wow that's a long article! I can't get through it all so I can't really
comment on it. Although I agree with part of your quote that we should
remember that "work" in our society is dehumanizing and replacing humans in
the workflow is just a logical extension of the dystopia we're already in.
I do think in general that Tim O'Reilly was wrong and out of touch for
allowing DARPA to try to join polite society through Maker Faire, and
O'Reilly personally cheered DARPA. While it's not surprising that someone
in his position would be that way, it's objectionable for me and indicates
an important lack of awareness of the danger of global militarism.
I think it's important for people to realize that just because there are
useful side-effects of AI like whatever cool things they've been able to
use it for, doesn't mean that presently its primary task and reason for
existing (the enormous investments being made by the very worst entities in
our society) is for the most evil things you can imagine.
Go ahead and think of the most evil things you can, and then look up
Lavender AI and "Where's Daddy?" which were used by Israel to target
civilians in Gaza.
There are plenty of examples closer to home, being used by Musk to target
democracy and being used by Stephen Miller to target undocumented
Americans, and they are RAPIDLY moving toward using this tech to target
dissidents of any kind.
Talking about AI without acknowledging the existential threat we're facing
right now (slowed only by the incompetence of our attackers) is whistling
past the graveyard.
-jake
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 10:19 AM Peter Mui via sudo-discuss <
sudo-discuss(a)sudoroom.org> wrote:
Maybe Sudo Room could add an AI thought leadership
practice? Or add it as
a component to our existing and emerging programming?
“...The notion that AI is a worker, not a tool, can too easily continue
the devaluation of human agency that has been the hallmark of regimented
work (and for that matter, education, which prepares people for that
regimented work) at least since the industrial revolution. In some sense,
Huang’s comment is a reflection of our culture’s notion of most workers as
components that do what they are told, with only limited agency. It is only
by comparison with this kind of worker that today’s AI can be called a
worker, rather than simply a very advanced tool...”
My old boss Tim O’Reilly on AI as a tool vs. AI as work:
https://www.oreilly.com/radar/jensen-huang-gets-it-wrong/
-Peter
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list -- sudo-discuss(a)sudoroom.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sudo-discuss-leave(a)sudoroom.org
More options at
https://sudoroom.org/lists/postorius/lists/sudo-discuss.sudoroom.org/