21 Feb
2013
21 Feb
'13
1:24 p.m.
Dear All,
I just wanted to confirm that we are indeed still meeting this Friday at
6pm if that still works for everyone. At the moment I'm still trying to get
us access to the Berkeley space that we discussed before for the possible
East Bay DIY Bio hacker space but no word yet. So we have a choice
1. Meet at a Cafe/Bar/Restaurant (possibly Saturn Cafe) in Berkeley at 6pm
2. Alternatively, we could meet back at Sudo room at 6pm just before the
hacker happy hour and talk for a while as people arrive until about
7/7.30pm?
My preference (for simplicity) would probably be Sudo Room
Let me and our fellow Biohacker members know if you have a preference?
Please also see the agenda below compiled by Ron:
1) How to build a self-sustaining community? What sorts of organization,
resources, people, physical requirements would there be to get a space off
the ground?
Who will be in the community and what are their goals?
How might membership work?
What are our self sustaining budget numbers?
How will the lease and other such legal obligations work?
How can we collaborate with biocurious and nextgen? Who can be our allies
to build this momentum?
Other topics related: legal, regulatory, fiscal requirements, organization,
volunteers, building momentum, lab rules
2) Projects.
Everyone loves talking about projects. Given some idea of what the
community needs, how can projects build that community?
Because it takes at least 6 months of focused experience to get up to speed
in actual biological hacking, team projects will probably be the mainstay
of the lab for a while.
Team projects should probably be focused and supported by vote, but how can
we gauge what is too ambitious for a first round?
For example:
- open benchtop*
- the bioprinter project is an experience to learn from
- bio Informatics support for the lab or diyBio
- open source bioreagent design.
3) Appendix: Lessons learned:
- Biologists involved in the core of the startup process have been pretty
useful.
- getting members up to speed can take months and they need mentorship to
get to a level of creative practice.
- projects build enthusiasm as well as get people experience
- classes are important
- the community is made of people all of whom are needed to build the
community successfully (e.g. members, volunteers, class attendees, board
members (or something like board members anyway).
* BTW - This is the gogofuge link I mentioned - really a niceified dremel
centrifuge.
http://diybio.org/2012/06/12/gogofuge/
All the best,
Ryan
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Ron Shigeta <rtshigeta(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey everyone,
Really enjoyed seeing everyone in last month!
Since we have decided to talk more about an East Bay DIYBio space... I
thought I'd suggest some structure for the meeting Friday...
If Ryan can swing it, walking through the space and taking it in will help
establish the agenda more firmly, but in the interests of having a focused
discussion I wanted to send out an agenda proposal - please lets change it,
but have something like an agenda for the meet this month?
Feel free to add or hold forth...just want to get the ball rolling.
1) How to build a self-sustaining community? What sorts of organization,
resources, people, physical requirements would there be to get a space off
the ground?
Who will be in the community and what are their goals?
How might membership work?
What are our self sustaining budget numbers?
How will the lease and other such legal obligations work?
How can we collaborate with biocurious and nextgen? Who can be our allies
to build this momentum?
Other topics related: legal, regulatory, fiscal requirements,
organization, volunteers, building momentum, lab rules
2) Projects.
Everyone loves talking about projects. Given some idea of what the
community needs, how can projects build that community?
Because it takes at least 6 months of focused experience to get up to
speed in actual biological hacking, team projects will probably be the
mainstay of the lab for a while.
Team projects should probably be focused and supported by vote, but how
can we gauge what is too ambitious for a first round?
For example:
- open benchtop*
- the bioprinter project is an experience to learn from
- bio Informatics support for the lab or diyBio
- open source bioreagent design.
3) Appendix: Lessons learned:
- Biologists involved in the core of the startup process have been pretty
useful.
- getting members up to speed can take months and they need mentorship to
get to a level of creative practice.
- projects build enthusiasm as well as get people experience
- classes are important
- the community is made of people all of whom are needed to build the
community successfully (e.g. members, volunteers, class attendees, board
members (or something like board members anyway).
* BTW - This is the gogofuge link I mentioned - really a niceified dremel
centrifuge.
http://diybio.org/2012/06/12/gogofuge/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"East Bay DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to east-bay-diybio+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Ryan Bethencourt
Tel: (415) 794 6463
ryan.bethencourt(a)gmail.com
www.bamh1.com
www.linkedin.com/in/bethencourt
www.logos-press.com/books/biotechnology_business_development.php