asc
GPG fingerprint (ID# 73FCA9E6) : F5C7 627B ECBE C735 117B 2278 9A95 4C88
73FC A9E6
thought i would ask here first
need a starter battery for a car that has not been moved for years; a
battery for one of the first, silver macbookpros (the kind with the silver
keys and the square battery), and if anyone has a spare regular ol' battery
charger for regular ol' rechargeable batteries, that would rock, as mine
appears to have paid the ultimate price.
--
*Be seeing you.*
Have any artists here officially open sourced their art ? Here Ramsey Arnaoot did:: I know we have open sourced art on our Sudoroom Github ..
http://www.pifas.net/main/alumnus/5
Sent from my iPhone
Recorded for posterity at:
https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2015-09-16
*Sudo Room Meeting 16 Sep 2015*
=Intros=
* Icebreaker: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could
chuck wood?
* Patrick Xu: 2
* Robb: As much as he had time to chuck
* David Estrada: It's bodyweight, conservative estimate
* Sigma: Depends on how much meth they've had
* Romy: Why are woodchucks chucking wood to begin with, and why do they
necessarily have to chuck wood at all? Is this an intelligence test? Am I
part of an invisible algorithm, where my answers are being evaluated to
avoid being thrown to the bottom of the pile?
* rmt_daniel: Chuck is the diminutive of Charles. Save the trees. :)
* Matt: One food not bombs truck-full and three space pods full, as that's
how much wood this chuck and his chuck-friends have chucked today.
* yar: the only way to find out is through a massive controlled study of
woodchuck wood chucking
* jenny: doesn't matter to me as long as the damn woodchuck is happy
* juul: Even if a woodchuck could chuck wood and even if a woodchuck would
chuck wood, should a woodchuck chuck wood?
=Announcements=
* sudo-humans is borked, specifically that important part where you sign up
to pay dues
** What is the exact issue? Can you describe it, provide a screenshot, or a
url? For how long now has this issue occurred? Any other information?
** Waiting for information
*** jenny: don't know where the logs are. log in, go to your profile, then
click edit -> edit recurring payment. blank page. mewp. juul & cap'n morgan
are looking into it
* Rent party on Saturday
** You should come, you should help - Sat 9/19 @ 10am - 8pm
https://omnicommons.org/rentparty
** Matt will sell his heart out over anything you identify (and remove from
sudo room!) as "rummage"!!!!!!111
** Need to raise $5000 before the end of the month
=Finances=
* Paid October rent early to help buffer Omni's waning bank account.
* Will need to pay imminently: $400 501c3 application filing fee, roughly
$350 in shared utilities for September
* After October rent, we currently have $976.49 in our account + $211.54 in
Paypal/Gratipayments that's currently in transit to our account = $1,188.03
* Mid-August to Mid-September income:
** $1,064 in PayPal donations, weekly Gratipay payouts dwindling from $412
(Aug 20) to $130 (Sep 10). Some members also pay their dues through PayPal.
** Is due to not a full 30 days?
** $2,215 in Stripe donations, with a $1K abberant one-time donation =
~$1,215 coming in monthly from Stripe. Let's try to get more people using
sudo-humans and aim for $2K as the next milestone!
*** Currently 29 members are signed up for recurring donations via
sudo-humans, though there are 51 members in the system.
** Total income during this period (15 Aug - 16 Sep) - $3,279 but $2,279 in
regular donations so not quite breaking even atm
=New Members=
* New Member Script: https://sudoroom.org/wiki/New_Member_Script
=== david ===
* David would like to become a new member:
** Been here a few days, working on javascript
** Like it here
** How did you find: Heard from a friend. Noisebridge also came up.
** Why: Excited about javascript community, and the makerspace community.
Hardware
** Learn: More javascript
** Teach: More javascript
** Plan to abolish (10w): Abolish the world, nuke the world.
** End planet troubles (10w): See previous answer
** Plan to ensure freedom(10w): Open source annihilation, everything is
open source.
** Know about sudo?: Subscribe to hacker ethics, all that jazz, everything
open, open firewalls. Likes #6 alot.
