@Rachel The state of the technology for recognizing and separating patterns in audio is advanced enough to overcome that sort of thing. Every person's voice has a distinct signature that can be recognized. I would venture a guess that some kind of encrypted digital signal transmission would be the best way to keep any sonic communication private in the most extreme of situations. (most interested party with the best technology at their disposal) – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – >8 /V\ /-\ + + |–| ø \/\/ ∂ £ £ ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Matthew D. Howell misterinterrupt, tHe M4d swiTcH, the RuinMechanic cell: (617) 755-1481 ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, rachel lyra hospodar <rachelyra(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Wouldn't it need to be non-commercially available music, so they > couldn't > just find the audio data of the track, invert its wave, and cancel it > out of > the recording? > > CACOPHONY FOR THE REVOLUTION! > > mediumreality.com > > On Mar 5, 2013 10:23 AM, "Steve Berl" <steveberl(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> You could carry a boombox around playing loud music where ever you >> go. >> Perhaps this would be the end of earbuds. :-) >> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Di Franco >> <di.franco(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> People have rendered surveillance cameras useless with very bright >>> IR >>> LEDs in their fields of view. >>> Could something similar be done for sound recording devices? >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2013 6:17 AM, "Anon195714" <anon195714(a)sbcglobal.net> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Yo's- >>>> >>>> Something I forgot to add re. DARPA's desire for universal >>>> recording of >>>> face-to-face conversations. >>>> >>>> What's the ideal device for doing all that recording? >>>> >>>> How'bout something you wear? How'bout something that "everyone" >>>> wears?, >>>> or even a significant fraction of "everyone"? >>>> >>>> Like maybe Google Glasses. >>>> >>>> Always on, camera and mic always "connected" to "the cloud." >>>> Orwell's >>>> telescreen gone mobile. >>>> >>>> Everyone who wears them will become, in effect, _unpaid >>>> surveillance >>>> drones_ watching their family and friends, not from up in the sky, >>>> but >>>> from up close where every word can be heard. >>>> >>>> Some will say "oh, there's no stopping technology." People said >>>> that >>>> about the atomic bomb and the hydrogen bomb. But public outcry led >>>> first to treaties and then to progressive degrees of nuclear >>>> disarmament. We haven't used that technology since it was first >>>> used in >>>> WW2. >>>> >>>> We can stop pernicious tech if we choose. We can refuse, we can >>>> withdraw consent, we do not have to press the Buy button. >>>> >>>> Technology should liberate and empower people. "Conveniences with >>>> a few >>>> strings attached" are not liberation, they're puppet-strings. >>>> >>>> It's all about control: technology that you can control, vs. >>>> technology >>>> that can control you. >>>> >>>> -G. >>>> >>>> >>>> ===== >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13-03-05-Tue 1:50 AM, Anon195714 wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Yo's- >>>> > >>>> > This just in: >>>> > >>>> > "DARPA wants to make [voice recognition/transcription] systems so >>>> > accurate, you’ll be able to easily record, transcribe and recall >>>> > all >>>> > the >>>> > conversations you ever have. ... Imagine living in a world where >>>> > every >>>> > errant utterance you make is preserved forever. ... DARPA >>>> > [awarded >>>> > U.Texas comp sci researcher Matt Lease]... $300,000... over two >>>> > years >>>> > to >>>> > study the new project, called “Blending Crowdsourcing with >>>> > Automation >>>> > for Fast, Cheap, and Accurate Analysis of Spontaneous Speech.”" >>>> > >>>> > "The idea is that business meetings or even conversations with >>>> > your >>>> > friends and family could be stored in archives and easily >>>> > searched. >>>> > The >>>> > stored recordings could be held in servers, owned either by >>>> > individuals >>>> > or their employers. ... The answer, Lease says, is in widespread >>>> > use >>>> > of >>>> > recording technologies like smartphones, cameras and audio >>>> > recorders... >>>> > [A] memorandum from the Congressional Research Service described >>>> > [an >>>> > earlier DARPA project of this type known as] EARS, as focusing on >>>> > speech >>>> > picked up from broadcasts and telephone conversations, “as well >>>> > as >>>> > extract clues about the identity of speakers” for “the military, >>>> > intelligence and law enforcement communities.”" >>>> > >>>> > http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/03/darpa-speech/ (Yes, "real >>>> > geeks >>>> > don't read Wired," but nonetheless its news pages are useful for >>>> > keeping >>>> > a finger on the pulse of Big Brother and his corporate Brethren.) >>>> > >>>> > In short: >>>> > >>>> > DARPA is researching the means by which every conversation you >>>> > have, >>>> > in-person, whether at work or with family or friends, gets picked >>>> > up >>>> > by >>>> > the mic in your smartphone or other portable device, and stored >>>> > on a >>>> > server, where DARPA's algorithms and human editors turn all of it >>>> > into >>>> > fast-searchable text, that could be used by your employer, the >>>> > military, >>>> > law enforcement, and intel agencies. Presumably the credit >>>> > bureaus, >>>> > insurance companies, and financial institutions will want "in" on >>>> > the >>>> > data as well. >>>> > >>>> > Now connect that with this, about cell-site tracking and call >>>> > detail >>>> > records: >>>> > >>>> > "The government maintained [that] Americans have no expectation >>>> > of >>>> > privacy of such cell-site records [call detail records or CDR] >>>> > because >>>> > they are in the possession of a third party — the mobile phone >>>> > companies." >>>> > >>>> > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/gps-drug-dealer-retrial/ >>>> > >>>> > The key point is that the gov's current position is that data >>>> > stored >>>> > on >>>> > a third party's servers have "no expectation of privacy." What >>>> > begins >>>> > with CDR will eventually include voicemail messages stored on the >>>> > mobile >>>> > phone companies' servers, and then eventually all of your live >>>> > in-person >>>> > conversations that are stored "in the cloud." >>>> > >>>> > "Anything you say can and will be used against you..." Mark my >>>> > words. >>>> > >>>> > Meanwhile people keep using gmail and Google Voice, and >>>> > smartphones >>>> > from >>>> > which they can't remove the batteries. Because nothing is more >>>> > important >>>> > than "convenience," right? >>>> > >>>> > As a character in a sci-fi piece I wrote in the mid-1980s said, >>>> > "Why >>>> > put >>>> > a person in prison, when you can put prison in the person >>>> > instead?" >>>> > >>>> > -G. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > sudo-discuss mailing list >>>> > sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>>> > http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>>> > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sudo-discuss mailing list >>> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >>> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -steve >> _______________________________________________ >> sudo-discuss mailing list >> sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org >> http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > sudo-discuss mailing list > sudo-discuss(a)lists.sudoroom.org > http://lists.sudoroom.org/listinfo/sudo-discuss >