1 Oct
2013
1 Oct
'13
10:38 a.m.
I think we've been fortunate to have people (Eddan, Matt, Zach) put their name down in
the lease and assume a degree of liability for operations. I interpret the notice to
George as a move that is not binding on sudo room in any way, but one that A) allows Eddan
and presumably Matt to relinquish their "doing business as" status to a better
defined group, B) informs George that his behavior toward tenants will not be met with
guaranteed continued tenancy, and C) puts a fire under all of our asses to solve the
space/access/community issues elegantly, either by finding a new space or by coming to an
agreement and a way forward at 2141. These are just my thoughts, with a grain of salt on
specifics as I haven't been going to general meetings recently but I guess it's
time to start doing that again since this is a matter of great importance.
Oct 1, 2013 10:23:41 AM, dkeenan44(a)gmail.com wrote:
Hey Eddan/Marc et al,
terminating the lease.
-- rhodey
On 10/01/2013 07:49 AM, Eddan Katz wrote:
> It was also based on your emphatic veto on
any mitigating solution that
> involved any contact with our landlord in
the last several meetings. As
> well as the decision, trailing back to
three consecutive meetings, where
> it was decided to remove individual names
for the lease.
> My apologies if I misunderstood you, Marc.
I assumed you were being sincere.
> sent from eddan.com http://eddan.com
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Eddan Katz eddan(a)clear.net
> eddan(a)clear.net>> wrote:
>> This was based on the decision made at
the meeting you held, Marc, and
>> based on the message you sent to the
list about what was decided at
>> that meeting.
>
>> sent from eddan.com
http://eddan.com >
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:29 AM, Marc Juul
juul(a)labitat.dk
>> juul(a)labitat.dk>> wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:28 AM,
Eddan Katz eddan(a)clear.net
>>> eddan(a)clear.net>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've given notice to George
& Laurie that we are terminating the
>>> current lease at the end of
December. George said he was
>>> interested in putting up the
Sudo Room section of the building
>>> for co-op sale.
>>
>>
>>> Did sudo room agree to do this or
did you just decide to go out and
>>> do this on your own?
>>
>>> --
>>> Marc
>>
_______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>_______________________________________________
>sudo-discuss mailing list
>sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
This is the comment in the thread which says,
"Lets keep cool heads here guys, we're all on the same side, we all want
whatever's best for sudo, Lets all chill, I'm sure nothing undoable has been
committed.."
If Eddan is immanently concerned about his personal
liability with regards the lease, which is totally understandable, then yea his name on
the lease should ideally be replaced by someone more comfortable with that and the
potential risk it entails.. It seems to me that could/should happen ASAP? As doing
so might help ease some of the tension in the present conversation, too.
BAPS' lease is i think still let to Zach Houston,
which we also need to change stat, so maybe if nothing else both Sudo & Baps could
meet with Laurie & George to change these particulars --
David
On Tuesday, October 1, 2013, rhodey wrote:
If you're referring to the SudoRoom meeting last Wednesday I can say
that having been there myself there was nothing close to consensus on