** Know about history?: Heard only been around for about a year.
*** correct answer is 4 :) maybe should write a history page..
** Know about SOS?: Reading
** Know about Safe space?: Also reading
** Been banned?: No
** Cop/etc/cat: No, no, no, not decided on status of cat.
** Happy: Getting in the zone, flow states, whatever gets me in the moment.
** 20+3: 23
** Captcha?: I have no idea
* Robb: I like NB encourages bribes.i was joking,
* Matt: Know a place where you have to farm for hours before becoming
possible member. (serfdom?)
* rmt_daniel: sefdom, new word for me (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom
).
* jenny: erm, 'nuke the world'?
** yar: at least it's slightly better than the 'nuke the middle east'
people. but still. 'throw up your hands' at best, 'white supremacy is human
nature' at worst.
==Pondering==
* 9/2 - 9/30: Benji
* 8/25 - 9/23: Brendan - pondering ends next week
= Proposals =
* Quorum is unlocked/supercharged
==Liberation Ministries revised proposal for 'active non-member
participation'==
* Full proposal:
https://omnicommons.org/pipermail/consensus/2015-September/000638.html
** https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCTmZqcEV2F8mRiIO1eLbzQ
* what is the longest trial period Sudoroom can consense on? 1 month? 3
months?
** yar: 2-3 months kind of sucks because it puts them in limbo right around
christmas and new years which is a season they are probably doing more work
than usual. Oct 1 - Feb 1 might make more sense. +1 good point
** Patrick: Would give them a powerful opportunity to shine going through
the Christmas season.
** Matt: Everyone of the folks who shared a contention isn't here, except
Robb.
*** Sigma: Your point is factually false, lists names of some people here
*** Matt: I concede the point, there are people here who have shared
concerns, forgot about a few, sorry
** Robb: Most of my concerns were just clarifying statements on how
different than the others of the collective (sorry missed most of this Robb)
** Patrick: Want to speak to the kinds of objections: Going through notes
about objections to spirituality, religion, especially Christianity.
Objections are to brainwashy/pyramid-scheme style religions like mormonism,
jehovahs witnesses, which I agree with, manipulative patriarchal bullshit
is bad. But recognize spirtuality is very diverse, and has been a principle
component of social justice movements. Examples: Gandhi, MLK, Malcolm X are
old school examples. Zapatistas are a contemporary example of a movement
toward autonomy based on traditional mayan culture and religion, a case in
point where anarchism and spirituality dovetail together. Objections are
straw-man objections, so we should do trial period. There are valid
objections, but there are big reasons to build these kinds of bridges.
** yar: if these people were anything like mormons, they'd already have a
place. a big fancy modern place. also gandhi & mlk weren't anarchists...
but anyway
** matt: Patrick is contending that many of the arguments by sudoers (on
email and meeting notes) against working with Liberation Ministries are (at
least in part) drawing that comparison, which ultimately seems misguided.
** Matt: Agree with Patrick, unfortunate that people on each side
(supporting, or questioning) are seeing only distorted images of this
eachother instead of the actual depth/complexity at hand here. This is why
I am in pain, and why I have recused myself.
*** yar will not be able to go to the delegates meeting tomorrow. matt, if
sudoroom can consent to a trial period or abstain, are you willing to be a
delegate then?
** yar: this is why a trial period is so important IMO. february will be
here before we even know it. +1+1 Trial period! Woot woot!
** Romy: Uncomfortable going from 0 to 1 year. Trial period might be fine,
we do that with our members.
** Matt: It seems like there might be a a dynamic between Cheryl and her
ministry, where something they do in an event is perhaps a gesture of where
their congregation is going to put their major energy. There hasn't been
any effort so far in this space, and can't wrap my head around why that is.
Maybe someone an omni person is advising that, maybe Cheryl's board, but
unclear.
*** Patrick: Inside their current proposal directly says they plan to be
part of the Omni no matter what, even if there is no agreement.
*** Sigma: Why haven't they done this already, in the current month since
this got proposed? Seems like a red flag.
*** Pat: direct response, peoples lives are crazy complicated, surviving in
capitalism is hard. There may be good reason they haven't been able to
devote time to hanging out in Omni without some formal commitment (long or
short)
*** Matt: Maybe a reason maybe not, maybe due to miscommunication that
Cheryl believed she had to be a member in order to do stuff. Was clarified
directly about a month ago.
****
https://omnicommons.org/wiki/Event:2015/08/27_Delegates_Meeting#Liberation_…
**** yar: they asked permission first because that's what our website told
them to do. and the reaction after this made them very skeptical about
investing more time, energy & money if the omni community is going to
reject them in the end.
*** Sigma: listened to one of Cheryl's sermons and has an explicit
objection to bringing in a christian organization that uses the bible and
substantially supports things in the bible, unless things in there are
specifically denied and crossed out, there are a plethora of bigoted,
hateful, mysogynistic statements in the bible, an organization that uses
this text and promotes it unquestioningly is a system of oppression. THey
need to go the extra mile to show that they do not subscribe to the hateful
parts of the bible.
**** yar: they said they're aligned with everything in Omni's statement of
solidarity!!! that is a thousand extra miles.
*** Pat: So maybe we could formulate that question, "What is LM's
relationship with the text of the bible, in detail?" And can we ask that
question and explore it through a ~4 month trial period?
**** yar: that is why we have a trial period. the answer is nuanced and we
can learn this over time.
*** yar: their practice is dependent on what people in their community
need, it's not predetermined at all. these are not dogmatists, it's people
who want to build community, infrastructure for mutual aid, and singing and
dancing while doing it. feels like i'm talking to brick walls here.
*** Sigma: Not at a point where I would block now, as the combination of
support of a trial period and the non-member status makes LM's explicit
bible support less tied to the values of the Omni.
** Matt: Thing in America where precident's matter, so it doesn't matter
that law is established by judges, etc, but we shouldn't get trapped in the
mindset where because we did it previously we should we do it this way. For
ex, wasn't GWS founders who showed up, it was a chapter. We did explicitly
scrutinized what they do, what they needed. They were excited to be working
with other collectives. Several other collectives engaged in a trial period
instead of forming a long-term committment at first.
** Sigma: Seems different as a christian church comes from a history of
exploitation and oppression, so the default position is rejection and needs
work to establish that it doesn't embody those patterns of history
*** yar: they do. have you read the notes? these are our people. they are
on our side.
*** Matt: Agree with that, have talked about trauma as a default reaction.
** Max: There are many people here whose default reaction is "organized
religion: no" and subsequently maybe this isn't the best place for LM
*** yar: I am not ceding Omni to anti-religious bigots. I am simply not. I
do not accept this argument. +1
** Max: Maybe this isn't the space for LM, maybe they should just have a
landlord. [who is saying this?] (his name is max)
*** maybe this isn't the space for you
** Mary ward (walks in, stage right!): They are soliciting us for space,
they explicitly want to be here.
** Robb: They want year lease, do other collectives do a year lease?
*** Matt: No, it's different because the collectives can decide their own
fate (didn't understand this exactly, feel free to fill in with more
details)
*** yar: we are hoping to offer them a trial period. that is what's up for
consensus right now.
** Romy: Is the logic of a lease they are just forming their ministry?
*** Matt: Yeah
*** Robb: She's indicated once the ball is rolling she wants to keep it
rolling in the same space
** Romy: 300 seems like such a low number for this space
*** yar: this is not what's up for consensus right now. it's derailing the
conversation. we are talking about a trial period. we can figure out the
rest later.
*** Patrick: Optik Illusions (sp?) is at 100
*** yar: we are an anti-capitalist space which charges based on need and
ability, not market value
** Matt: It's complex because it's common space, like we have a computer
there that they shouldn't move, in terms of Opti Allusions
** Matt: It also blocks off Sunday mornings so no other activities are
possible
*** yar: in the past year, only a handful of things happened on Sunday
mornings. this may change eventually but probalby not much before February
1, which is the only period under consideration right now
** Robb: True for OI on friday
** Matt: Complex topic, many objections, many emotional responses.
** Patrick: Do we have consensus on trial period?
** Mary: It's really about the space, not used on Sunday
** Matt: Not true, data on the used space was incorrect, frustrated. Each
side is not trying to understand all the issues, just pushing their
perspective.
*** yar: Ben's report from Commons WG was incorrect? Please can you back
this up? Ben was a neutral third party in this, and this is new information
for me, so it's not fair to use this as an example of me "not trying to
understand"
**** jenny: somewhat incorrect. as someone who stewarded a lot of events,
many weekend events had early setup times or would come back the next day
to finish cleaning. didn't account for the BACH unconference or the Free
Marissa Caravan report-back, which maybe weren't listed properly on the
calendar, just two events off the top of my head that I recall using the
ballroom Sunday am. Also, our event requests are only increasing and we're
likely to book more weekend-long events once we have our permits sorted.
Just some points of info, I thought his report was otherwise fairly
accurate.
***** +1, on top of that it's an infinite cycle
** Romy: Don't have bad feelings on this, necessarily complex topic.
** Sigma: Open question, given Omni slowness on making decisions, and given
previous issues with La Commune lease termination, how would this trial
period end? What happens if there are problems but not consensus on further
inclusion? How would a problematic assocation be terminated?
** Romy: I don't understand why they didn't take the time to come here and
get to know us?
*** yar: see above. they followed the instructions on our website.
**** Sigma: These were clarified about a month ago, nothing has happened
since?
**** yar: at that point they had heard so much deep anti-religious
sentiment that they are clearly reluctant to invest much time without first
getting a commitment from us that we can get past the religion thing
**** Sigma: That interpretation contradicts explicit language in their
proposal which says they will participate even if they aren't given a lease.
**** yar: oh, i see what you're saying. yes it would be nice if people from
LM could participate on a daily basis regardless. but i find myself having
trouble with that lately, even.
*** Mary: maybe miscommunication
*** Matt: Totally agree, don't get it. "Not having services now" seems like
cop-out.
** Sigma: Looks like Patrick is drafting a proposal, requesting explicit
language that without an explicit Omni consensus to extend the trial
period, if the trail period has elapse, their lease is terminated.
Essentially want to avoid ambiguity, like as with happened with La Commune,
and want to make a problematic sitation resolvable.
*** yar: the issue with La Commune was leaving unexpectedly early and
having a dysfunctional internal decisionmaking process due to everybody
leaving, it's so not really comparable
*** Sigma: Wasn't solely based on the La Commune situation, did want to
provide an explicit outcome if their presence is problematic and there
isn't a consensus that they should stay.
** Brendan: If this wasn't a church, would we be doing a trial period?
*** Matt: Yes, this has happened before.
*** Robb: In trial period now.
*** Mary: Yeah and there is substantial scrutiny for each new collective.
*** Pat suggests an Amendment to the LM proposal: Quoting from the new LM
proposal, in the section "Summary": "[LM is] confident that their ability
to collaborate and contribute to the space will manifest, whether they
become a collective member now, later or never."
As someone who is passionate about Inter-faith organizing and building
broad based solidarity around radical values, I echo LM’s confidence that
given a trial period, LM would be able to demonstrate beyond a shadow of a
doubt that they are NOT trying to
brainwash/mind-control/emotionally-manipulate anyone. I am also confident
that if other cultural mismatches were to arise, we would be able to
resolve them. I am also confident that the connection to the warmth of an
intergenerational, interracial, family-oriented membership that LM would
catalyze would convince the skeptical that the benefits of LM's presence
far outweigh the costs. I am overflowingly confident that, as suggested by
Yar at the 8/26 delegates meeting, a trial period of 3 to 6 months would be
more than enough time to build trust between LM and the Omni community,
after which LM could be confirmed as a long term tenant and/or
member-collective.
Most of my friends in the activist community would agree that organizers
should build affinity/trust first before jumping into a long-term
partnership together, it is totally unreasonable and naive to expect
otherwise. As Yar said at the 8/26 sudo meeting, "applying to be a member
collective is like proposing marriage. so take us on a few dates first."
text of amendment:
LM will be a tenant for a trial period of (4 months? Yar proposed Oct 1st
to Feb 1st) in which LM and the wider Omni community can build trust and
affinity with each other. If the Omni community does not reach consensus
to extend the trial period or enter into an official long-term arrangement
with LM, then the trial period will terminate.
** Sigma: For new people arriving, if you are missing context, please read
the notes, because the notes are great, because I'm taking them.
*** Marc: Thanks for taking notes :)
*** rmt_daniel: thx Sigma. I am reading them. Not saying much, but reading.
Thx! :)
** Romy: Feel like everything would be awesome if she came and talked to us
*** Brendan: Maybe she feels anxious because we are like "omg you are an
evil church ruler lady" and if we were actively open about talking to her
then it would go better
* Lesley (remote): I also support 4-6 month trial.+1
** Patrick: Maybe we should have an envoy of people who are not allergic to
religion and want to meet her and talk to her
*** Mary: I am in
*** Brendan: I am in to envoy
*** Pat: Can we get quorum to consense on Sudo requesting an amendment to
the proposal that includes a trial period of 4 months?
===Vote===
Proposal: Liberation Ministries (LM) will be a tenant for a trial period of
4 months, in which LM and the wider Omni community can build trust and
affinity with each other. If the Omni community does not reach consensus
to extend the trial period or enter into an official long-term arrangement
with LM, then the trial period will terminate.
* Aye: Lesley, Yar, Pat, Francisco, Troy, Liz, Max, Mary, Anthony, Robb
* Not Blocking: Sigma, Juul (but not feeling very happy about it), Matthew
Stewart (Think this is a really bad idea), Jenny, rmt_daniel (I agree w
M.Stewart).
* Blocking:
The proposal passes.
==New Omni Delegates==
===PatXu===
* Proposal: Add Patrick to be on delegates list.
** Aye: Jenny, Sigma, Jake, Mary, Lesley, Matt, Romy, Robb, Karissa
** Abstaining: Francisco
** Blocking:
The proposal passes.
===Sigma===
* Proposal: Add Sigma to be on delegates list.
** Aye: Jenny, Jake, Mary, Patrick, Matt, Romy, Robb, Karissa, juul
** Abstaining: Francisco
** Blocking:
The proposal passes.
=Conflicts/Bans=
* Dante C who reportedly spit at Niki was reminded again and issued
interest in attempting to engage in conflict resolution. Has returned to
Omni Commons since then many times, and has been asked to leave on several
occaisions, and needs to engage in conflict resolution, but until then is
not welcome in the space.
=Previously=
* https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2015-09-09
* https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2015-09-02
* https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2015-08-26
--
Jenny
Help open a people-powered common space in Oakland, California!
https://omnicommons.org/donate
`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
"Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
-Laurie Anderson
"Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining it."
-Hannah Arendt
"To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
-Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
Hey Sudo!
Hope you are all well and the Omni is working out the kinks of starting
something new.
I'm writing because Positive News, the newspaper I co-create, is looking
for support in making a program that will bring together 100 positive news
items per day. I've cc:d our editor, Ilonka, on this so please reply all if
you are interested in connecting on this. The first thing we need is to
figure out how to speak about the project on a technical coding level.
Feel free to pass our contact on to other programers/hackers who might be
interested in working with us.
Thanks for making the world better,
Kazoo
* Kazoo Studios * <http://www.etsy.com/shop/kazoostudio>
*Game ends at: 10am Sat, 9/19*
There's only three rules!!!
1. Find *something* in sudo room that almost never gets used.
2. Determine if it's *valuable* to pretty much anyone (or pretty much
anyone who would show up to the *Omni Commons Rent Party*
https://omnicommons.org/rentparty ;)
3. If it's valuable, *guess a price* and give it to me (Matt) to sell at
the rummage sale!
Just follow steps 1 through 3, rinse, repeat, and you'll finally be free of
lice -- I mean free of stuff sudo room doesn't use.
// Matt
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org> wrote:
> that's a good question. So far the offer to have LM do their thing without
> a 1-year commitment has not generated a response that I know of. Have they
> changed their mind or are you attempting to broker this on your own?
>
> Personally I think that we could offer them a month of Sundays to see what
> they're like. Perhaps you can find out if they're interested in that.
>From the 8/27 notes:
https://omnicommons.org/wiki/Event:2015/08/27_Delegates_Meeting
--
yar: would you feel comfortable with a 3 or 6 month trial period?
cheryl: i'd have to go back to my group. having to move after 3 months
would be disruptive. if we build we build, if we grow together we want
to grow together.
--
>From Stephen Novotny's most recent email:
https://omnicommons.org/pipermail/consensus/2015-September/000638.html
"They feel that it’s essential for them to have a space to begin their
work and so they must begin investing their time elsewhere if the Omni
cannot come to at least a preliminary consensus to move forward with
their request for space on Sunday mornings and Friday evenings."
I think "preliminary consensus" means yes, a shorter trial period
would be better than nothing. It would keep them at the table long
enough to continue building a relationship, and if they reject this
offer because it's not a full year, at least we come out looking
reasonable. Even if LM doesn't end up accepting a shorter period, I
think the symbolic weight of the Omni community consenting to this
shorter period would go a long way in mending our community fractures
and keep our community from falling apart.
I also think 2 or 3 months would look a lot better than 1 month, which
is only four services. Would you block 2 months?
