It's the posting on Facebook, not the list, that
recently came to my
attention as potentially risky, so I was seeking advice on the matter.
Jake, you make an excellent point... though I can't speak for Aaron, a
hero rallying against but also a victim of a system that imposes
arbitrary and overly-harsh punishments on copyright violations. Better
to be aware of the risks and protect from costly ramifications, no?
Just putting a disclaimer that Omni is open to members and their
guests (on the fb event) would probably be fine.
Jenny
http://jennyryan.net <http://jennyryan.net/>
http://thepyre.org <http://thepyre.org/>
http://thevirtualcampfire.org <http://thevirtualcampfire.org/>
http://technomadic.tumblr.com <http://technomadic.tumblr.com/>
`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
"Technology is the campfire around which we tell our stories."
-Laurie Anderson
"Storytelling reveals meaning without committing the error of defining
it."
-Hannah Arendt
"To define is to kill. To suggest is to create."
-Stéphane Mallarmé
~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`~`
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Jake <jake(a)spaz.org
<mailto:jake@spaz.org>> wrote:
I disagree. Sudoroom is not "open to the public" it's a membership
organization and members can invite guests. So we can watch
whatever we want together.
jeez you guys, what would Aaron say?
-jake
On Oct. 15th April wrote:
Unfortunately, the best advice is not to hold a public screening of a
film without having a license to screen it. But let's talk about this
off-line. I'll be at Sudo tonight to get knighted as a member-friend.
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
<mailto:sudo-discuss@lists.sudoroom.org>
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
https://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss