+1 on Bill's idea
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, William Budington <bill(a)inputoutput.io>wrote;wrote:
I don't want to assume ill intent of the teacher
herself, and I don't want
to assume she is trying to mislead us. I think that the avenues of funding
are extremely limited for Oakland's public schools, and meanwhile the USAF
and Northrop Grumman are all too eager to find desperate youth and offer
them a 'future' that turns them into killing machines. But we may have an
actual opportunity to talk to the teacher and offer her some alternatives
for the students, and actually wrench such an event from the hands of the
military industrial complex. Wouldn't it be beautiful if we had a
fundraiser for youth from this school that want to work on cool hacking
projects (Oakland Wiki?)
I think there are a multitude of ways to create an alternative event for
these kids, in a way that doesn't say to the teacher "flip off we don't
want your event here" but actually has a positive spin that cuts the USAF
out of the loop. We've actually already been talking about creating a
Sudo-Teens, and I think this would perfectly riff off of that project. As
it happens, my partner actually works for OUSD and is in a unique position
to bridge our goals and theirs, and will be getting in contact with the
teacher herself to propose alternatives. What do you all think?
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:13:41 +0000, Hol Gaskill wrote:
Northrop Grumman is historically, and still almost entirely an arms
manufacturer.
What if we had United Launch Alliance wanting to sponsor a
rocketry program for kids? Where do we draw the perimeter around our
organization? Google? PG&E? Taqueria Sinaloa? I think there are a few
no-brainers both ways, and a vast expanse of grey area. Maybe we could
have 2 levels of association for events - events that are endorsed by the
group wholeheartedly and have no substantial conflicts of interest, and
events where there is no question of value to the intended benefit
recipients but some members have reservations about what it would imply if
we were perceived to be associated as a group. Like, can't be added to the
website or announced via sudo social media nodes, can't use our logo in
their documentation of the event, etc. I think the comment about going
over with the kids themselves about what sponsorship implies is spot on,
maybe give us an opportunity to teach them about all the patriots that have
overthrown their own governments for the better, the patriots that resist
foreign occupation aaand i'll stop there.
Also, this particular event aside, the initial feedback seems to
indicate that
George is OK with some form of highschool-age kids
participating at sudo room which could extend our educational value to the
community. There is this program where HS students share time on cube sats
- I'm trying to get a team formed at my high school in San Antonio, would
be awesome if we could get some students from Oakland in on it. Pretty
basic stuff, just writing software to flash up there and read sensors, then
'up'load the data back to earth. No warheads or anything.
Oct 14, 2013 10:06:19 AM, di.franco(a)gmail.com wrote:
I share the desire to be critical of and proceed carefully with
associations with
military-sponsored events.
I think it will be important for us to hear directly from the kids if
possible
since they have by far the most to gain or lose in this question:
How do they view the sponsorship of the contest, what do they hope to get
from participating in the contest, what do they hope to gain from being at
sudo room (if we will have them)?
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Marc
Juul juul(a)labitat.dk> wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Vicky Knox vknoxsironi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>Marc's response is justified, though I reject the language of the two
opening questions.
My conversation over the phone with Vivienne lead me to believe that she
was
participating in a competition organized by her school and I didn't
carefully scan the email explanation that she sent me afterward to send to
the list. I am really down about my oversight and apologize for it.
I did learn the details of the competition's funding when she and a
colleague
came to see the space and pick up the key the night before their
practice, and at that point I processed the explanation of the sponsorship
much differently than Marc.
>While she is not happy about the sponsor, Vivienne's justification of
pursuing this event was that this was a great opportunity for her students
to get a hold of resources and a learning environment they would otherwise
not have had. She wanted to be able to do this event at a hackerspace
because her ultimate goal was to use this competition as a bridge to
connect to a critical, hacker community (for what this bridge is worth,
given the obvious discrepancy). I felt at once uneasy and understanding. I
respect the sentiment that she expressed that she needed to take the
opportunity that was there, just as I am not quick to jump to judgment of
many of my bright and fascinating friends back home who were in a position
in which they (felt that they?) needed to join the military in order to
realistically afford higher education. That said, I stand with Marc in my
rejection of the military industrial complex (or whatever you would like to
call it), but I do not know the answer to more nuanced questions of access
to aspirational education within a race-class divided society. I invite
your conversation.
This is not a question of access to aspirational education within a
race-class
divided society. The problem I'm having is that you (and
possibly others?) decided to facilitate something called The Air Force
Association's CyberPatriot Competition, with Northrop Grumman as sponsor,
with some form of association to sudo room. Whatever your personal
decision-making process was, you must have realized that at least some
members would strongly disagree with that decision, yet you moved forward
with short warning and without directly bringing the controversial topic in
front of the group for discussion and decision. This should have been taken
up at the weekly meeting. The fact that it was not obvious to you that this
event was controversial enough to warrant serious group discussion before
proceeding is problematic.
If Marc or anyone else would like to bring up this topic at the general
meeting, I
could not make it this Wednesday but am available the following.
I will be there.
Vicky
On Oct 13, 2013 7:31 PM, "Marc Juul" juul(a)labitat.dk> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Vicky Knox vknoxsironi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>Do you all have any recommendations on how to expedite this? What is
the
current status of the large room and using it for events?
>For background, this teacher origianally contacted info@sudoroom but
never got
a response, and called the SR number today, slightly frantic. I
think it would be really awesome if we were able to help her out. This
event seems quite an incredible opportunity for young people.
>What? What have you been smoking?
>The Air Force Association's
CyberPatriot? Sponsored by Northrop
Grumman?! Why are people assuming that this is
something sudo room wants to
support or in any way encourage?
This sounds terrible. I am going to take this up
at this Wednesdays
sudo room meeting. I am completely against anything like this
happening
in or near sudo room in any way shape or form. I do not believe I am
alone in feeling like this. I am both surprised and very disappointed
that a critical and sceptical approach was not taken in dealing with
something like this on behalf of sudo room.
>--
>Marc
>_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
>_______________________________________________
>sudo-discuss mailing list
>sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
>http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss
_______________________________________________
sudo-discuss mailing list
sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org
http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss