Sorry, sent out accidentally mid-sentence.
It's worth mentioning that there's now a public notice at 2147 Broadway of Sound
Room's (
) application to serve alcohol - they likely know
what's going since they're now going through the process.
sent from
On Oct 26, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Eddan Katz
<eddank(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Also (a) agriculture; (b) food product; (c) serving food; and (d) serving drinks.
You'll notice that Sound Room has two parts - at 2145 Broadway, there's food and
drinks; and at 2147 Broadway is the non-profit Jazz club. It is my understanding
sent from
eddan.com
> On Oct 26, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Eddan Katz <eddan(a)clear.net> wrote:
>
> I'd like to help out with this research - to compare and contrast the different
insurance agreements, in regards to terms and conditions.
>
> A sample of groups that include heavy machinery, bio-hacking, kids programs, and
eCommerce (products & services) would be the ideal for the essential stuff we'd
need to worry about.
>
> It would be very useful to do some kind of mash-up overlapping this comparative chart
with the ongoing Oakland zoning conditions research. I know there have been various
efforts - does anyone have a sense of where to find this information?
>
>
> sent from
eddan.com
>
>> On Oct 26, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Marc Juul <juul(a)labitat.dk> wrote:
>>
>> To those of you wondering how much liability you'd be taking on, here's a
short summary:
>>
>>
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/nonprofit-directors-personal-liabili…
>>
>> This assumes that sudo room has liability insurance, which should be top priority
as soon we are incorporated (getting liability was a primary motivator for becoming
incorporated in the first place.
>>
>> Who wants to take on the task of researching hacker space liability insurance? I
suggested contacting a few other California hackerspaces and asking about their insurance
policy and pricing and bringing that info to the upcoming weekly meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:24 AM, David Keenan <dkeenan44(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> I missed this meeting and most sudo general due to a public school class at
the same time.. not sure if this disqualifies me from weighing in, or if some i nominate
have perhaps already precluded/disinclined themselves from being nominated, but i thought
I would add my 2c here, (which y'all are also free to totally disregard if course if
needs be) -
>>>
>>> Marc (marcjc)
>>> Matt (mattsenate)
>>> Jenny (tunabananas)
>>> Jordan (yardena)
>>> Marina (mk30)
>>> J.C. (r33lmm)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, October 24, 2013, Max Klein wrote:
>>>> Eddan, that is flattering, I accept nomination.
>>>>
>>>> notconfusing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 24 October 2013 15:18, Eddan Katz <eddan(a)clear.net> wrote:
>>>>> Not sure whether or not it's necessary under the process Yardena
described, but I second Max's nominations for the Board.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also hereby nominate Max (notconfusing) for the Board as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a particular number we're shooting for in terms of the
Board?
>>>>>
>>>>> For reference on what a non-profit Board does (assuming an active
board, which I understand currently is not what we want) - the Nolo Press page at
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/building-nonprofits-board-30046.html is useful, I
think.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> sent from
eddan.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Max Klein <isalix(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I Max (notconfusing), nominate Jordan (yardena), Marina (mk30),
Vicky (ykciv), Liberty (thattechgirl), Kare (kkr), and Jenny (tunabananas) for board
membership.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 October 2013 21:05, Yardena Cohen
<yardenack(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> At tonight's meeting there was consensus that we should
move forward
>>>>>>> with these articles as they are. So for our purposes right
now, they
>>>>>>> are officially ratified:
>>>>>>>
https://sudoroom.org/wiki/Articles_of_Incorporation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, this entails a Board of Directors. So far no
viable
>>>>>>> legal hacks have appeared to work around this. So the next
detail we
>>>>>>> need to tackle is exactly WHO will be on this Board. We
decided that
>>>>>>> the most legitimate way to do this is to let the mailing list
nominate
>>>>>>> names to a list, confirm they are willing, and then consent
on the
>>>>>>> list of names, to address any potential disagreements or
conflicts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please use this thread to nominate yourselves or others to be
on our
>>>>>>> Board of Directors. Remember, this position requires your
name on
>>>>>>> official government paperwork, will come with legal
liability, and
>>>>>>> will be constructed with as little actual power as possible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hopefully this will be settled by next week's meeting
(Oct 30), at
>>>>>>> which point we can actually drive to Sacramento and file!
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>>>>>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>>>>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sudo-discuss mailing list
>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> sudo-discuss mailing list
> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss