8 Jan
2015
8 Jan
'15
12:09 p.m.
RAYC is permabanned. It might have been noted in a meeting somewhere around
Dec 16th or so. It was agreed by lower-case-c consensus amongst nthmost,
signal, patrickod, Mitch, myself, and probably others who were present at the
impromptu SSWG discussion.
On Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:55:35 AM hol(a)gaskill.com wrote:
That's what people felt - we needed more time to
establish how he
intends to use the space and interact w/ others. Also discussed was that
really, we should probably take this time for ALL new members instead of
just giving it a week.
Please anyone interested consider proposing amendments to our
membership process:
https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association#Section_2.1.0_Process_for_
becoming_a_member
Here are some notes from noisebridge meetings below, just did a little
digging today
Banned for 6 months - agrees to stay out for that time:
https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_03_11
Comes up for perma-ban, which is blocked:
https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_03_18
Discussion for 2 meetings RE unbanning:
https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_04_22
https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_04_29
Sounds like one of the main people pushing for his ban was also banned
and/or removed from the 'council' but either way, the consensus was that
we will proceed with an open mind and listen to all the facts.
Cheers
On 2015-01-08 11:34, Adam Munich wrote:
From what I've gathered from his discussions
about it there was apparently
some sort of miscommunication between the people running Noisebridge and
electricians, which rayc tried to resolve. The people who were supposed
to be doing the job didn't like that somehow.
Granted that's only his side of the story and I don't know the other side,
but overall rayc has been rather valuable in keeping sudo clean and
organized. I feel like it's worth giving him a chance.
Cheers,
-Adam
On Jan 8, 2015 11:04 AM, <hol(a)gaskill.com> wrote:
It was already blocked by several people due to some concerns - among them
is that he didn't mention the situation RE Noisebridge at all until
prompted, which didn't convey a sense of openness and honesty. I believe
someone is reaching out to him to get more info on the situation so
probably best not to make it the subject of a meeting until there's been
a chance to hear everyone out offline. I left at 10:30 so may have missed
who that was - if it wasn't delegated to anyone I'll contact him.
cheers
On 2015-01-08 10:02, Torrie Fischer wrote:
Hei, sudo room.
I want to avoid as much conflict as possible here on discuss@ so I'll
state up front that I would really rather folks talk to me in person or
off list in response to this.
I had every intention of coming to Sudo last night as I infrequently do to
see whats up and hack on things and spend more time in the space. My knee
disagreed to I went home instead.
Had I made it I would've certainly blocked RAYC's membership.
I plan on showing up at Sudo Room next week to have a legitimate block in
person since phoning it in as I'm doing in this e-mail is bullshit and we
all know that. I would appreciate it a bunch if others were around to
hear me elaborate about my principled objection and give feedback if it
has any standing. I also don't think its all that excellent of an idea to
try and discuss this on a wednesday night when folks want to just get
together and be positive, so I'll certainly be making more of an effort
to be at the space before then for discussion.
Again, I'm not going to respond to this on the list but feel free to poke
me off-list or AFK :)
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss [1]
_______________________________________________ sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss [1]
Links:
------
[1] https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss