18 Apr
2013
18 Apr
'13
4:26 p.m.
Hi All,
In accordance with the action item from yesterday's meeting, Bill and I
have come up with a process for replacing strings in the archive. If you
would like this for you please let us know. What we need to know is what
strings (last name, first name, phone numbers, emails) you would like to be
replaced. We would like to the replace strings to have the same number of
characters as the original, so if you just want "anon" we will add random
numbers to pad it out. If you want something else, let us know.
Keep in mind that this only changes the archive up to when we do it, so any
emails you send after we replace strings will be archived as is. If you
want to remain anonymous you should re signup to the list with a new email.
If you have any questions about this please let me know.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
-------
Andrew Lowe
Cell: 831-332-2507
http://roshambomedia.com
18 Apr
18 Apr
4:31 p.m.
thank you for working this out, y'all are great!
cheers
Apr 18, 2013 04:26:07 PM, andrew(a)roshambomedia.com wrote:
Hi All,
>_______________________________________________
>sudo-discuss mailing list
>sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
Keep in mind that this only changes the archive up to
when we do it, so any emails you send after we replace strings will be archived as is. If
you want to remain anonymous you should re signup to the list with a new email.
http://roshambomedia.com
4:36 p.m.
Anthony: Honestly, instead of trying to figure out if it would break
everything and then coming up with an elegant solution, we just decided to
sidestep the issue by using the same number of characters.
We could turn the whole thing in to a script to put on the sudo git hub, if
you want to help with that let me know.
--Andrew
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Hol Gaskill <hol(a)gaskill.com> wrote:
--
-------
Andrew Lowe
Cell: 831-332-2507
http://roshambomedia.com
5:19 p.m.
http://strata.oreilly.com/2011/05/anonymize-data-limits.html : Not the best
reference, but I just wanted to point out that anonymization is very
difficult if you want it to be robust. This is good wrt stopping current
generation spam-bots and casual google searches but will not keep things
from being correlated in the Utah DHS datacenter for example.
Regards,
Adam
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
4470
days inactive
4471
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
adam scislowicz -
Andrew -
Anthony Di Franco -
Hol Gaskill