Rad!! Sent from my iPad On May 14, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Matthew Senate <mattsenate(a)gmail.com> wrote:

As a queer hacker desiring more queer/fem/trans/POC friendly spaces this excites me! Thanks for sharing! :) On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Rabbit <rabbitface(a)gmail.com> wrote:

YOs- There are subtle shades of meaning in play here, and they aren't all the same for everyone who uses the same language. The following is my personal take on it only: Feminism is a wide range of philosophy and ideology that asserts the absolute equality of rights and self-determination between genders, including in situations where each gender's circumstances may differ (the obvious one being that women can get pregnant, therefore certain implications for reproductive rights, such as the right to safe, legal, and affordable abortion). One of the implications that has arisen from the intersection of feminism and gay/trans rights, is the right of each person to choose the elements of their own gender identity for themselves, and retain full equality of rights and self-determination. The word "inclusive" when attached to a specific noun or adjective, as in "X-inclusive," means that a given organization is making the statement that it is friendly to the needs, wants, and concerns of the individuals in question. Examples of ways this is implemented for gay/trans/gender issues include the provision of private non-gendered bathrooms, equal membership considerations for persons in any relationship status (e.g. no "married/couple discounts" for membership charges), and membership rules that treat gay/trans/gender issues in the same manner as racial/ethnic/religious issues (e.g. homophobic language treated in the same manner as racist language). The word "centered" when attached to a specific noun or adjective, as in "X-centered" or "Y-centric," means that an organization is making the statement that it exists primarily to serve the needs, wants, and concerns, of the individuals identified by the X- or Y-, but that others are welcome to attend. The example that comes to mind for "-centered/-centric" has to do with language: an organization might say that it is "-centric" to a specific language-related cultural group, and use that language as its primary language for its published output, mailing lists, and spoken communication at meetings. Persons who don't speak that language are welcome to attend, and some efforts may optionally be made to provide materials in their languages, but the primary purpose of the group is to serve the constituency that speaks the identified language of the group. Though, there is a risk that "centered/centric" can be used to establish cultural hierarchies: if X is at the "center", then Y and Z are at the periphery. For example the phrase "family-centered" has been used to effectively imply "gay folks need not apply." Often these kinds of language are used to signal to various communities of interest, and attract membership from those communities. And lest we forget, living in the Bay Area where certain kinds of discriminatory attitudes are uniformly unacceptable, the various forms of discrimination, meanness-in-action, and overt violence up to and including torture and murder, really are still with us today: The US Secret Service reports that threats against the president increased 400% for Obama compared to earlier presidents: it's clear that much of this is overt racism. Worse, it has coincided with a shift in the media whereby the use of racist language that even 30 years ago would be universally condemned, is now promoted as "free speech." (Compare the incident that got sportscaster Howard Cosell fired, with the kind of hate-spew that gets Rush Limbaugh a multi-million-dollar contract.) Nazi movements that include overt statements of policy against Jews and immigrants are on the rise in Europe, with Greece and Hungary being two examples frequently in the news. Nazi hate groups exist in the US and are a real terrorist threat (as in hate-crimes) to those they target for their spew. The KKK has lately re-appeared in certain states: America's original domestic terrorist group. A number of states in the US still have state constitutional amendments against marriage equality, even as the tide has begun to turn toward equality (Minnesota and Maryland most recently enacting equal marriage laws). (Credit to President Obama here: his way of handling this issue, starting with equality in the military, has made all the difference.) A number of states have passed draconian laws against abortion, and many other states use regulatory red-tape to effectively limit access to abortion as far as possible. In many parts of the US it is effectively impossible for poor women and abused teens to terminate a pregnancy, even if it occurred through rape. Undocumented immigrants, AND immigrants on certain types of work visas in the US, are still used as a form of un-free labor, discriminated against in the law in numerous ways from family-shredding deportation to effective indenture to their employers, and providing the excuse for exploitative employers to refuse to raise wage rates to true market levels. A number of states' public education systems are still dominated by the extreme religious right, including teaching creationism in the public schools, watering-down all science curricula that differ with their particular religious dogma, and banning any discussion of homosexuality such as to effectively isolate gay youth. (The suicide rate for gay youth is 300% of that for heterosexual youth: the no-talk policies contribute to this in a provably causal manner.) And in a number of countries including Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan, women are effectively PROPERTY, having zero to minimal rights as individual persons, and being subject to the absolute will of their male family members. Keyword search "child brides" and "honor killings" for examples. IMHO this is a human rights atrocity comparable to slavery, that demands the strongest possible international sanctions. So when a group in the US or elsewhere uses language that they're feminist, inclusive, and whatever-centric, this is more than a philosophical statement: it reflects the reality that in the "world of tomorrow" that is the 21st century, we are still fighting cultural wars that date back at least to the Middle Ages. -G. ====== On 13-05-15-Wed 1:15 PM, Andrew wrote: