Thank you for getting this conversation started, Andrew!
While I think the easiest place to start is with the language we use when promoting our
events (emphasizing that membership is not required to attend), perhaps we can also make
Sudoroom's status as a public (or semi-public) space more explicit in our
communications as well.
Also, since we've been working to find uses for the other 3 Wednesdays of the month,
what if we had a day that was specifically aimed at newcomers to Sudoroom? We could have a
loose structure for the evening (it doesn't have to be a Wednesday; in fact, perhaps
it shouldn't be, as that doesn't seem like a convenient day for most folks).
Example:
7pm: Sudoroom Introduction/tour of the space
7:30: Individual introductions (current projects? projects you want to start but don't
know how? how can we help?)
8/8:30pm: Workshop/Presentation/Movie - e.g. screening of Hackers/Johnny Mnemonic/etc.,
Demonstration of Sudoroom AI art projects, Workshop on hardening your web browser against
ad tracking
------- Original Message -------
On Friday, August 25th, 2023 at 11:54 AM, Andrew R Gross via sudo-discuss
<sudo-discuss(a)sudoroom.org> wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've been focusing on serving the membership working group for a few months, and
I'd like to highlight some issues I see with our new member joining process.
1. It's not clear what membership means. Longtime sudo room members have told me that
membership isn't necessary to participate, it's just a designation that allows you
to weigh in on consensus proposals and endorse members. This isn't the impression the
word has with any new members I've spoken to, though. The term for most people
signifies belonging, and an allowance to attend events, and this misunderstanding is
particularly accute in my experience when dealing with BiPOC folks, women, anyone new to
tech or hackerspaces... just anyone who doesn't arrive with a preexisting sense of
belonging to the dominant cultural ingroup.
2. The new member process puts up a lot of barriers to joining. When people discover Sudo
Room, they often arrive with a sense of excitement to dive in, and then when I start
walking through the steps, I watch all that excitement dissipate. The endorsement process,
for instance, feels like a massive mud patch on a foot track. It seems to interrupt
people's ability to focus on learning about who we are by creating an open-ended
social challenge. Once again, I don't think tech bros who show up or have been members
since the begining experience this at all, but if you're new to the town, or
you've never been part of a hackerspace, this is stressful and confusing. I felt this
way when I joined, and a new member just told me exactly this: they're non-white,
their non-male, and they've never felt like tech spaces were built with them in mind.
They really went outside their comfort zone and met people at events and got the
endorsements, but it seems to be working completely against our interests to put up an
obstacle that selectively filters people like this. Then there's a long wait where
nothing happens, and often no one ever tells a new member that their membership was
approved.
As an exercise I would like to invite people to respond to this email and answer these
two questions:
What roles you think exist in our community? and What processes are effective for helping
people enter into it?
I'm not interested in hearing defenses of the current system. That's not the
exercise. Imagine we're starting from scratch. Maybe, we'll come to find that the
current system actually fulfills certain aims well, but I don't want to frame this as
a change, I want to imagine the process for helping people become at home at Sudo from a
blank page.
Cheers,
Andy
Andrew R Gross, (he/him)
412.657.5332 - [shrad.org](http://www.shrad.org)